Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Environmental Law

Liability of Mining Companies Related to Environmental Pollution in the Perspective of Prophetic Law
Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan Tambang Terkait Pencemaran Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Hukum Profetik

View Article
Similarity Report
  • St. Muslimah Suciati*,
  • Asri Sarif,
  • Rasmuddin,
  • Arfa Arfa
St. Muslimah Suciati
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia *
Asri Sarif
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia
Rasmuddin
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia
Arfa Arfa
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.955


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 7, 2022
Keywords
  • Prophetic Law,
  • Environmental Pollution,
  • Corporate Responsibility
How to Cite
Suciati, S. M., Sarif, A., Rasmuddin, & Arfa, A. (2022). Liability of Mining Companies Related to Environmental Pollution in the Perspective of Prophetic Law. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.955. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.955

Copyright (c) 2022 St. Muslimah Suciati, Asri Sarif, Rasmuddin, Arfa Arfa (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study aims to analyze aspects of mining company liability related to environmental pollution in the perspective of prophetic law. A review of prophetic law is used as an analytical knife to confirm the existence of prophetic law, one of which emphasizes "unity" between the interests of humans and the universe (including the environment). This research is a normative legal research by prioritizing the concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that proper legal responsibility for mining companies if it is proven that there is environmental pollution in a preventive manner or prevention, mining companies need to anticipate that before mining companies carry out mining activities, they must submit a post-mining reclamation plan and provide a post-mining reclamation guarantee fund. Then in the implementation of mining activities supervision must be carried out continuously and negotiate/persuade or supervise so that mining companies carry out their mining activities in compliance with permit conditions and other conditions for carrying out environmentally sound mining activities. Viewed from the perspective of prophetic law, legal accountability for mining companies in relation to environmental pollution is actually in accordance with three aspects of prophetic law, namely aspects of transcendence, humanization, and liberation. Therefore, in order to make law enforcement effective regarding legal liability for mining companies in relation to environmental pollution, it is necessary to harmonize and synchronize laws and regulations as well as the need for efforts to maintain coherence between statutory regulations and practice in the field.

