https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee <table class="data" width="100%" bgcolor="#ced6e0"> <tbody> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Accreditated</td> <td width="80%"><a title="accreditation certificate" href="http://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/journals/detail?id=1915" target="_self"><strong>"S3" by the Ministry of Research-Technology and Higher Education Republic of Indonesia</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Initials</td> <td width="80%"><strong>Rechtsidee</strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">DOI</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a href="https://search.crossref.org/?q=2443-3497">prefix 10.21070</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Citation Analysis</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/scopuscitation"><strong>SCOPUS</strong></a><strong> | Web of Science | <a href="https://app.dimensions.ai/analytics/publication/overview/timeline?or_facet_source_title=jour.1153688&amp;local:indicator-y1=citation-per-year-publications">Dimensions</a> | </strong><a title="Google Scholar" href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=udZlNyMAAAAJ&amp;hl=id" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Google Scholar</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Index Services</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2443-3497">DOAJ</a> |<a title="Google Scholar" href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=udZlNyMAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Google Scholar</a> | </strong><a href="https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/indexing"><strong>Complete List</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">ISSN (online)</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="ISSN (online)" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1425623336" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2443-3497</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">ISSN (Print)</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="ISSN (cetak)" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1376901057" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2338-8595</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Publisher</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="Publisher" href="https://umsida.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Editor in Chief</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-1199">Mochammad Tanzil Multazam</a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Managing Editor</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-1190">Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy</a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Frequency</td> <td width="80%"><strong>2 (two) issues per year (June and December)</strong></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>RECHTSIDEE is a distinguished academic journal dedicated to fostering advanced scholarship in the broad field of Legal Studies and Human Rights. The journal serves as a dynamic forum for the publication of original research articles, illuminating reviews, and insightful book critiques, inviting contributions from academics, analysts, and practitioners alike. Our mission is to enhance the depth and breadth of legal discourse by focusing on diverse legal disciplines including, but not limited to, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Indonesian Law, Business Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Administrative Law, International Law, and Philosophy of Law. The journal maintains a special emphasis on research pertaining to Human Rights, underlining our commitment to a legal ecosystem that upholds justice, fairness, and dignity for all. In its pursuit of scholarly excellence, RECHTSIDEE strives to shape the global conversation on critical legal issues, informing policy, and inspiring innovation.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo en-US Rechtsidee 2338-8595 <p>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> <p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="http://ojs.umsida.ac.id/public/site/images/tanzilmultazam/88x311.png" alt=""></a></p> https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1067 <p><strong data-start="0" data-end="23" data-is-only-node="">General Background:</strong> Notaries play a vital role in society by providing legal certainty through authentic deeds. <strong data-start="116" data-end="140">Specific Background:</strong> However, their status and appointment processes vary significantly depending on the legal system of a country. <strong data-start="252" data-end="270">Knowledge Gap:</strong> There is limited comparative analysis regarding the appointment of notaries in civil law countries like Indonesia and common law countries like Singapore. <strong data-start="426" data-end="435">Aims:</strong> This study aims to analyze and compare the legal frameworks governing the appointment of notaries in Indonesia and Singapore, highlighting their differences, similarities, strengths, and weaknesses. <strong data-start="635" data-end="647">Results:</strong> The findings reveal significant differences in the appointment process, requirements, and supervisory authority. In Indonesia, notaries are appointed by the Minister of Law and Human Rights based on Law No. 2 of 2014, while in Singapore, the appointment is conducted by the Senate of the Singapore Academy of Law under the Notaries Public Act Chapter 208. <strong data-start="1004" data-end="1016">Novelty:</strong> This study offers a focused comparative analysis of notarial appointment processes within two distinct legal traditions—civil law and common law—which is rarely addressed in previous literature. <strong data-start="1212" data-end="1229">Implications:</strong> The results provide practical insights for legal practitioners and policymakers in Indonesia and offer considerations for improving the notarial appointment system in line with global best practices.</p> <p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p> <ul> <li data-start="88" data-end="186"> <p data-start="91" data-end="186">Highlights the structural differences in notary appointments between Indonesia and Singapore.</p> </li> <li data-start="187" data-end="276"> <p data-start="190" data-end="276">Reveals the impact of legal traditions (civil vs. common law) on notarial authority.</p> </li> <li data-start="277" data-end="350" data-is-last-node=""> <p data-start="280" data-end="350" data-is-last-node="">Provides insights to improve Indonesia’s notarial appointment process.</p> </li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong data-start="0" data-end="13">Keywords:</strong> Notary Appointment, Comparative Law, Civil Law, Common Law, Legal System</p> Viona Widjaja Benny Djaja Copyright (c) 2025 Viona Widjaja, Benny Djaja (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025-07-16 2025-07-16 13 2 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1067 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1067 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1067