Rechtsidee
Vol 12 No 2 (2024): December
Constitutional Law

Streamlining Regional Regulations with Omnibus Law for Legal Harmonization
Penyederhanaan Peraturan Daerah dengan Omnibus Law untuk Harmonisasi Hukum

Article View
  • Purwanto Purwanto*,
  • Sulaksono Sulaksono,
  • Tamsil Tamsil,
  • Dicky Eko Prasetio
Purwanto Purwanto
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia *
Sulaksono Sulaksono
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Tamsil Tamsil
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Dicky Eko Prasetio
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v13i1.1038


Published December 26, 2024
Keywords
  • Omnibus Law,
  • Regional Regulations,
  • Legal Reconstruction,
  • Regulatory Efficiency,
  • Governance Harmonization
How to Cite
Purwanto, P., Sulaksono, S., Tamsil, T., & Prasetio, D. E. (2024). Streamlining Regional Regulations with Omnibus Law for Legal Harmonization. Rechtsidee, 12(2), 10.21070/jihr.v13i1.1038. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v13i1.1038

Copyright (c) 2024 Purwanto Purwanto, Sulaksono Sulaksono, Tamsil Tamsil, Dicky Eko Prasetio (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Background: Regional regulations (Perda) in Indonesia often face issues of overlap and inefficiency. Specific Background: The Omnibus Law method, known for simplifying and harmonizing regulations, has been applied nationally but remains underexplored locally. Knowledge Gap: Its practical application at the regional level, including challenges and opportunities, lacks sufficient research. Aims: This study examines the legal reconstruction of Perda using the Omnibus Law to improve regulatory efficiency and alignment with national laws. Results: The method streamlines regulations, enhances coherence, and boosts legal certainty but faces challenges such as stakeholder resistance and capacity limitations. Novelty: The research highlights the method's transformative potential for resolving Indonesia's regulatory complexities. Implications: It advocates for capacity-building, participatory processes, and effective oversight to achieve cohesive and responsive governance.

Highlights:

  • Regulatory Simplification: The Omnibus Law integrates overlapping regional laws into a single, cohesive framework.
  • Challenges: Stakeholder resistance and limited local capacity hinder effective implementation.
  • Opportunities: Enhances legal certainty and fosters better alignment with national regulations.

Keywords: Omnibus Law, Regional Regulations, Legal Reconstruction, Regulatory Efficiency, Governance Harmonization

