https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/issue/feed Rechtsidee 2025-07-19T11:43:03+00:00 Noor Fatimah Mediawati rechtsidee@umsida.ac.id Open Journal Systems <table class="data" width="100%" bgcolor="#ced6e0"> <tbody> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Accreditated</td> <td width="80%"><a title="accreditation certificate" href="http://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/journals/detail?id=1915" target="_self"><strong>"S3" by the Ministry of Research-Technology and Higher Education Republic of Indonesia</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Initials</td> <td width="80%"><strong>Rechtsidee</strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">DOI</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a href="https://search.crossref.org/?q=2443-3497">prefix 10.21070</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Citation Analysis</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/scopuscitation"><strong>SCOPUS</strong></a><strong> | Web of Science | <a href="https://app.dimensions.ai/analytics/publication/overview/timeline?or_facet_source_title=jour.1153688&amp;local:indicator-y1=citation-per-year-publications">Dimensions</a> | </strong><a title="Google Scholar" href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=udZlNyMAAAAJ&amp;hl=id" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Google Scholar</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Index Services</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2443-3497">DOAJ</a> |<a title="Google Scholar" href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=udZlNyMAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Google Scholar</a> | </strong><a href="https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/indexing"><strong>Complete List</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">ISSN (online)</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="ISSN (online)" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1425623336" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2443-3497</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">ISSN (Print)</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="ISSN (cetak)" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1376901057" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2338-8595</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Publisher</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="Publisher" href="https://umsida.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Editor in Chief</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-1199">Mochammad Tanzil Multazam</a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Managing Editor</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-1190">Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy</a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Frequency</td> <td width="80%"><strong>2 (two) issues per year (June and December)</strong></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>RECHTSIDEE is a distinguished academic journal dedicated to fostering advanced scholarship in the broad field of Legal Studies and Human Rights. The journal serves as a dynamic forum for the publication of original research articles, illuminating reviews, and insightful book critiques, inviting contributions from academics, analysts, and practitioners alike. Our mission is to enhance the depth and breadth of legal discourse by focusing on diverse legal disciplines including, but not limited to, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Indonesian Law, Business Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Administrative Law, International Law, and Philosophy of Law. The journal maintains a special emphasis on research pertaining to Human Rights, underlining our commitment to a legal ecosystem that upholds justice, fairness, and dignity for all. In its pursuit of scholarly excellence, RECHTSIDEE strives to shape the global conversation on critical legal issues, informing policy, and inspiring innovation.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1066 Criminal Law Enforcement against Illegal Gold Mining (Study of Decision No. 153/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Mdl) 2025-07-19T11:43:03+00:00 Xhifa Mayputeri Melati xhifa0206213058@uinsu.ac.id Budi Sastra Panjaitan budisastrapanjaitan@uinsu.ac.id <p><strong data-start="14" data-end="36">General Background</strong>: Illegal gold mining has long served as a vital economic lifeline for communities in Lingga Bayu District, Mandailing Natal Regency. <strong data-start="170" data-end="193" data-is-only-node="">Specific Background</strong>: Despite its deep-rooted presence and socio-economic significance, such mining activities persist without formal governmental authorization, creating tension between legal norms and community livelihoods. <strong data-start="399" data-end="416">Knowledge Gap</strong>: Existing legal enforcement often emphasizes punitive action, yet overlooks the structural socio-economic challenges faced by traditional miners. <strong data-start="563" data-end="571">Aims</strong>: This study examines the implementation of criminal law enforcement against illegal gold mining and evaluates the fairness and justice outcomes of Decision Number 153/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mdl by the Mandailing Natal District Court. <strong data-start="799" data-end="810">Results</strong>: Findings indicate that while law enforcement adheres to normative legal standards and ensures legal certainty, it falls short in delivering substantive justice and long-term legal benefits for local miners. <strong data-start="1019" data-end="1030">Novelty</strong>: The study highlights the misalignment between repressive legal mechanisms and the socio-cultural realities of community-based mining practices, advocating for a shift from a purely legalistic approach to one that is humanistic and transformative. <strong data-start="1279" data-end="1295">Implications</strong>: The research suggests a need for integrative legal reform, including affirmative policies for people's mining legalization, to achieve holistic and sustainable justice for marginalized mining communities.</p> <p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p> <ul> <li data-start="103" data-end="188"> <p data-start="106" data-end="188">Highlights the gap between legal enforcement and local socio-economic realities.</p> </li> <li data-start="189" data-end="269"> <p data-start="192" data-end="269">Critiques the repressive nature of criminal law against traditional miners.</p> </li> <li data-start="270" data-end="332" data-is-last-node=""> <p data-start="273" data-end="332" data-is-last-node="">Proposes a transformative and inclusive legal reform model.</p> </li> </ul> <p><strong data-start="0" data-end="12">Keywords</strong>: Illegal Mining, Law Enforcement, Community Justice, Court Decision, Humanistic Approach</p> 2025-07-19T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Xhifa Mayputeri Melati, Budi Sastra Panjaitan (Author) https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1067 Appointment of Notaries under Indonesian and Singaporean Law 2025-07-16T04:29:40+00:00 Viona Widjaja viona.widjaja@gmail.com Benny Djaja bennyd@fh.untar.ac.id <p><strong data-start="0" data-end="23" data-is-only-node="">General Background:</strong> Notaries play a vital role in society by providing legal certainty through authentic deeds. <strong data-start="116" data-end="140">Specific Background:</strong> However, their status and appointment processes vary significantly depending on the legal system of a country. <strong data-start="252" data-end="270">Knowledge Gap:</strong> There is limited comparative analysis regarding the appointment of notaries in civil law countries like Indonesia and common law countries like Singapore. <strong data-start="426" data-end="435">Aims:</strong> This study aims to analyze and compare the legal frameworks governing the appointment of notaries in Indonesia and Singapore, highlighting their differences, similarities, strengths, and weaknesses. <strong data-start="635" data-end="647">Results:</strong> The findings reveal significant differences in the appointment process, requirements, and supervisory authority. In Indonesia, notaries are appointed by the Minister of Law and Human Rights based on Law No. 2 of 2014, while in Singapore, the appointment is conducted by the Senate of the Singapore Academy of Law under the Notaries Public Act Chapter 208. <strong data-start="1004" data-end="1016">Novelty:</strong> This study offers a focused comparative analysis of notarial appointment processes within two distinct legal traditions—civil law and common law—which is rarely addressed in previous literature. <strong data-start="1212" data-end="1229">Implications:</strong> The results provide practical insights for legal practitioners and policymakers in Indonesia and offer considerations for improving the notarial appointment system in line with global best practices.</p> <p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p> <ul> <li data-start="88" data-end="186"> <p data-start="91" data-end="186">Highlights the structural differences in notary appointments between Indonesia and Singapore.</p> </li> <li data-start="187" data-end="276"> <p data-start="190" data-end="276">Reveals the impact of legal traditions (civil vs. common law) on notarial authority.</p> </li> <li data-start="277" data-end="350" data-is-last-node=""> <p data-start="280" data-end="350" data-is-last-node="">Provides insights to improve Indonesia’s notarial appointment process.</p> </li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong data-start="0" data-end="13">Keywords:</strong> Notary Appointment, Comparative Law, Civil Law, Common Law, Legal System</p> 2025-07-16T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Viona Widjaja, Benny Djaja (Author)