Vol 5 No 2 (2019): June
Constitutional Law

Indonesia Regional Representative Council Authority After Constitutional Court Decision No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012


Bukhori Bukhori
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Indonesia *
Nizla Rohaya
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Published December 2, 2019
Keywords
  • Decision of the Constitutional Court,
  • People's Representative Council,
  • Regional Representative Council,
  • Power,
  • State
How to Cite
Bukhori , B., & Rohaya, N. (2019). Indonesia Regional Representative Council Authority After Constitutional Court Decision No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012. Rechtsidee, 5(2). Retrieved from https://rechtsidee.umsida.ac.id/index.php/rechtsidee/article/view/64

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the position, role and function of the DPD-RI in the Indonesian constitutional system before and after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012. The research method used is juridical normative and type of research is statutory approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The results showed that a number of laws and regulations governing the DPD-RI were still less than the initial purpose of the formation of the DPD-RI. Certain articles relating to the position, function and role of the DPD-RI actually limit the authority of the DPD-RI so that it cannot function as a state institution that should have the same position as the DPR-RI. The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012 brings a new chapter in the implementation of democracy in Indonesia. The ruling of the Constitutional Court firmly provides a strategic role for the Regional Representative Council in Indonesian constitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ali, Zainudin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
  2. Andryan. "Implikasi Putusan Hak Uji Materil di Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Legalitas Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia." Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 2018: 1410-5632.
  3. Burhan, Wirman. Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan : Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.
  4. Golap, Mulyadi. "Eksistensi Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara republik Indonesia 1945." Jurnal Noken, 2017: 35-70.
  5. Halim, A. Ridwan. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2007.
  6. Heri Herdiawanto, Fokky Fuad Wasitaatmadja dan Jumanta Hamdayama. Kewarganegaraan dan Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.
  7. —. Spiritualisme Pancasila. Jakarta: UAI Press, 2018.
  8. Panjaitan, Kristiani Elisabeth, Ratna Herawati, and Untung Sri Hardjanto. "Pelaksanaan Fungsi Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia Periode 2009-2014." Diponegoro Law Journal, 2017: 1-20.
  9. Rosidi, Ahmad. "Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945." Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 2015: 200-380.
  10. Rozak, A. Ubaedillah dan Abdul. Pancasila, Demokrasi, HAM, dan Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
  11. Soekamto, Soejono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
  12. Soemitro, Roni Hanitjo. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1982.
  13. Sunarno, Siswanto. Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
  14. Ubaedillah, A. Pancasila: Demokrasi dan Pencegahan Korupsi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
  15. —. Pancasila: Demokrasi dan Pencegahan Korupsi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
  16. Yusuf, Daud, Thommor Rudy, and Thomas Lamury Edward Hadjon. "Implikasi Dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012 Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Tugas, Fungsi Dan Kewenangan DPD." Universitas Udayana, 2018: 1-15.