View Article
Similarity Report

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. N. L. Pohwain, J. J. Pietersz, and R. V. Rugebregt, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Yang Lingkungan Hidupnya Tercemar,” TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 508–516, 2021.
  2. D. E. P. Adam Ilyas, “Problematika Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya,” Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 807, 2022.
  3. Ibrahim, Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa di Kawasan Tambang, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: LeutikaPrio, 2018.
  4. A. Suherman, “Esensi Asas Legalitas dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan,” Bina Huk. Lingkung., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 135, 2020.
  5. P. Haryadi, Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Melalui Gugatan Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.
  6. CNBC Indonesia, “Dirjen Minerba: Negara Rugi Triliunan dari Tambang Ilegal.” www.cnbcindonesia.com, p. 1, 2022.
  7. D. Wahyuhono, S. Purwono, and D. Mutiarin, “Kontrol Pemuda Terhadap Tata Kelola Migas Dan Implikasinya Pada Ketahanan Wilayah Di Kawasan Migas Blok Cepu Kabupaten Bojonegoro,” J. Ketahanan Nas., vol. 25, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: 10.22146/jkn.38265.
  8. N. & R. S. & Y. A. & R. J. Arsjah, “Sustainability Performance and Sustainable Development Goals,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Policy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
  9. K. D. Cahya, “Teksas Wonocolo di Bojonegoro, Wisata Migas ala Texas AS.” Kompas, Jakarta, 2020.
  10. L. S. Chrisdon Zakaria Purba, Hisar Siregar, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Usaha Yang Melakukan Usaha Penambangan Tanpa IUP, IPR Atau IUPK (Studi Putusan Nomor 556/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn Bls,” PATIK J. Huk., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 40, 2021.
  11. M. B. Hesti Lestari, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Berkaitan Dengan Dumping Limbah Tanpa Izin Pada Perusahaan Tambang PT. Indominco Mandiri Di Kalimantan,” ONSTITUTUM J. Ilm. Huk., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 48, 2022.
  12. F. A. P. Popi Amaria Simatupang, Pricilia Fanesha Pinangkaan, “Upaya Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan Dalam Mengatasi Praktik Pertambangan Batubara Ilegal,” Lex Suprema, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1051, 2022.
  13. P. Langbroek, K. van den Bos, M. S. Thomas, M. Milo, and W. van Rossum, “Methodology of legal research: Challenges and opportunities,” Utr. Law Rev., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: 10.18352/ulr.411.
  14. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  15. M. B. Salinding, “Prinsip Hukum Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara yang Berpihak kepada Masyarakat Hukum Adat,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 148, 2019, doi: 10.31078/jk1618.
  16. Mayer Hayrani DS, “Pengaturan Pengawasan Pusat Terhadap Izin Usaha Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Di Era Otonomi Daerah,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 133, 2018.
  17. G. N. Nathanael, “Industri Batubara Dari Sisi Ekonomi, Politik, Dan Lingkungan,” Parapolitika J. Polit. Democr. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 2021, 2021.
  18. Y. Z. Frendly Albertus, “Dampak Dan Pengaruh Pertambangan Batubara Terhadap Masyarakat Dan Lingkungan Di Kalimantan Timur,” LEGALITAS, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 44, 2019.
  19. A. A. Amrurobbi, “Problematika Sampah Visual Media Luar Ruang: Tinjauan Regulasi Kampanye Pemilu dan Pilkada,” J. Adhyasta Pemilu, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 66–78, 2021, doi: 10.55108/jap.v4i2.50.
  20. and L. H. Hadrian, Endang, Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia: Permasalahan Eksekusi Dan Mediasi, 1st ed. Sleman: Deepublish, 2020.
  21. T. Z. Kamilovska, “Effective Remedy For Excessive Length Of Proceedings: A Macedonian Perspective,” Access to Justice East. Eur., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62–63, 2021.
  22. S. S. Rangkuti, Hukum lingkungan dan kebijaksanaan lingkungan nasional. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2015.
  23. P. P. Pradiatmika, I. A. P. Widiati, and N. M. S. Karma, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat di Daerah Pertambangan,” J. Analog. Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 252–257, 2020, doi: 10.22225/ah.2.2.1929.252-257.
  24. Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Peradaban, 2007.
  25. H. A. Santoso, “Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan Pkpu ‘PTB,’” Jatiswara, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 329, 2021.
  26. Nuradi, D. A. Budisetyowati, E. Rohaedi, and T. Setiadi, “Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Berlakunya Uu Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja,” Pakuan Law Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 154–169, 2022, doi: 10.33751/palar.v8i1.4689.
  27. A. G. Mahardika, “Implikasi Penghapusan Strict Liability Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Di Era Sustainable Development Goals,” Leg. J. Huk. dan Perundang-undangan, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 59, 2022.
  28. H. Dancer, “Harmony with Nature: towards a new deep legal pluralism,” J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.1080/07329113.2020.1845503.