Article View

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. G. A. Kurniawan and L. de D. M. Lulo, "Legal Protection Orientation and Formulation for Traditional Musical Instruments as Patents: An Inclusive Legal Paradigm," Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 325–339, 2023.
  2. K. Kriswanto, "Harmonisasi Hukum di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Pembangunan," Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 37, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.32332/istinbath.v19i02.4763.
  3. H. Helmi, "Penataan Peraturan Daerah dengan Metode Omnibus Law: Urgensi dan Mekanisme," Undang: Jurnal Hukum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 441–472, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.22437/ujh.4.2.441-472.
  4. B. D. Anggono, "Peluang Adopsi dan Tantangannya dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia," RechtsVinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–37, 2020.
  5. J. Pramono, Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Surakarta, Indonesia: UNISRI Press, 2020.
  6. P. Adhisatya and S. U. Firdaus, "Penerapan Omnibus Law dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia," Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, vol. 5, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.20961/respublica.v5i3.58461.
  7. M. F. Nadzir and A. Firdaus, "Rejection Demonstration of UU Cipta Kerja Omnibus Law in Perspective of Ralf Dahrendorf’s Conflict Theory," in International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH), vol. 618, pp. 1–5, 2021.
  8. F. Kurniyasih and I. Setyorini, "Penerapan Metode Omnibus Law dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja," Transformasi Hukum, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.59579/transformasihukum.v1i1.2790.
  9. T. Prasetyo, Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Bandung, Indonesia: Nusa Media, 2019.
  10. F. Amin et al., Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Banten, Indonesia: PT. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.
  11. F. P. Disantara et al., "The Integralistic State Idea: Reconstruction of Administrative Efforts Perspective," Jurnal Daulat Hukum, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 130, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.30659/jdh.v6i2.30982.
  12. G. A. Kurniawan, "The Reconstruction of Subjectum Litis in Terms of Reflections on Constitutional Dissolution of Political Parties," Jurnal Akta, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 104–119, 2022, doi: 10.30659/akta.v9i1.20970.
  13. Mulyani, "Menggagas Penataan Regulasi dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah dengan Konsep Omnibus Law," Juridica: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 61–78, May 2022, doi: 10.46601/juridica.v3i2.198.
  14. D. Anggono and F. R. Firdaus, "Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Comparison to the United States and Ireland," Lentera Hukum, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 319–336, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.19184/ejlh.v7i3.19895.
  15. Efendi and F. P. Disantara, "Post Conditionally Unconstitutional of Job Creation Law: Quo Vadis Legal Certainty?," Yuridika, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 329–366, 2022, doi: 10.20473/ydk.v37i2.33364.
  16. M. R. Rantepadang, A. Ilmar, and L. Palullungan, "Urgensi Naskah Akademik dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah di Kota Makassar," Paulus: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum, vol. 1, no. 2, 2024.
  17. Suntoro and K. R. Nureda, "Omnibus Law: Dominasi Kekuasaan Eksekutif dalam Pembentukan Legislasi," Veritas et Justitia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 109–139, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.25123/vej.v8i1.4340.
  18. R. Widiatmika, A. A. A. N. S. R. Gorda, I. G. A. Kurniawan, and S. M. Huzaif, "The Problems Related to Potential Trademark Rights Infringement: Construction in Inclusive Legal Perspective on Unregistered Marks," Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 499–513, 2023, doi: 10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.3.3724.
  19. S. Rokilah, "Penerapan Asas Hukum dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan," Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–190, 2021.
  20. W. Tanggono, K. Sudarmanto, M. Junaidi, and Z. Arifin, "Mekanisme Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah yang Berkualitas di Pemerintah Daerah," Jurnal Juridika, vol. 1, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.26623/jj.v1i3.8051.
  21. N. Sulistiyaningsih, A. N. Fathullah, and M. Apriandhini, "Implementasi Public Trust Doctrine dalam Pengambilan Kebijakan di Tingkat Daerah dan Pusat: Tantangan dan Peluang di Indonesia," Jurnal Esensi Hukum, vol. 5, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.35586/jsh.v5i2.275.
  22. Halpin, A. Vromen, M. Vaughan, and M. Raissi, "Online Petitioning and Politics: The Development of Change.org in Australia," Australian Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10361146.2018.1499010.
  23. N. Mas Aryani, A. Putu, L. Danyathi, and B. Hermanto, "Quo Vadis Protection of the Basic Rights of Indonesian Workers: Highlighting the Omnibus Legislation and Job Creation Law," Pandecta Research Law Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2022, doi: 10.1017/S0010417517000044.3.
  24. Ramadhan, "Omnibus Law sebagai Sarana Utama Penataan Regulasi," Yurispruden: Jurnal Hukum, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 172, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.33474/yur.v3i2.6684.
  25. N. D. Wibawa, "Implementasi Omnibus Law dalam Perumusan Ulang Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia," Souvereignty: Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional, vol. 2, no. 2, 2023.
  26. G. A. Andani, N. M. I. C. Gorda, and A. A. N. S. R. Gorda, "Formulating YouTube Accounts as a Collateral Object: A Progressive Legal Perspective," Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 332–346, 2023, doi: 10.24815/kanun.v25i2.32298.
  27. Freeman and S. Quirke, "Understanding E-Democracy Government-Led Initiatives for Democratic Reform," eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government (JeDEM), vol. 5, no. 2, 2013, doi: 10.29379/jedem.v5i2.221.
  28. N. A. Febriani and R. M. Wasti, "Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pasca Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011," Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35–58, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6483.
  29. G. A. Kurniawan, L. de D. M. Lulo, and F. P. Disantara, "IUS Constituendum of Expert Advisor in Commodity Futures Trading: A Legal Certainty," Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2023, doi: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1170.
  30. R. G. Monitasari, E. Furqon, and E. Khaerunnisa, "Implikasi Penerapan Metode Omnibus Law dalam Sistem Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011," Jurnal Dealiktika Hukum, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021.
  31. U. Rauta, T. S. Kurnia, and A. Siswanto, "Telaah Teoretis dan Yuridis Tukar Menukar Barang Milik Daerah dengan Swasta," Jurnal Hukum IUS Quia Iustum, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 232–254, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art4.