Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Criminal Law

Reconstruction of the Role From the Prosecutor Based on the Socio-Legal Approach
Rekonstruksi Peran Jaksa Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sosio-Legal

View Article
  • Hamdan Rampadio*
Hamdan Rampadio
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.792


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 27, 2022
Keywords
  • The Prosecutor.,
  • Law Enforcement,
  • Socio-Legal
How to Cite
Rampadio, H. (2022). Reconstruction of the Role From the Prosecutor Based on the Socio-Legal Approach. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.792. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.792

Copyright (c) 2022 Hamdan Rampadio (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The prosecutor is one of the law enforcement officers who have an orientation to enforce the law in society. The prosecutor in this case does not only apply the law in the form of written texts in the Act, but also looks at the context in social-societal reality. This study aims to explore the socio-legal aspects in implementing the duties of the prosecutor in realizing justice in society. This research is a normative legal research by prioritizing socio-legal aspects. This study uses primary legal materials, namely: the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Prosecutor's Law, the Prosecutor's Regulation on Restorative Justice. Secondary legal materials include: books, journal articles, as well as various research results on law enforcement by the Attorney General's Office. Non-legal materials include: various results of non-legal studies on law enforcement by the Attorney General's Office. The approach in this study uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that prosecutors in law enforcement in Indonesia are oriented towards law enforcement tasks in the field, which means that prosecutors need to look at non-legal aspects and understand several aspects of social reality in society to maximally enforce the law in society. The urgency of the socio-legal approach regarding the role of prosecutors in Indonesia is to make prosecutors more comprehensive in understanding legal issues that develop in society.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. M. M Husein, “Penegakan Hukum Dan Perlindungan Negara,” J. Ilmu Polit. dan Komun., vol. VII, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2017.
  2. M. A. Syahrin, “Polarisasi Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian Kontemporer: Aksiologi Normatif - Empiris,” Maj. Huk. Nas., vol. 49, no. 1, p. 60, 2019.
  3. Z. Zulqarnain, M. Ikhlas, and R. Ilhami, “Perception of college students on civic and anti-corruption education : Importance and relevance,” Integritas J. Antikorupsi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2022.
  4. K. S. Wahyuningrum, H. S. Disemadi, and N. S. P. Jaya, “INDEPENDENSI KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI: BENARKAH ADA?,” Refleks. Huk. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 239–258, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p239-258.
  5. M. Iovan, “Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity,” J. Legal Stud., vol. 25, no. 39, pp. 57–68, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.2478/jles-2020-0004.
  6. D. Rato, “Realisme Hukum: Peradilan Adat dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sosial,” J. Kaji. Pembaruan Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 285, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.19184/jkph.v1i2.24998.
  7. S. Bella Andreyani, Hidayatullah, “Kewenangan Rangkap Jaksa Sebagai Penyidik, Penuntut Umum Dan Saksi Pelapor (Verbalisan) Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu,” Suara Keadilan, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 2019.
  8. A. Budiono and W. V. Izziyana, “Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Keilmuan Perspektif Paradigma Holistik,” J. Huk. Nov., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 89, 2018, doi: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a6916.
  9. D. McQuoid-Mason, “Could traditional dispute resolution mechanisms be the solution toreducing the volume of litigation in post-colonial developing countries– particularly in Africa?,” Oñati Socio-Legal Ser., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 591, 2021.
  10. H. Matnuh, “Law as a Tool of Social Engineering,” in 1st International Conference on Social Sciences Education "Multicultural, 2018, vol. 147, no. Icsse 2017, pp. 118–120, doi: 10.2991/icsse-17.2018.28.
  11. R. H. Ook Mufrohim, “Independensi Lembaga Kejaksaan Sebagai Legal Sctructure di dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Criminal Justice Sytem) di Indonesia,” Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 2, no. 3, p. 375, 2020.
  12. S. Ramadhani, “Peran Kejaksaan Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Kejahatan,” Huk. Progresif, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 78, 2021.
  13. A. Rewabawadewa, “Efektivitas Kinerja Jaksa Pengacara Negara dalam Penyelamatan Aset Pemerintah Daerah: Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Negeri Makassar,” Lex Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 95, 2022.
  14. S. G. A. Doederlein and R. A. da Costa, “The development of the Sociology of Law in Brazil,” Oñati J. Emergent Socio-legal Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–79, 2021.
  15. R. Banakar and M. Travers, “Introduction to Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research,” in THEORY AND METHOD IN SOCIAL-LEGAL RESEARCH, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005, pp. 1–8.
  16. A. Angkasa, R. Windiasih, and O. Juanda, “Efektivitas Rancangan Undang-UndangPenghapusan Kekerasan Seksual Sebagai Hukum Positif dalam Perspektif Viktimologi” J. USM LAW Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 117, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.26623/julr.v4i1.2696.
  17. S. Tyrer, “An Australia-Indonesia Arrangement on Refugees: Exploring the structural, legal and diplomatic Dimensions,” Adelaide Law Rev., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 113–147, 2017.