  29. H. Effendi, M. Mursalin, and R. Sonaji, “Dinamika persetujuan lingkungan dalam perspektif Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 22 tahun 2021 dan peraturan turunannya,” J. Pengelolaan Lingkung. Berkelanjutan (Journal Environ. Sustain. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 759–787, 2022, doi: 10.36813/jplb.5.3.759-787.
  30. G. P. Larasati, “Penerapan Prinsip Pencemar Membayar Terhadap Pencemaran Limbah Bahan Berbahaya Dan Beracun (B3),” Pacta Sunt Servanda, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 183–193, 2022.
  31. L. A. N. Kusuma, “Environmental Disputes Without Protection Of Strict Liability Principles : Again , Law On Job Creation,” Law Justice, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.23917/laj.v7i1.699.
  32. I. Harahap, R. Pratiwi, and Y. Yalid, “Perbandingan Mekanisme Gugatan Kelompok Masyarakat Dan Gugatan Oleh Organisasi Lingkungan Hidup,” J. Karya Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2022.
  33. KBBI, “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online.” KBBI, 2022.
  34. Viswandoro, Kamus Istilah Hukum: Sumber Rujukan Peristilahan Hukum, Cetakan ke. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Medpress Digital, 2014.
  35. F. P. Disantara, “TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19,” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 48–60, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.33760/jch.v6i1.262.
  36. M. A. S. Jimly Asshidiqie, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, 1st ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2012.
  37. F. A. Samekto, “Menelusuri Akar Pemikiran Hans Kelsen Tentang Stufenbeautheorie Dalam Pendekatan Normatif-Filosofis,” J. Huk. Progresif, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: 10.14710/hp.7.1.1-19.
  38. Markus Y Hage and P. K. Ningrum, “Corrective Justice And Its Significance On The Private Law,” JILS J. Indones. Leg. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 339–390, 2022.
  39. P. N. H. Simanjuntak, Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Cetajkan k. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.
  40. I. Sari, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) dalam Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Perdata,” J. Ilm. Huk. Dirgant., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v11i1.651.
  41. F. N. R. Muhammad Addi Fauzani, “Problematik Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Penguasa Di Peradilan Administrasi Indonesia (Studi Kritis Terhadap Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019),” Widya Pranata Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 23, 2020.
  42. A. Y. Hernoko, Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial, 4th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
  43. N. Astriani, “Pengaturan Air dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia,” Bina Huk. Lingkung., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 374, 2021.
  44. Y. K. Artanto, “Bapongka, Sistem Budaya Suku Bajo dalam Menjaga Kelestarian Sumber Daya Pesisir,” Sabda, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 52–69, 2017.
  45. A. Suntoro, “Implementasi Pencapaian Secara Progresif dalam Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja,” J. HAM, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.30641/ham.2021.12.1-18.
  46. S. Bustani, “Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Mengantisipasi Dampak Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup Akibat Perkembangan Bioteknologi Pertanian,” Huk. Pidana dan Pembang. Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 10, 2020.
  47. M. I. Farma Rahayu, A. F. Susanto, and L. Sukma Muliya, “Gerakan Sosial Pemberdayaan Hukum Dalam Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Melalui Metode Patanjala,” Bina Huk. Lingkung., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2017, doi: 10.24970/jbhl.v2n1.5.
  48. A. H. Rachman, “Ketidakpastian Status Lahan dan Potensi Deforestasi Dalam Wacana Pembangunan Bandar Antariksa Biak,” Jentera J. Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 394, 2021.
  49. E. all. Absori, Paradigma Hukum Profetik: Ragam Paradigma Menuju Hukum Berketuhanan, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: CV Genta Fisa Utama, 2018.
  50. S. Mutholingah, “Tasawuf ‘Irfani Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam,” PIWULANG, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 35, 2020, doi: 10.32478/piwulang.v3i1.503.
  51. A. Farhani and I. S. Chandranegara, “Penguasaan Negara terhadap Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam Ruang Angkasa Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 235, 2019, doi: 10.31078/jk1622.
  52. R. Anisa, S. Z. Soraya, and D. U. Nurdahlia, “Konsep Ilmu Sosial Profetik Kuntowijoyo Terhadap Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam,” Kuttab, vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 93–99, 2021.
  53. A. B. Khudzaifah Dimyati, Haedar Nashir, Elviandri, Absori, Kelik Wardiono, “Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1–8, 2021.
  54. M. Syamsuddin, Ed., Ilmu Hukum Profetik: Gagasan Awal, Landasan Kefilsafatan, dan Kemungkinan Penerapannya di Era Postmodern, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2013.
  55. S. L. Brock, The Light that Binds: A Study in Thomas Aquinas’s Metaphysics of Natural Law. Eugene: Pickwick Publications, 2020.