Rechtsidee https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee <table class="data" width="100%" bgcolor="#ced6e0"> <tbody> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Accreditated</td> <td width="80%"><a title="accreditation certificate" href="http://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/journals/detail?id=1915" target="_self"><strong>"S3" by the Ministry of Research-Technology and Higher Education Republic of Indonesia</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Initials</td> <td width="80%"><strong>Rechtsidee</strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">DOI</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a href="https://search.crossref.org/?q=2443-3497">prefix 10.21070</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Citation Analysis</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/scopuscitation"><strong>SCOPUS</strong></a><strong> | Web of Science | <a href="https://app.dimensions.ai/analytics/publication/overview/timeline?or_facet_source_title=jour.1153688&amp;local:indicator-y1=citation-per-year-publications">Dimensions</a> | </strong><a title="Google Scholar" href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=udZlNyMAAAAJ&amp;hl=id" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>Google Scholar</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Index Services</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a href="https://doaj.org/toc/2443-3497">DOAJ</a> |<a title="Google Scholar" href="https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=udZlNyMAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Google Scholar</a> | </strong><a href="https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/indexing"><strong>Complete List</strong></a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">ISSN (online)</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="ISSN (online)" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1425623336" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2443-3497</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">ISSN (Print)</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="ISSN (cetak)" href="https://issn.brin.go.id/terbit/detail/1376901057" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2338-8595</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Publisher</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="Publisher" href="https://umsida.ac.id/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Editor in Chief</td> <td width="80%"><strong><a title="Managing Editor" href="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-1190" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dr. Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy, M.H.</a></strong></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Managing Editor</td> <td width="80%"><a href="https://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/authors/profile/6002268">Dr. Noor Fatimah Mediawati, M.H.&nbsp;</a></td> </tr> <tr valign="top"> <td width="20%">Frequency</td> <td width="80%"><strong>2 (two) issues per year (June and December)</strong></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>RECHTSIDEE is a distinguished academic journal dedicated to fostering advanced scholarship in the broad field of Legal Studies and Human Rights. The journal serves as a dynamic forum for the publication of original research articles, illuminating reviews, and insightful book critiques, inviting contributions from academics, analysts, and practitioners alike. Our mission is to enhance the depth and breadth of legal discourse by focusing on diverse legal disciplines including, but not limited to, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Indonesian Law, Business Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Administrative Law, International Law, and Philosophy of Law. The journal maintains a special emphasis on research pertaining to Human Rights, underlining our commitment to a legal ecosystem that upholds justice, fairness, and dignity for all. In its pursuit of scholarly excellence, RECHTSIDEE strives to shape the global conversation on critical legal issues, informing policy, and inspiring innovation.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo en-US Rechtsidee 2338-8595 <p>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> <p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="http://ojs.umsida.ac.id/public/site/images/tanzilmultazam/88x311.png" alt=""></a></p> Punishment for Perpetrators with Special Needs (Disability) in the Current Criminal Process https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1030 <p><strong>General background</strong> of this research emphasizes the state's vital role in ensuring the rights of persons with disabilities within the legal framework, particularly in criminal proceedings. The <strong>specific background</strong> highlights the challenges these individuals face in the justice system, often encountering biases that hinder their access to justice. The <strong>knowledge gap</strong> identified indicates a lack of comprehensive research on the legal treatment and punishment of offenders with disabilities in Indonesia, especially under the new Criminal Code. This research aims to analyze punishment implementation for such offenders and the collaboration between judges and psychiatrists for fair legal processes. The <strong>results</strong> reveal that a normative descriptive method, incorporating expert assessments and judicial discretion, is crucial for adjudicating these cases. The <strong>novelty</strong> lies in proposing a collaborative approach that encourages judges to consider legal principles alongside individual circumstances. The <strong>implications</strong> advocate for systemic reforms to enhance protections and treatment of persons with disabilities in the criminal justice system, ensuring equitable rights and justice for all citizens. This study contributes to the dialogue on legal reform and social justice, urging policymakers to foster an inclusive legal environment.</p> <p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Emphasizes the importance of integrating expert assessments in legal proceedings for offenders with disabilities.</li> <li>Advocates for a collaborative approach between judges and psychiatrists to ensure fair treatment.</li> <li>Highlights the need for systemic reforms to protect the rights of persons with disabilities in the justice system.