Rechtsidee
Vol 11 No 2 (2023): December
Notarial Law

Addressing Multi-Unit Residential Management Conflicts: A Legal Study
Mengatasi Konflik Pengelolaan Hunian Multi-Unit: Sebuah Studi Hukum

  • Berlinaldo Patanroi*
Berlinaldo Patanroi
Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1006


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 19, 2023
Keywords
  • Residential Management,
  • Legal Dualism,
  • Preventive Protection,,
  • Repressive Protection,
  • Regulatory Framework
How to Cite
Patanroi, B. (2023). Addressing Multi-Unit Residential Management Conflicts: A Legal Study. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1006. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.1006

Copyright (c) 2023 Berlinaldo Patanroi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study delves into the legal complexities and challenges arising from the management dualism disputes within the Association of Occupants and Owners of Flat Units (P3SRS) at the Bogor Valley Apartment. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, focusing on the analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through comprehensive library research. Central to this investigation is the exploration of the authority of P3SRS under Article 27 of the Regulation of the Minister of PUPR Number 14 of 2021. The study reveals that the existing dual administrations within the P3SRS lack the legitimate authority to manage the interests of the apartment's owners and residents as stipulated by the regulation. This situation has led to significant legal issues, primarily triggered by the dismissal and replacement of P3SRS management. The research further examines legal protection mechanisms for residents and owners affected by this dualism, highlighting two primary approaches: 'preventive legal protection' through government-led socialization and awareness campaigns, and 'repressive legal protection' as outlined in existing housing laws and regulations. Additionally, the study discusses the role of the independent Notary Honor Council (MKN) in providing legal protection for notaries concerning their civil responsibilities and the creation of legal documents. The findings underscore the necessity for clear regulatory frameworks and effective legal protection strategies to address and mitigate the challenges posed by management dualism in residential unit associations, providing valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and residents of multi-unit dwellings.
Highlights:

  • The study identifies illegal authority in dual residential management structures, highlighting a lack of legitimate power in handling owner and resident interests.
  • It emphasizes the necessity of preventive legal protection, advocating for government-led awareness initiatives to educate communities about residential management laws.
  • The research underscores the importance of repressive legal measures, detailing how existing housing regulations provide protection against management conflicts.

Keywords: Residential Management, Legal Dualism, Preventive Protection, Repressive Protection, Regulatory Framework

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. D. Moh. Syahrul Hermawan, “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Akta Notaris,” J. Ilmu Huk. Qawanin, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020.
  2. A. Rifa’i and A. Iftitah, “Bentuk-Bentuk Pelanggaran Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris,” J. Supremasi, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 4, 2018, doi: 10.35457/supremasi.v8i2.486.
  3. K. Harahap., Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Grafiti Budi Utami, 2005.
  4. D. A. dan A. Abdullah., “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Wasiat (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 394/PK/PDT/2015),” J. Imanot, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021.
  5. H. Kurniawan, Y., & Tanawijaya, “Penerapan Kode Etik Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pembagian Waris No 31 Menurut UUJN No 2 Tahun 2014,” J. Huk. Adigama, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018.
  6. M. S. Bashori, “Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Bagi Notaris yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik,” J. Supremasi, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v6i2.392.
  7. A. S. Hutagalung., “Dinamika Pengaturan Rumah Susun Atau Apartemen,” J. Huk. dan Pembang., vol. 4, no. 34, 2007.
  8. N. F. Rahmani, S. R., & Octarina, “Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah/Rumah Susun sebagai Perlindungan Hukum bagi Penjual dan Pembeli,” J. Supremasi, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unisbablitar.ac.id/index.php/supremasi/article/view/895
  9. Anzdoc, “Efektivitas dan Kualitas Pembangunan Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa (RUSUNAWA),” 2015. https://docplayer.info/348429-Efektivitas-dan-kualitas-pembangunan-rumah-susun-sederhana-sewa-rusunawa-www-solopos-com-rusunawa-semanggi-796.html. (accessed Feb. 23, 2023).
  10. UURusun, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun. 2011.
  11. A. W. & W. P. Ananta, Hukum Bisnis Properti di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo, 2017.
  12. A. S. Hutagalung., Kondominium dan Permasalahannya: Edisi Revisi, et. 1. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2007.
  13. U. Notaris, Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. 2014.
  14. S. dan H. Adjie, Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Penerbit CV. Mandar Maju, 2011.
  15. J. Ibrahim, Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publising, 2011.
  16. E. Dyah, O, S., & A’an, Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research): Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan. Sinar Grafika, 2015.
  17. A. Iftitah, Ed., Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mei 2023. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.
  18. P. PUPR, Permen PUPR Nomor 14 Tahun 2021 tentang Perhimpunan Pemilik dan Penghuni Satuan Rumah Susun. 2021.
  19. L. P. PUPR, Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 14 Tahun 2021 tentang Perhimpunan Pemilik dan Penghuni Satuan Rumah Susun. 2021.
  20. S. Rahardjo., Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis Serta Pengalaman-Pengalaman di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.
  21. K. Afifah, “Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata Terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya,” Lex Renaissence, vol. 1, no. 2, 2017.
  22. UUJN, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas UNdang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. 2016.
  23. KUHPer, “Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata”.
  24. S. Melita Trisnawati, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Penerima Protokol dalam Hal Terjadi Pelanggaran Akta Notaris oleh Notaris Pemberi Protokol yang Telah Meninggal,” NOTARIUS, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019.
  25. P. P. Betty Ivana Prasetyawati, “Peran Kode Etik Notaris dalam Membangun Integritas Notaris di Era 4.0,” NOTARIUS, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022.
  26. I. D. Enggarwati., “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris yang Diperiksa oleh Penyidik dalam Tindak Pidana Keterangan Palsu Pada Akta Otentik,” Universitas Brawijaya, 2015.
  27. P. P. Virgin Venlin Sarapi, Anna S. Wahongan, “Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik,” Lex Priv., vol. IX, no. 2, 2021.