Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 1 (2022): June
Constitutional Law

Establishing Ethical Norms: Dignified Justice Theory Perspectives on Ethics and Legal Relations
Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat terhadap Relasi Etika dan Hukum

View Article
  • Fradhana Putra Disantara*,
  • Bayu Dwi Anggono,
  • Aan Efendi
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia *
Bayu Dwi Anggono
Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Aan Efendi
Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 30, 2022
Keywords
  • Ethics Norm,
  • Law,
  • Dignified Justice
How to Cite
Disantara, F. P., Anggono, B. D., & Efendi, A. (2022). Establishing Ethical Norms: Dignified Justice Theory Perspectives on Ethics and Legal Relations. Rechtsidee, 10(1), 10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773

Copyright (c) 2022 Fradhana Putra Disantara, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Aan Efendi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The relationship between ethical norms and legal norms is different for experts, especially concerning their position. Moreover, legal norms seem to be superior to ethical norms. This study aims to analyze the position of ethical norms and legal norms. The dignified justice theory was chosen because it seeks to orient the divine and human aspects, which can only be fulfilled if ethical and legal norms synergize. This research is juridical-normative research. The juridical-normative research was chosen because it confirms the existence of ethical norms and legal norms as part of the system of norms prevailing in society. The study's results confirm that, in practice, legal court decisions are often considered higher and more authoritative than ethical court decisions. This has implications for the position of ethical norms that are considered inferior to legal norms. Furthermore, the theory of dignified justice seeks to see the relationship between ethical norms and legal norms as different norms, but in its implementation in society, the two norms must synergize and complement each other.

 

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, An Introduction to Indonesian Law, 1st ed. Malang: Setara Press, 2011.
  2. N. Irfani, “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 305, 2020, doi: 10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.
  3. E. R. M. Toule, “Rule of Law and Rule of Ethic in Law Enforcement in Indonesia,” Sasi, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 58, 2022.
  4. M. Syam, I. Ismansyah, B. Azheri, and M. Hasbi, “Consumer protection enforcement law characteristics on civil law aspects in Indonesia,” Linguist. Cult. Rev., vol. 5, no. S2, pp. 1471–1481, 2021, doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v5ns2.1976.
  5. B. B. Priambodo, “Positioning Adat Law in the Indonesia’s Legal System: Historical Discourse and Current Development on Customary Law,” Udayana J. Law Cult., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 140, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.24843/UJLC.2018.v02.i02.p02.
  6. T. Reformulasi, K. Ham, R. Miladmahesi, and A. D. S. M, “Evaluasi Peran Penegakan Hukum oleh Lembaga Negara Penunjang ( State Auxiliary Bodies ),” Teropong, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019.
  7. H. M. Said, “Menggagas Peradilan Etik Penyelenggara Negara Di Indonesia,” SASI, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–37, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.47268/sasi.v27i1.266.
  8. H. Salwén, “Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 27, no. 67, p. 68, 2021.
  9. F. P. Disantara, R. Chansrakaeo, M. Jazuli, N. P. Ratnayutika, R. Triastutiek, and C. I. P. Umiasih, “The Enigma of Ethics: Code of Ethics Enforcement on Covid-19 Health Protocol,” LEGA LATA J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.30596/dll.v7i1.8203.
  10. T. Oduol, “Teacher Professional Codes of Ethics of New Zealand and Kenya: A Document Analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 12, p. 150, 2020.
  11. G.-B. SPÎRCHEZ, “The Relation Between Ethics and Law,” Fiat Iustitia, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 191, 2016.
  12. N. A. Sinaga, “Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik,” Ilm. Huk. Durgantara, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 3, 2020.
  13. Miswardi, Nasfi, and Antoni, “Etika, Moralitas dan Penegak Hukum,” Menara Ilmu, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.31869/mi.v15i2.2425.
  14. H. Imam Makmun, Supardin, “Profil Etika Profesi Penegak Hukum Di Indonesia,” Ulil Albab, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 2399, 2022.
  15. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  16. Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Media, 2020.
  17. E. M. Al Amaren, A. M. A. Hamad, O. F. Al Mashhour, and M. I. Al Mashni, “An introduction to the legal research method: To clear the blurred image on how students understand the method of the legal science research,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Adv. Technol., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 50–55, 2020.
  18. J. Asshidiqie, Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi, 1st ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
  19. P. Henz, “Ethical and legal responsibility for Artificial Intelligence,” Discov. Artif. Intell., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 1, 2021.
  20. Herabudin, “Implementation Of Norms And Ethics In Public Services In Indonesia,” J. Ilm. MEA (Manajemen, Ekon. Akuntansi), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 1901, 2022.
  21. K. Page, “Ethics and the co-production of knowledge,” Public Heal. Res Pr., vol. 32, no. 2, p. 2, 2022.
  22. J. Asshiddiqie, “Dinamika Perkembangan Sistem Norma dan Gagasan Peradilan Etika.” .
  23. H. H. Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?,” Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 272, 2022.
  24. S. Jacques, “The Story of Jeremy Bentham on Police: Bridging the Bentham Project to Criminology,” in Jeremy Bentham on Police, London: UCL Press, 2021, p. 12.
  25. J. VEL, Y. ZAKARIA, and A. BEDNER, “Law-Making as a Strategy for Change: Indonesia’s New Village Law,” Asian J. Law Soc., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 451, 2017.
  26. S. I. G. Agaton, “The Kantian Categorical Imperative and Marawi Refugees: Affirming the Importance of the Anti-Terrorism Law,” Masyarakat, Kebud. Dan Polit., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 233, 2022.
  27. A. Rajab, “Kewenangan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Mengaktifkan Kembali Anggota Komisi Pemilihan Umum,” USM Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 345, 2021.
  28. F. P. Disantara, “Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat dalam Paradoks Etika dan Hukum,” J. LITIGASI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 205–229, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4211.
  29. T. Prasetyo, Hukum dan Teori Hukum Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2020.
  30. Shidarta, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum: Buku 1, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.
  31. B. H. Rizky P.P. Karo Karo, Vanesia Ciayadi Kwang, Abraham Ethan and 1, “Covid-19 Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat,” Kaji. Lemb. Ketahanan Nas. Republik Indones., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 377–390, 2020.
  32. T. Prasetyo, Pembaharuan Hukum: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Malang: Setara Press, 2017.
  33. M. Mustamam, “The Position Of Pancasila In The Arrangement Of The Types And Hierarchy Of Laws,” Int. J. Business, Econ. Law, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 453–454, 2020.
  34. A. Efendi and D. O. Susanti, Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2021.
  35. A. Efendi, D. O. Susanti, and N. K. Sari, Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Jember: UPT Percetakan & Penerbitan Universitas Jember, 2018.
  36. B. Aswandi and K. Roisah, “Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham),” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 128, 2019, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145.
  37. B. D. Anggono, Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Penataan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2020.
  38. D. E. P. Hananto Widodo, “Penataan Kewenangan KPU dan Bawaslu dalam Melakukan Pengawasan dan Menangani Sengketa Proses Pemilu,” Perspekt. Huk., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 17–38, 2021.