Rechtsidee
Vol 8 (2021): June
Customary Law

The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law
Strategi Pluralisme Hukum Peradilan Adat Sendi dalam Era Modernisasi Hukum

View Article
  • Dicky Eko Prasetio*,
  • Fradhana Putra Disantara,
  • Nadia Husna Azzahra,
  • Dita Perwitasari
Dicky Eko Prasetio
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia *
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Nadia Husna Azzahra
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Dita Perwitasari
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 9, 2021
Keywords
  • Integration,
  • Custom Society,
  • Legal Pluralism
How to Cite
Prasetio, D. E., Disantara, F. P., Azzahra, N. H., & Perwitasari, D. (2021). The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law. Rechtsidee, 8, 10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702

Copyright (c) 2021 Dicky Eko Prasetio, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Nadia Husna Azzahra, Dita Perwitasari (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The Sendi customary community is a community that has procedures for implementing customary law through the customary justice system. Not only that, the Sendi customary community also has a distinctive legal code and customary apparatus; so that its existence needs to be maintained in the face of the era of legal modernization. This research is an empirical legal research; by using secondary data types obtained from various searches for journal articles, books, and information through online news online; relating to the substance of the research. The purpose of this research is to describe the structure of Sendi's customary court in maintaining the existence of customary law; as well as describing the strategy of legal pluralism in Sendi's customary court to face modernization of law era. This empirical legal research focuses on the structure of Sendi's customary court with an approach of legal pluralism. The results of the study confirm that a legal pluralism strategy is needed to maintain the existence of the Sendi traditional court in the era of legal modernization; and integration efforts are needed between the law and the customary apparatus of Sendi with the law and the national or state apparatus.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. J. Jany, Legal Traditions in Asia: History, Concepts and Laws. Cham: Springer Nature, 2020.
  2. B. B. Priambodo, “Positioning Adat Law in the Indonesia’s Legal System: Historical Discourse and Current Development on Customary Law,” Udayana J. Law Cult., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 140, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.24843/UJLC.2018.v02.i02.p02.
  3. M. Fitzmaurice and P. Merkouris, Treaties in Motion: The Evolution of Treaties from Formation to Termination. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  4. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, and N. H. Azzahra, “Peradilan Adat Sendi: Mutiara di Balik Tirai Hukum Negara,” Gresnews.com, 2020. https://www.gresnews.com/berita/opini/118478-peradilan-adat-sendi-mutiara-di-balik-tirai-hukum-negara/ (accessed Aug. 30, 2020).
  5. I. Arlado, “Perjuangan Warga Sendi, ‘Desa’ Adat di Mojokerto, Mengejar Pengakuan,” Jawa Pos, 2018. https://www.jawapos.com/features/21/08/2018/perjuangan-warga-sendi-desa-adat-di-mojokerto-mengejar-pengakuan/.
  6. A. H. Romadhon, I. Harianti, N. Royhana, and M. Agustina, “DINAMIKA PRANATA PEMERINTAHAN DESA ADAT DALAM DIMENSI HUKUM TATA NEGARA,” J. Huk. MEDIA BHAKTI, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–137, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.32501/jhmb.v2i2.31.
  7. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, and N. H. Azzahra, “Menanti Legalisasi Desa Adat Sendi, Sampai Kapan?,” mediajatim.com, 2020. https://mediajatim.com/2020/09/30/menanti-legalisasi-desa-adat-sendi-sampai-kapan/ (accessed Oct. 01, 2020).
  8. M. De Lemos, “LEGAL PLURALISM AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: INTRODUCTORY NOTES ON THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE TWO CONCEPTS.,” Humanit. RIGHTS | Glob. Netw. J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 190–233, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.24861/2675-1038.v2i1.31.
  9. Amirullah, “YLBHI: 51 Anggota Masyarakat Adat Dikriminalisasi Sepanjang 2019,” tempo.co, 2019. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1281756/ylbhi-51-anggota-masyarakat-adat-dikriminalisasi-sepanjang-2019/full&view=ok.
  10. E. Saptiyulda, “Buka Dokumen HGU untuk Tuntaskan Persoalan Tata Kelola Hutan,” antaranews.com, 2019. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/805339/buka-dokumen-hgu-untuk-tuntaskan-persoalan-tata-kelola-hutan.
  11. I. N. Riza, I. Harianti, Suyatno, and M. Zamroni, “ASPEK HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BATAS WILAYAH DESA SENDI DI KABUPATEN MOJOKERTO,” Mimb. YUSTITIA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 223-236., 2018, [Online]. Available: http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/mimbar/article/view/1550.
  12. F. Arofah, “Kesadaran Kolektif dan Upaya Menuntut Pengakuan Desa Adat: Kasus Masyarakat Adat Sendi di Mojokerto, Jawa Timur,” JISPO J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75–86, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.15575/jispo.v10i1.6665.
  13. I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada media Group, 2016.
  14. G. T. Suteki, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, dan Praktik), 1st ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  15. P. Kuruk, Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources, Customary Law and Intellectual Property: A Global Primer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
