Rechtsidee

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Administrative Law

Legal Force of Administrative Remedies in the Settlement of State Administrative Disputes: Kekuatan Hukum Tindakan Administratif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara

PDF
  • Putri Julian Masbait,
  • Hendrik Salmon,
  • Dezonda R. Pattipawae
Putri Julian Masbait
Universitas Pattimura
Hendrik Salmon
Universitas Pattimura
Dezonda R. Pattipawae
Universitas Pattimura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1082
Categories

Published 2025-10-30

Keywords

  • Legal Force,
  • Administrative Remedies,
  • State Administrative Disputes,
  • Legal Certainty,
  • Access to Justice

How to Cite

Masbait, P. J., Salmon, H., & Pattipawae, D. R. (2025). Legal Force of Administrative Remedies in the Settlement of State Administrative Disputes: Kekuatan Hukum Tindakan Administratif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara. Rechtsidee, 13(2), 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1082. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1082

Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Julian Masbait, Hendrik Salmon, Dezonda R. Pattipawae (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

General Background: Indonesia, as a constitutional state, mandates that administrative actions adhere to legal norms, where administrative dispute resolution mechanisms play a vital role in ensuring justice and accountability in governance. Specific Background: The existence of administrative remedies—comprising objections and administrative appeals—serves as a non-judicial mechanism designed to resolve conflicts internally before proceeding to the State Administrative Court (PTUN). However, inconsistencies between Law No. 5/1986, Law No. 30/2014, and Supreme Court Regulation No. 6/2018 have created uncertainty regarding the obligatory nature of these remedies. Knowledge Gap: Limited research has comprehensively analyzed the binding legal force of administrative remedies and their implications for legal certainty and access to justice. Aims: This study aims to analyze the legal force and implications of administrative remedies in resolving state administrative disputes. Results: Findings show that administrative objections generally lack binding legal force and function more as recommendations, while administrative appeals possess stronger but under-implemented authority. Novelty: The research highlights disharmony among the relevant legal frameworks and its effect on the principle of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Implications: Strengthening the effectiveness and accountability of administrative remedies is crucial to enhance access to justice and ensure legal certainty within Indonesia’s administrative law system.

Highlights:

  • Examines the inconsistency between laws regulating administrative remedies.

  • Identifies the weak binding power of objections and limited efficacy of appeals.

  • Highlights the need for stronger accountability to ensure access to justice.

Keywords: Legal Force, Administrative Remedies, State Administrative Disputes, Legal Certainty, Access to Justice

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. N. Rahim, N. Vatmawati, C. Irmadani, and E. Paselle, “Kasus Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Dengan Objek Putusan Nomor 9/G/2023/PTUN.SMD., Kecamatan Balikpapan Selatan,” Binamulia Hukum, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2024, doi: 10.37893/jbh.v13i1.671.
  2. Jhoniansyah, “Settlement of Village Apparatus Selection Dispute Through the State Administrative Court,” JUSTICES Journal of Law, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 142–154, 2023, doi: 10.58355/justices.v2i3.13.
  3. S. Safiuddin, L. Sensu, and G. Tatawu, “Analisis Hukum Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Tata Usaha,” Halu Oleo Legal Research Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 773–780, 2024.
  4. T. Batu, A. L. T., and Hayati, “Penanganan Bagi Pejabat Pemerintah yang Tidak Melaksanakan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara,” UNES Law Review, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2918–2927, 2023.
  5. F. Faisal, “Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara,” Jurnal Ar-Risalah, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.30863/arrisalah.v4i1.5601.
  6. N. Syamila, “Optimalisasi Upaya Administratif Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 457–468, 2024.
  7. H. A. Khair, S. E. Siswanto, and M. Saleh, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Banding Administratif,” Jatiswara, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 416–438, 2016.
  8. F. Hukum, U. Islam, S. Agung, and J. Tengah, “Studi Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara di Indonesia dan Amerika,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Kenegaraan, vol. 3, pp. 34–41, 1945.
  9. B. Rahmaddoni, K. Warman, and Y. Yuslim, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Upaya Administratif di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Padang,” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 749–758, 2023, doi: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.371.
  10. P. Hudoprakoso, “Pemberlakuan Upaya Administrasi Sebagai Primum Remedium Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara,” Journal of Law, Politics and Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 178–197, 2023, doi: 10.55606/jhpis.v1i1.1747.
  11. K. O. Astawa and P. P. L. Oka, “Problematika Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa TUN dengan Menggunakan Upaya Administratif Setelah Diberlakukannya UU No. 30 Tahun 2014,” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2020.
  12. F. A. Jiwantara, A. Nugraha, and R. Santoso, “The Executorial Force of Ruling of Administrative Court and the Implications in Practice,” Journal of Administrative Law Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2014.
  13. A. Rayhan and S. K. Wijaya, “Efektivitas Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Putusan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara,” Jurnal Peradilan Hukum, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2022.
  14. E. D. Safitri and N. Sa’adah, “Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara,” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2021, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45.
  15. G. E. Guyanie, “Eksistensi dan Urgensi Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan di Indonesia,” Staatsrecht: Journal of Constitutional Law and Political Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2021, doi: 10.14421/staatsrecht.v1i2.2471.