Vol 13 No 2 (2025): December
Criminal Law

Criminal Law Enforcement against Illegal Gold Mining (Study of Decision No. 153/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Mdl)
Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Pertambangan Emas Ilegal (Studi Putusan No. 153/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Mdl)

Xhifa Mayputeri Melati
Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia *
Budi Sastra Panjaitan
Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published July 19, 2025
Keywords
  • Illegal Mining,
  • Law Enforcement,
  • Community Justice,
  • Court Decision,
  • Humanistic Approach
How to Cite
Melati, X. M., & Panjaitan, B. S. (2025). Criminal Law Enforcement against Illegal Gold Mining (Study of Decision No. 153/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Mdl). Rechtsidee, 13(2), 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1066. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1066
 

Abstract

General Background: Illegal gold mining has long served as a vital economic lifeline for communities in Lingga Bayu District, Mandailing Natal Regency. Specific Background: Despite its deep-rooted presence and socio-economic significance, such mining activities persist without formal governmental authorization, creating tension between legal norms and community livelihoods. Knowledge Gap: Existing legal enforcement often emphasizes punitive action, yet overlooks the structural socio-economic challenges faced by traditional miners. Aims: This study examines the implementation of criminal law enforcement against illegal gold mining and evaluates the fairness and justice outcomes of Decision Number 153/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mdl by the Mandailing Natal District Court. Results: Findings indicate that while law enforcement adheres to normative legal standards and ensures legal certainty, it falls short in delivering substantive justice and long-term legal benefits for local miners. Novelty: The study highlights the misalignment between repressive legal mechanisms and the socio-cultural realities of community-based mining practices, advocating for a shift from a purely legalistic approach to one that is humanistic and transformative. Implications: The research suggests a need for integrative legal reform, including affirmative policies for people's mining legalization, to achieve holistic and sustainable justice for marginalized mining communities.

Highlights:

  • Highlights the gap between legal enforcement and local socio-economic realities.

  • Critiques the repressive nature of criminal law against traditional miners.

  • Proposes a transformative and inclusive legal reform model.

Keywords: Illegal Mining, Law Enforcement, Community Justice, Court Decision, Humanistic Approach

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. H. A. Putri, "Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pertambangan Emas Tanpa Izin oleh Kepolisian Sektor Kecamatan Singingi," Jurnal Lex Renaissance, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 863–876, 2020, doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss4.art8.
  2. T. Murty and H. Yuningsih, "Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penambangan Timah Ilegal di Provinsi Bangka Belitung," YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2016.
  3. B. S. Panjaitan, "Pembentukan Pengadilan Pertanahan Sebagai Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan," Bina Hukum Lingkungan, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 264–273, 2020, doi: 10.24970/bhl.v4i2.130.
  4. A. F. D. Putri and M. H. Prasetyo, "Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana di Bidang Pertambangan," Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 312–324, 2021, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v3i3.312-324.
  5. B. S. Panjaitan, "Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup oleh Advokat: Environmental Law Enforcement by Advocate," Bina Hukum Lingkungan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–92, 2021, doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss4.art9.
  6. N. Y. S. Tutuarima, D. J. A. Hehanussa, and M. G. Sopacua, "Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kegiatan Pertambangan Tanpa Izin," TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 1263–1269, 2022, doi: 10.24970/bhl.v4i2.112.
  7. D. O. Ariyanti, M. Ramadhan, and J. S. Murdomo, "The Criminal Law Enforcement Against Illegal Sand Mining Actors," Jambura Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–47, 2020, doi: 10.33756/jalrev.v2i1.4376.
  8. C. M. P. Ulpa, J. Abdilla, and A. F. Gunawan, "Tinjauan Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Kegiatan Penambang Ilegal di Dalam Kawasan Taman Hutan Raya Bukit Mangkol Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara," Jurnal Legalitas, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–62, 2023, doi: 10.58819/jurnallegalitas(jle).v1i2.108.
  9. B. Bugin, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
  10. J. Sarwono, Mixed Methods: Cara Menggabung Riset Kuantitatif dan Riset Kualitatif Secara Benar, Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo, 2011.
  11. N. A. Hardani, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu, 2020.
  12. A. Redi, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
  13. A. Muhammad, "Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum," Law Reform, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 134–145, 2004, doi: 10.20961/hpe.v6i2.1769.
  14. F. Ennandrianita and I. G. A. K. R. I. Handayani, "Politik Hukum Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara Saat Berlaku Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah," Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 35–54, 2018, doi: 10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17694.
  15. D. R. Wandayati and N. R. Siregar, "Wilayah Pertambangan Pasca UU No. 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara di Masa yang Akan Datang," Paradigma: Jurnal Multidisipliner Mahasiswa Pascasarjana, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2020, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v3i3.312-3.