  18. B. Manan, “Peranan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Cita-Cita Keadilan Sosial Menurut UUD 1945,” Varia Peradil., no. 340, p. 5, 2014.
  19. M. Chairul Huda, “Meneguhkan Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Bernegara: Implemetasi Nilai-Nilai Keseimbangan dalam Upaya Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia,” Resolusi J. Sos. Polit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 78–99, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.2489/resolusi.v1i1.160.
  20. S. Munandar, “Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum pada Tahap Penyidikan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Padang),” Pagaruyuang Law J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–63, 2018.
  21. A. Pristiono, “Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy) Dengan Konsep Mediasi Dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum (Penipuan Dan Penggelapan) Pada Bagwassidik Ditreskrimum Polda Sumut,” J. Ilm. Muqoddimah J. Ilmu Sos. Polit. dan Hummanioramaniora, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 34, 2020, doi: 10.31604/jim.v4i1.2020.34-43.
  22. R. R. Antasari, “Telaah Terhadap Perkembangan Tipe Tatanan Hukum Di Indonesia Perspektif Pemikiran Nonet-Selznick Menuju Hukum Yang Berkeadilan,” Nurani J. Kaji. Syari’ah dan Masy., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 103–118, 2019, doi: 10.19109/nurani.v19i1.3344.
  23. Sulaiman, “Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis dalam Pembangunan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia,” Kanun, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 585–601, 2015, doi: 10.24815/kanun.v17i3.6088.
  24. A. Efendi and D. O. Susanti, Logika & Argumentasi Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
  25. E. O. S. Hiariej, Hukum Acara Pidana. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka, 2015.
  26. J. C. Thompson, “Law’s Autonomy and Moral Reason,” Laws, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/laws8010006.
  27. R. S. Rico Yodi Tri Utama, “Independensi Dan Urgensi Restrukturisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Aspek Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” Ajudikasi J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 52–70, 2017.
  28. E. Safudin, “Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Antinomi Hukum (Analisis Terhadap Penerapan Pasal 20 Ayat 2 Huruf B Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” Al-Syakhsiyyah J. Law Fam. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 203–204, 2020.
  29. C. Horn, “Aristotle on the Legal and Moral Aspects of Law,” in Ethics in Ancient Greek Literature, De Gruyter, 2020, pp. 81–100.
  30. I. S. Latif and I. A. Pangestu, “Problematika Penyalahgunaan Bantuan Sosial Pada Masa Pandemi,” Justisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 95–107, 2022, doi: 10.33506/js.v8i2.1612.
  31. H. Christianto, “Norma Persatuan Sebagai Batasan Perbuatan Pidana Penyebaran Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Internet,” Verit. Justitia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 94–126, 2020, doi: 10.25123/vej.3501.
  32. N. M. Nggilu, “Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 43, 2019, doi: 10.31078/jk1613.
  33. Sofyan Hadi, “Kekuatan Mengikat Hukum dalam Perspektif Mazhab Hukum Alam dan Mazhab Positivisme Hukum,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 14, no. 28, pp. 76–84, 2019.
  34. D. E. Prasetio, “Menelisik Perjuangan Artidjo Alkostar: dari Paradigma Hukum Profetik Hingga Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Politik.” syakal.iainkediri.ac.id, Kediri, p. 3, 2021.
  35. M. A. Mahfud, “the Relevance of Ronald Dworkin ’s Theory for Creating Agrarian Justice in Indonesia,” Yustisia, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 385–399, 2019, doi: 10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.27386.
  36. S. Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2010.
  37. N. R. Wildan Nafis, “Hukum Progresif dan Relevansinya Pada Penalaran Hukum di Indonesia,” El Ahli J. Huk. Kel. Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2020.
  38. R. S. Markus Marselinus Soge, “Kajian Hukum Progresif Terhadap Fungsi Pemasyarakatan Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemasyarakatan,” Leg. J. Huk. dan Perundang-Undangan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5–24, 2022.
  39. I. Rahmatullah, “Filsafat Hukum Utilitarianisme: Konsep dan Aktualisasinya Dalam Hukum di Indonesia,” Adalah Bul. Huk. Keadilan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19–32, 2021, doi: 10.15408/adalah.v5i2.22026.
  40. Suteki, Desain Hukum Di Ruang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2015.
  41. S. Syaripuddin, “Maslahat as Considerations of Islamic Law in View Imam Malik,” Samarah J. Huk. Kel. dan Huk. Islam Vol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2020.
  42. S. Irianto, “Praktik Penelitian Hukum: Perspektif Sosiolegal,” in Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi & Refleksi, Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2011, pp. 1–38.
  43. F. Afandi, “Penelitian Hukum Interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi dan Desain Penelitian Sosio-legal,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 240, 2022.
  44. S. Roy, “Theory of Social Proof and Legal Compliance: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for Regulatory (Non) Compliance,” Ger. Law J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 238–255, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.5.
  45. R. Susskind, The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  46. B. S. Panjaitan, “Restorative Justice Sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Berbasis Korban,” Doktrina, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 159, 2022.
  47. L. J. Leonard, “Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts?,” Laws, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/laws11010014.
  48. V. S. Ariani Hasanah Soejoeti, “Diskusi Keadilan Restoratif dalam Konteks Kekerasan Seksual di Kampus,” Deviance, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 2020.
  49. A. Mardatillah, “Jaksa Agung Sampaikan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dengan Hati Nurani.” hukumonline.com.