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Disability, Punishment, Legal Reform, Equality, Criminal Offenders</p> Lutfah Rahayu Copyright (c) 2024 Lutfah Rahayu (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-11-01 2024-11-01 12 2 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1030 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1030 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1030 Legal Analysis of CSR Practices on Community Welfare in the Textile Industry https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1027 <div class="flex-shrink-0 flex flex-col relative items-end"> <div> <div class="pt-0"> <div class="gizmo-bot-avatar flex h-8 w-8 items-center justify-center overflow-hidden rounded-full"> <div class="relative p-1 rounded-sm flex items-center justify-center bg-token-main-surface-primary text-token-text-primary h-8 w-8"><strong>General Background</strong>: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is integral to sustainable economic development and improving community welfare through responsible corporate engagement with stakeholders and the environment. <strong>Specific Background</strong>: The application of CSR varies significantly across different industrial sectors, influenced by local regulations and company-specific challenges. <strong>Knowledge Gap</strong>: Comprehensive analysis on the legal aspects and practical implications of CSR in specific industries, such as textile manufacturing, remains limited. <strong>Aims</strong>: This study aims to evaluate the legal frameworks governing CSR and their impact on community welfare within the textile industry. <strong>Results</strong>: Findings reveal effective integration of CSR, with a focus on education, health, and environmental sustainability, aligning with legal standards of transparency and accountability. <strong>Novelty</strong>: The research provides a focused analysis on legal CSR mandates within the textile sector, highlighting specific corporate practices and compliance. <strong>Implications</strong>: The study highlights the necessity of aligning corporate strategies with legal and ethical standards to enhance social and environmental wellbeing, suggesting more equitable CSR implementation across industries.</div> <div class="relative p-1 rounded-sm flex items-center justify-center bg-token-main-surface-primary text-token-text-primary h-8 w-8"><strong>Highlights:</strong></div> <ul> <li>Legal Compliance: Adherence to CSR laws ensuring transparency and accountability.</li> <li>Community Impact: Effectiveness of CSR in improving local welfare, especially in education and health.</li> <li>Sustainability Practices: Integration of environmental sustainability in corporate strategies.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Keywords: </strong>Corporate Social Responsibility, Community Welfare, Transparency, Accountability</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> Maharani Octavia Yosie Saputri Achmad Suharto A. H. As’ari Taufiqurohman Aulia Aulia Dwi Edi Wibowo Copyright (c) 2024 Maharani Octavia Yosie Saputri, Achmad Suharto, A. H. As’ari Taufiqurohman, Aulia Aulia, Dwi Edi Wibowo (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-08-20 2024-08-20 12 2 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1027 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1027 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1027 Judicial Reduction of Penalties in Georgian Civil Law: Balancing Debtor and Creditor Rights https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1031 <p><strong>General Background:</strong> Judicial discretion in the reduction of penalties plays a crucial role in balancing the interests of contracting parties under the Civil Code of Georgia. <strong>Specific Background:</strong> Article 420 grants courts the authority to reduce disproportionately high penalties, yet the lack of explicit legal criteria leaves room for case-by-case judicial interpretation. <strong>Knowledge Gap:</strong> Despite the volume of case law, there remains no standardized framework guiding courts in determining what constitutes an “inappropriately high” penalty. <strong>Aims:</strong> This study seeks to analyze Georgian court decisions to identify patterns and criteria employed when reducing penalties under Article 420. <strong>Results:</strong> The findings reveal that courts emphasize proportionality, reasonableness, and the specific circumstances of the breach, including the degree of fault and the scope of unfulfilled obligations. Moreover, the financial status of the parties and market expectations further influence judicial decisions. <strong>Novelty:</strong> This article consolidates judicial practices to offer a comprehensive framework for reducing penalties, contributing to both theoretical understanding and practical application in legal practice. It introduces a calculation methodology and suggests criteria for equitable penalty reduction in specific legal relationships. <strong>Implications:</strong> These insights will support legal practitioners in formulating fairer contracts, assist courts in maintaining contractual balance, and guide future legal reforms, fostering both justice and efficiency in contractual relationships.<br><strong>Highlights:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Georgian courts use proportionality and reasonableness to reduce penalties under Article 420.</li> <li>The absence of explicit legal criteria allows case-by-case interpretation, ensuring flexibility but creating inconsistency.</li> <li>Financial status, market expectations, and fault degree influence the court’s discretionary decisions.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Penalty, Discretionary Power, Civil Code, Contractual Balance, Judicial Practice</p> Natia Rekhviashvili Nino Kharitonashvili Copyright (c) 2024 Natia Rekhviashvili, Nino Kharitonashvili (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-10-15 2024-10-15 12 2 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1031 The Conflict and Competition among Regional Powers and its Effect on the Region’s Stability https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/1023 <p>This article explores the longstanding regional animosities and power rivalries among Turkey, Iran, and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East, focusing on their impact on regional peace and stability. Despite extensive research on Middle Eastern geopolitics, there is a need for a comprehensive understanding of how these rivalries shape the region's security dynamics. The study aims to analyze the geopolitical goals driving these powers towards regional dominance, including territorial disputes, religious or ethnic tensions, resource distribution issues, and ambitions to alter the regional structure. Using qualitative analysis of historical and contemporary conflicts, the research highlights how sectarian warfare, proxy wars, and transnational violence contribute to regional instability. The findings reveal that the use of proxies by regional powers exacerbates tensions, leading to humanitarian crises and escalating conflicts. This study underscores the necessity for diplomatic interventions and international cooperation to mitigate the adverse effects of these rivalries on the Middle East's stability.</p> <p><strong>Highlights:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Dominance Goals: Driven by territorial, religious, and resource issues.</li> <li>Proxy Wars: Heighten instability and humanitarian crises.</li> <li>Regional Impact: Escalate tensions and threaten peace.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Middle East, Proxy Wars, Sectarianism, Geopolitical Interests, Destabilization</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Saleem F. Aljebori Copyright (c) 2024 Salim Neamah; Saleem F. Aljebori (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-06-29 2024-06-29 12 2 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1023 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1023 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1023