Login
Section Criminal Law

Substantive Justice in Law Enforcement against Nominee Account Crimes from the Perspective of Aristotle and H.L.A. Hart's Philosophy

Keadilan Substantif dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Akun Nominee dalam Perspektif Filsafat Aristoteles dan H.L.A. Hart
Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December:

Beren Rukur Ginting (1), Albert Huppy Wounde (2), Fendi Setyawan (3), M. Arief Amrullah (4)

(1) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(3) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
(4) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia

Abstract:

General Background: The rapid development of financial systems and information technology has intensified complex economic crimes, including the misuse of nominee accounts to conceal beneficial ownership. Specific Background: In Indonesia, law enforcement often remains trapped in formalistic approaches that focus on nominal account holders, overlooking substantive perpetrators behind nominee structures. Knowledge Gap: This condition reveals a gap between formal legal responsibility and substantive justice, where moral culpability and true control over assets are insufficiently addressed in positive law enforcement practices. Aims: This study aims to analyze the application of substantive justice in handling crimes involving nominee accounts through the philosophical perspectives of Aristotle and H.L.A. Hart. Results: Using a normative-juridical and philosophical approach, the study finds that effective law enforcement should assess legal responsibility based on actual control, intent, and benefit, rather than mere formal ownership. Novelty: By integrating Aristotle’s concepts of distributive and corrective justice with Hart’s theory of legal rules and moral reasoning, this study offers a synthesized philosophical framework for penetrating legal formalism in nominee-related crimes. Implications: The findings imply the need for a paradigm shift in Indonesian law enforcement toward substantively just, morally grounded, and proportionate accountability to ensure that law functions as an instrument of genuine justice rather than procedural compliance alone.


Highlights:




  • Emphasizes the need to move beyond formal ownership toward identifying the true beneficial owner in nominee-based crimes.




  • Integrates classical moral philosophy and modern legal theory to strengthen substantively just law enforcement.




  • Highlights the urgency of reforming Indonesian legal practices to align legal certainty with moral accountability.




Keywords: Substantive Justice, Nominee Accounts, Legal Formalism, Aristotle, H.L.A. Hart

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Book V, trans. T. Irwin, 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Hackett Publishing, 1999.

H. L. A. Hart, “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 593–629, 1958.

H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1994.

R. Kraut, Aristotle on the Human Good. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Rudianto, Asas Beneficial Ownership dalam Hukum Perbankan dan Pencucian Uang. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK), Laporan Tahunan PPATK 2023. Jakarta, Indonesia: PPATK, 2023.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), Kajian Modus Akun Nominee dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta, Indonesia: KPK Research Division, 2022.

S. Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kompas, 2009.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Hackett Publishing, 1999, Book V, 1129a–1131b.

Aristotle, Politics, trans. C. Lord. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

A. Wahid, “Restorative Justice: An Effort to Discover Substantive Justice,” Jurnal Ius Constituendum, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2023.

W. Subroto et al., “Dynamics of Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Between Substantive Justice and Procedural Formalism,” Jurnal Abdimas Peradaban, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022.

D. M. K. Ningsih, W. Nugrahaningsih, and R. Rezi, “Substantive Justice and Sentencing Theory in Assault Court Decisions,” Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 45–60, 2024.

H. Istirahat, “Reconstruction of the Judge’s Role in Realizing Substantive Justice in Indonesian Courts,” Yudhistira: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 23–38, 2024.

T. Vandini, “Implementation of Nominee Agreements in the Perspective of Indonesian Law,” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 112–125, 2025.

I. S. Pandin et al., “Exploration of Civil Law Aspects in Nominee Agreements Related to Investment,” Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 55–70, 2025.

Indira, “Liability of Nominee Directors in Money Laundering Crimes,” Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 89–104, 2024.

K. M. Herawati, “Notary Liability and Legal Certainty in Settlement of Land Ownership Disputes by Foreigners Due to Nominee Agreements,” Jurnal Yustitia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 134–150, 2021.

D. Masithoh, Legal Consequences of Nominee Agreements in the Sale and Purchase of Freehold Land Rights by Foreign Nationals in Indonesia, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia, 2019.