Vol 7 (2020): December
Constitutional Law

The Existence of Islamic Norms in the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decisions No.22/PUU-XV/2017
Eksistensi Norma Islam dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia No.22/PUU-XV/2017

Lindi Rohma Octavia
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 23, 2020
Keywords
  • Constitutional Court,
  • consideration,
  • marriage,
  • age
How to Cite
Octavia, L. R., & Phahlevy, R. R. (2020). The Existence of Islamic Norms in the Indonesia Constitutional Court Decisions No.22/PUU-XV/2017. Rechtsidee, 7, 10.21070/jihr.2020.7.720. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2020.7.720
 

Abstract

This study discusses the existence of Islamic norms in the Constitutional Court decisions. This study uses a case approach by examining the Constitutional Court decision no. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. Data obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary data relating to legal issues in this paper. The main problem in this research is the consideration and decision of the Constitutional Court on the case decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 concerning marriage which is quite highlighted by the Indonesian people. What was tested in the a quo decision was article 7 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage with article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution as a touchstone. In the a quo decision the petitioners argued that article 7 paragraph (1) was an article that was discriminatory for women. On the a quo decision, the panel of judges granted part of the petition's petition. the legal consequence of the Constitutional Court decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017 is the emergence of Law No. 16 of 2019, amendments to Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning marriage

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. B. Sutiyoso, “Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 25–50, 2010.
  2. T. G. Lumbun, “Tindak lanjut putusan Mahkamah Kostitusi Oleh Dpr Ri,” pp. 77–94.
  3. A. A. Musyafah, F. Hukum, and U. Diponegoro, “Dasar Hukum Islam Bersifat Normatif Di Indonesia,” 1945.
  4. R. Septarini and U. Salami, “Analisa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Batas Usia Nikah Bagi Perempuan,” vol. 8, no. 1, 2019.
  5. X. Nugraha, R. Izzaty, and A. A. Putri, “Rekonstruksi Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40–54, 2019.
  6. N. Amania, “Analisis Yuridis Putusan MK No. 22/PUU-XV/2017 Serta Relevansinya Dengan Perlindungan Anak,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2013, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  7. A. Wahyuni, “Pernikahan Dini Menurut Perspektif Madzhab Imam Syafi’I,” Imtiyaz: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62–85, 2020, doi: 10.46773/imtiyaz.v4i1.65.
  8. N. iftiah Isnantia, “Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara Di Pengadilan”.
  9. Bisariyadi et al., “Penafsiran Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap UUD,” p. viii, 2016.
  10. Azwandi, “Kedewasaan Menikah Prespektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia,” pp. 17–26, 2017.
  11. Amrullah, “Batasan Umur Dalam Melangsungkan Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawianan No. 1 Tahun 1974 Dan Pendapat Imam Syafi’i,” no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1974.
  12. M. Mulia, “Perkawinan Anak Dalam Prespektif Islam Dan Hak kesehatan,” Dk, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2015, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
  13. F. A. Natsif, “Problematika Perkawinan Anak (prespektif hukum islam dan hukum positif),” Journal of Petrology, vol. 369, no. 1, pp. 1689–1699, 2013, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.