Rechtsidee
Vol 12 No 1 (2024): June
Constitutional Law

Examining the Role of Indonesia's Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator
Menelaah Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia sebagai Legislator Positif

Article View
  • Makhyatul Fikriya,
  • Dewi Sulastri ,
  • Dede Kania,
  • Rania Nurul Rizqia*
Makhyatul Fikriya
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Dewi Sulastri
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Dede Kania
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Rania Nurul Rizqia
Ediburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1022


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published July 9, 2024
Keywords
  • Judicial Review,
  • Positive Legislator,
  • Constitutional Court,
  • Legal Authority,
  • Democracy
How to Cite
Fikriya, M., Sulastri , D., Kania, D., & Rizqia, R. N. (2024). Examining the Role of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislator. Rechtsidee, 12(1), 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1022. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i1.1022

Copyright (c) 2024 Makhyatul Fikriya, Dewi Sulastri , Dede Kania, Rania Nurul Rizqia (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The judicial review process is pivotal in democratic governance, ensuring laws align with constitutional mandates. Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, addressing amendments to Article 169, letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 on Elections, has generated significant legal discourse. This study aims to analyze the legal dynamics within this judicial review, employing a descriptive-analytical methodology with a comparative approach. This involves comparing legal systems across different countries to understand the Constitutional Court's controversial role. Traditionally, the court's authority lies in acting as a negative legislator; however, in this case, it has taken on a role akin to a positive legislator, creating potential conflicts with the legislative body. The findings indicate a debate over the court's authority to add norms, revealing a fundamental tension between the judiciary and legislative functions. This decision introduces new legal implications, highlighting the necessity for further analysis to ensure the realization of substantial democracy. The study fills a knowledge gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the court's expanded role, proposing solutive mechanisms to address the emerging legal challenges and maintain a balanced power dynamic between the judiciary and the legislature. This research underscores the importance of clear delineation of judicial and legislative responsibilities to uphold democratic principles.

Highlights:

  • The court's controversial role in amending election law norms.
  • Debates over the court's authority and legislative implications.
  • Need for solutions to maintain democracy and balance of power.

Keywords: Judicial Review, Positive Legislator, Constitutional Court, Legal Authority, Democracy