  16. S. Rahardjo, Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.
  17. N. Johnson, “Legality’s Law’s Empire,” Law Philos., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 325–349, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10982-020-09374-7.
  18. A. Bedner and Y. Arizona, “Adat in Indonesian Land Law: A Promise for the Future or a Dead End?,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 416–434, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246.
  19. W. Lucy, “Access to Justice and the Rule of Law,” Oxf. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 377–402, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqaa012.
  20. P. F. P. Pratiwi, Suprayitno, and Triyani, “Existence of Customary Law through Comparative Education between Dayak Ngaju Customary Law and National Law,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Inst. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.882.
  21. G. Tusseau, Ed., Debating Legal Pluralism and Constitutionalism: New Trajectories for Legal Theory in the Global Age. New York: Springer Nature, 2020.
  22. I. Darmawan, “Eksistensi Kitab Kuno Nusantara (Suatu Refleksi dan Proyeksi Terhadap Hukum Nasional),” Pakuan Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1689–1699, 2020, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  23. Y. U. O. Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Hikmahanto Juwana, Ed., Law And Justice in And Globalized World, 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2018.
  24. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, and N. H. Azzahra, “Kitab Kutaramanawa Dharmasastra dan Supremasi Konstitusi Jaman Majapahit,” beritajatim.com, 2020. https://beritajatim.com/postingan-anda/kitab-kutaramanawa-dharmasastra-dan-supremasi-konstitusi-jaman-majapahit/ (accessed Oct. 03, 2020).
  25. E. Sudyar, Ed., Kumpulan Sejarah Desa Se-Kab. Mojokerto. Batu: Beta Aksara, 2020.
  26. F. Kautsar, “Tak Diakui Negara, Masyarakat Desa Sendi: Dengan Adat Kami Berjuang Dapat Pengakuan.” mongabay.co.id, 2018.
  27. M. Jamin, Mulyanto, and S. T. Widodo, “Reformulation of a legal policy affirming recognition of Indigenous community units,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 473–490, 2020.
  28. O. S. Ladeinova, “Moral-Philosophical Expertise as a Tool of Evolution of Law (A Case Study of Program-Strategic Documents),” Actual Probl. Russ. Law, no. 7, pp. 21–26, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2019.104.7.021-026.
  29. O. Rosadi and A. Marwan, “Transformation of Legal Education in Indonesia Based on Social Justice,” J. Polit. Law, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 143, 2020, doi: 10.5539/jpl.v13n1p143.
  30. O. Chasapis Tassinis, “Customary International Law: Interpretation from Beginning to End,” Eur. J. Int. Law, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 235–267, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chaa026.
  31. A. Budiono and W. V. Izziyana, “Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Keilmuan Perspektif Paradigma Holistik,” J. Huk. Nov., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 89, 2018, doi: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a6916.
  32. G. Gharios, “Legal Pluralism and Un-Official Law in Lebanon: Evolution and Sustainable Development of Water,” Water Policy, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 348–364, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.2166/wp.2020.224.
  33. D. Klimchuk, I. Samet, and H. E. Smith, Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Equity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  34. D. ter Haar, Asas-Asas dan Susunan Hukum. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2017.
  35. G. Swenson, “Legal pluralism in theory and practice,” Int. Stud. Rev., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 438–462, 2018, doi: 10.1093/ISR/VIX060.
  36. W. F. Menski, Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  37. P. Naso, E. Bulte, and T. Swanson, “Legal Pluralism in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone,” Eur. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 61, pp. 1–21, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.101819.
  38. H. B. A. Sani, “State Law and Legal Pluralism: Towards an Appraisal,” J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 82–109, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/07329113.2020.1727726.
  39. N. Bose and V. V. Ramraj, “Lex Mercatoria, Legal Pluralism, and the Modern State through the Lens of the East India Company, 1600–1757,” Comp. Stud. South Asia, Africa Middle East, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 277–290, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1215/1089201X-8524204.
  40. J. Corrin, “Plurality and Punishment: Competition Between State and Customary Authorities in Solomon Islands,” J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 29–47, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07329113.2018.1540121.
  41. M. Sadyrbek, Legal Pluralism in Central Asia: Local Jurisdiction and Customary Practices. New York: Routledge, 2017.
  42. S. Sabrow, “Non-Enforcement as a Tool of Mediation in Pluralistic Societies,” J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 154–179, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/07329113.2020.1796296.
  43. K. von Benda-Beckmann and B. Turner, “Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and The State,” J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 255–274, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674.