Vol 6 No 2 (2020): June
Business Law

General Confiscation on Bankcrupty and Confiscation on Criminal Verdict
Sita Umum berdasarkan Kepailitan dan Sita berdasarkan Putusan pidana


Victoria Pasari Putri
fakultas hukum universitas airlangga magister kenotariatan, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Published February 13, 2021
Keywords
  • general confiscation,
  • bankcrupty,
  • criminal confiscation,
  • verdict
How to Cite
Putri, V. P. (2021). General Confiscation on Bankcrupty and Confiscation on Criminal Verdict. Rechtsidee, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2020.6.226

Abstract

General confiscation of bankruptcy and criminal confiscation often occur simultaneously, this has led to debate on both sides between the prosecutor and the curator. Prerihal who is most entitled to the property of palilit and confiscated goods into a long discussion. However, if explained clearly, it will be found that public confiscation can precede criminal confiscation. In this journal, the author tries to discuss the substance and outline of the forgery by using normative writing procedures and applicable statutory regulations. In terms of the benefits of the debt and debt problem can be resolved as soon as possible and as fair as possible so that the economy is disrupted, both economies of a small scale and economies of large scale by continuing to pay attention to the Principle of Proportionality which consumes rights and obligations so that everything is in context and achieves goals that are expected to be fair to every one. In terms of legal certainty, Article 31 of the KPKPU Law that mentions all confiscations, appointed when the debtor's bankruptcy is pronounced is a new regulation and a special regulation compared to the confiscation of criminal provisions contained in
Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Apeldoorn, L.J. Van Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Cetakan Ke-29, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2001.
  2. Anisah, Siti, Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia
  3. studi Putusan-Putusan Pengadilan, Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2008.
  4. Fuady, Munir, Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Cetakan 1, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti,
  5. Hamzah, Andi Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
  6. Harahap, M. Yahya Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian
  7. dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cetakan Keempat, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006
  8. Harahap, M. Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. ed. II. cet. II (Jakarta:
  9. Sinar Grafika, 2006)
  10. Harahap, M. Yahya, Pembahasan, Permasalahan, dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid I, Cetakan Kedua,
  11. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini, 1988.
  12. Marwan, M dan Jimmy P., Kamus Hukum Dictionary Of Law Complete Edition,Cetakan I,
  13. Surabaya: Reality Plubisher, 2009.
  14. Mertokusumo, Sudikno , Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Revisi, Yogyakarta: Cahaya
  15. Atma Pustaka, 2010
  16. Shubhan, Hadi M.Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Pengadilan, Jakarta: Kencana
  17. Prenada Media Group, 2012
  18. Susanto, Retno Wulansari dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan
  19. Praktek, Cetakan Kesepuluh, Bandung: Mancar Maju, 2005.
  20. Sofyan, Andi dan Abd. Asis, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta:
  21. Prenadamedia Group, 2014
  22. Yusuf, Asep Warlan, Hukum dan Keadilan, Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2, Nomor 1,