Article View

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. S. Al-Fatih, "Akibat Hukum Regulasi Tentang Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Umum Legislatif Dan Pemilihan Presiden," Jurnal Yudisial, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17, 2019. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258.
  2. M. Alief, F. Efendi, and A. Saleh, "Putusan Positive Legislature oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi," Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 622-639, 2023.
  3. M. Belov and A. Tsekov, "Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts," in Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022442-5.
  4. M. R. Bima and I. E. Saputra, "Implication of the Constitutional Court Ruling on the Binding Character of the Election Organizer Ethics Council Decision," Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, vol. 2, no. 6, 2022. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.daengku1363.
  5. E. Boot, "Public Interest," Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.2044.
  6. A. R. Brewer-Carías, "Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators," in Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 930, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2354-2_23.
  7. M. Crouch, "Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia," in Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192870681.003.0011.
  8. N. Garoupa, "Constitutional Review," in The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice: Volume 2, vol. 2, Konstitusi Press Khazanah Peradaban Hukum & Konstitusi, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190469771.013.7.
  9. M. A. Hapsari, "Constitutional Court and Democracy Backsliding in The Post-Pandemic Era," Proceeding The 2nd ICHELSS, pp. 603-611, 2022.
  10. A. M. I. Hartono, R. C. K, F. Rosalia, and H. Hertanto, "MELINTASI HAMBATAN ETIKA: Tinjauan Terhadap Kemandirian dalam Seleksi Penyelenggara Pemilu Pada KPU dan BAWASLU," Journal Publicuho, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1276-1287, 2023. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v6i4.256.
  11. C. P. Hong, L. P. Quinn, J. S. Ananda, O. Kharisma, and T. H. Sitabuana, "Review of the Authority of the House of Representatives in Removing Constitutional Court Judges," QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 768-771, 2023. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.472.
  12. B. Isnaeni, "Trias Politica dan Implikasinya dalam Struktur Kelembagaan Negara dalam UUD 1945 Pasca Amandemen," Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 78, 2021. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v6i2.839.
  13. A. A. Lina, A. B. Aji, H. T. Negara, and U. H. Bangsa, "Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90 / PUU- XXI / 2023 Terhadap Sistem Demokrasi di Indonesia," Jurnal Hukum In Concreto, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57-71, 2024. https://doi.org/10.35960/inconcreto.v3i1.1314.
  14. A. E. E. Mahanani, "Impresi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Bersifat Positive Legislature Ditinjau dari Progresivitas Hukum dan Teori Pemisahan Kekuasaan," Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 421, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v54i2.920.
  15. S. Malian, "Perkembangan Lembaga-Lembaga Negara di Indonesia," Kreasi Total Media, 2022.
  16. P. M. Marzuki, "Penelitian Hukum," Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.
  17. M. A. Maulidi, "Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi," Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 339, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1627.
  18. R. M. Mihradi, D. B. Dermawati, N. Lathif, and T. Marselina, "The Decision of the Constitutional Court Which Is Positive Legislature and Their Implications on Substantial Democracy in Indonesia," International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 191, 2021. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3269.
  19. S. Muja’hidah, A. S. P. Syamsuddin, and A. Kasim, "Comparative Study of the Customary Institutional Structure of Ngata Toro, Central Sulawesi, and Montesquieu’s Legal Doctrine," E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 440, pp. 1-10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344004015.
  20. N. Nurhidayati, M. Maharani, and F. Lubis, "Implementasi Bantuan Hukum Pro Bono dan Pro Deo Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia," As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 569-581, 2023. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v5i2.2791.
  21. H. Permadi and O. P. W. W. "Konflik Kepentingan Dalam Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU/XXI/2023," MAKSIGAMA, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 113-129, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37303/maksigama.v17i2.149.
  22. Pusat Pemantauan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang, 2023.
  23. A. R. Putri and A. E. E. Mahanani, "Putusan Positive Legislature pada Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya terhadap Asas Erga Omnes Praktik Rangkap Jabatan yang Dilakukan Wakil Menteri," Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 62, 2022. https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v2i1.13906.
  24. Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 2/MKMK/L/11/2023, 2023.
  25. R. F. Syah and A. T. Sapada, "The Independence and Accountability of the Constitutional Court in the Constitutional System in Indonesia," SIGn Jurnal Hukum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 247-260, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v4i2.166.
  26. D. Ritonga, A. Fitrian, and G. Hendro, "Execution of Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court With Permanent Legal Force (Inkracht)," Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (Polri), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 35-44, 2022. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i3.249.
  27. E. Santio and B. J. Nasution, "Analisis Kewenangan Presiden Republik Indonesia di Bidang Legislatif Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945," Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 152-169, 2021.
  28. I. Satriawan and T. Lailam, "Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang," Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 559, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636.
  29. M. L. C. Situmorang and S. Suteki, "Ultra Petita Decision of the Constitutional Court in Test Constitution (Something Perspective Law Progressive)," International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 5149-5159, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i11-45.
  30. R. Subandri, "Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Persyaratan Batas Usia Pencalonan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden," Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 135-153, 2024.
  31. A. Sumodiningrat, "Constitutional Court’s Decision as Political Legal Perspective in Legislative Branch: Penguatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Politik Hukum Legislatif," Jurnal Konstitusi, 2023.
  32. O. Suparman, "Konsep Lembaga Negara Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Trias Politica Berdasarkan Prinsip Checks and Balances System," Ahkam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59-75, 2023. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i1.898.
  33. T. O. Tobore, "On Power And Its Corrupting Effects: The Effects Of Power On Human Behavior And The Limits Of Accountability Systems," Communicative & Integrative Biology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2023.2246793.
  34. E. E. Tonkov, N. A. Kosolapova, V. Р. Lebedinskaya, S. Sh. Mutsalov, and O. V. Stulnikova, "The Legal Nature of Decisions of Constitutional Courts of Russia and Foreign Countries and Investigating its Psychological Consequences," Propósitos y Representaciones, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n2.508.