Rechtsidee
Vol 11 No 1 (2023): June
Business Law

Trust and Accountability: Legal Implications of Train Delays
Kepercayaan dan Akuntabilitas: Implikasi Hukum dari Keterlambatan Kereta Api

View Article
  • Erifendi Churniawan*
Erifendi Churniawan
Politeknik Perkeretaapian Indonesia Madiun, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i0.970


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 21, 2023
Keywords
  • Train delays,
  • legal responsibility,
  • ethical accountability,
  • progressive perspective,
  • public trust
How to Cite
Churniawan, E. (2023). Trust and Accountability: Legal Implications of Train Delays. Rechtsidee, 11(1), 10.21070/jihr.v12i0.970. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i0.970

Copyright (c) 2023 Erifendi Churniawan (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches aims to analyze the implications of train delays according to schedule in a progressive legal perspective and to construct ethical and legal responsibility for such delays. The results reveal that train delays not only harm passengers but also decrease public trust in rail services. In a progressive legal perspective, trust is the fundamental element for law to serve human interests. To address this issue, a minister of transportation regulation should be established to hold train service managers accountable for delays and provide ethical and legal obligations to passengers. By learning from the accountability of aircraft delays, such regulations can be adapted to rail transportation.

 

Highlights:

  1. Train delays have negative consequences for passengers and public trust in rail services.
  2. Trust is a fundamental element for law to serve human interests.
  3. A minister of transportation regulation should be established to hold train service managers accountable for delays and provide ethical and legal obligations to passengers.

 

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. R. Hadiningtyas, “the Legal Protection for Transport Passengers During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” J. Pembaharuan Huk., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 232, 2021, doi: 10.26532/jph.v8i2.15374.
  2. M. Amin and Jufrin, “Peranan Pengangkutan Laut Sebagai Sarana Transportasi Masyarakat Indonesia,” Fundam. J. Ilm. Huk., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 191–207, 2020, doi: 10.34304/fundamental.v9i2.26.
  3. R. I. Saputri, B. T. Iswanto, H. Heniyatun, and N. Nurwati, “Tanggungjawab pengangkut terhadap hilangnya barang kiriman (studi kasus ekspedisi dharma raya Muntilan),” Borobudur Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2021, doi: 10.31603/burrev.4735.
  4. S. Noer, N. Saleh, Dan, and R. Diani, “Hukum Perjanjian Pengangkutan Darat Antara Pt Bgr Dengan Pt Pusri Palembang,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 1, no. September, pp. 1–11, 2021.
  5. I. W. W. Sancaya and I. M. A. M. Putra, “Tanggungjawab Perusahaan Angkutan Terhadap Kerugian yang Ditimbulkan Akibat Kelalaian Pengemudi Selama Kegiatan Penyelenggaraan Pengangkutan,” Kertha Wicaksana, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–43, 2021, doi: 10.22225/kw.15.1.2822.47-43.
  6. Mey Anjani, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Desak Gde Dwi Arini, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Cargo atas Keterlambatan terhadap Pengangkutan Muatan Melalui Kapal Laut (Studi Kasus Di Pt. Bali Intercont Cargo),” J. Interpret. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 113–117, 2022, doi: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4722.113-117.
  7. Kementerian Perhubungan, “Hingga 30 Desember 2022, Kemenhub Catat 8,3 Juta Lebih Orang Bepergian dengan Angkutan Umum.” dephub.go.id, p. 1, 2022.
  8. N. Naurah, “Survei Goodstats: Kereta Api Jadi Transportasi Massal Paling Banyak Digemari Untuk Liburan.” goodstats.id, p. 1, 2022.
  9. H. W. Puruhita, S. M. Lestari, T. M. Agustriana, A. Aghastya, and S. Triwijaya, “Pengenalan Keselamatan Perkeretaapian sejak Dini (Lokasi: SD Negeri Tebon 1 Magetan),” Madiun Spoor (JPM), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–60, 2021, doi: 10.37367/jpm.v1i1.145.
  10. A. M. H. Putri, “Bye Pandemi! Jumlah Penumpang Kereta Meroket 86%.” www.cnbcindonesia.com, p. 1, 2023.
  11. P. Ricardianto et al., “Covid-19: Implikasi Transportasi Darat dan Logistik di Indonesia,” J. Manaj. Transp. Logistik, vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 155–170, 2021.
  12. A. Ya, Murzala, and R. Nurliyantika, “Legal certainty of cabotage principle regarding sea transportation in Indonesia,” Sriwij. Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 2021, doi: 10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss1.603.pp71-85.
  13. S. S. Arief Rachmad Hidayat, Hufron, “Tanggung Jawab Pt. Kereta Api (Persero) Terhadap Penumpang Yang Menjadi Korban Kecelakaan Kereta Api,” J. Akrab Juara, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–25, 2020.
  14. Sukama, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pengawasan Pt. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) Atas Penumpang Dan Barang Dihubungkan Dengan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Ri Nomor 23 Tahun 2007 Tentang Kereta Api,” Focus (Madison)., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
  15. M. H. P. Hisni Insiyah, “Aspek Hukum Perlintasan Kereta Api Ilegal Di Wilayah Warungbambu Karawang,” Meta-Yuridis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20–35, 2022.
  16. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  17. R. H. B. Putra, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penumpang Kereta Api Dalam Peristiwa Kecelakaan Kereta Api Di Indonesia,” Al Qodiri J. Pendidikan, Sos. dan Keagamaan, vol. 19, no. 85, pp. 1–23, 2021.
  18. E. R. Chan, E. H. Jeremy, and T. Sinulingga, “Efektifitas Penggunaan Rantai Pengaman pada Rangkaian Kereta,” J. Penelit. Sekol. Tinggi Transp. Darat, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 49–57, 2020, doi: 10.55511/jpsttd.v11i2.554.
  19. Pusat Data dan Analisa TEMPO, Profil dan Perjalanan Ignasius Jonan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Tempo, 2019.
  20. Rusmiyah, “Upaya Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Pengguna Jasa Angkutan Kereta Api Di Indonesia,” J. Legisia, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 152–164, 2022.
  21. W. A. Fernando Sakti Toding Rompas, Karel Y. Umboh, “Tanggung Jawab Penyelenggara Prasarana Perkretaapian Atas Kerugian Sebagai Akibat Kecelakaan,” Lex Priv., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 5–15, 2021.
  22. Y. N. T. Androvaga Renandra Tetama, Suharno, “Pembangunan Kereta Cepat Jakarta-Bandung: Memaknai Konsultasi Publik Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pengadaan Tanah,” Widya Bhumi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136–151, 2022.
  23. E. Teguh Rama Prasja Anggraini Dwi MilandryKurniasih, “Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Hal Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Pengusaha Travel Tanpa Izin Operasional,” J. Anal. Huk., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 231–244, 2022, doi: 10.38043/jah.v5i2.3741.
  24. W. F. Nedi Pernando, Busyra Azheri, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Kerusakan Barang Pengguna Jasa Pengiriman Angkutan Online,” Soumatera Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 6, 2021.
  25. A. Z. Deni, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pengguna Ojek Online Pada Saat Pandemi,” Commer. Law, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 360, 2021.
  26. R. D. Haloho, J. Sidauruk, and U. Utomo, “Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Jasa Angkutan terhadap Barang Niaga Melalui Darat,” PATIK J. Huk., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 178–191, 2018.
  27. D. P. Gusti, B. Supriyono, H. Wardhono, M. Rozikin, and B. S. Riyadi, “Public policy: Inconsistency of online and conventional land transportation regulations in Indonesia on social conflict implications,” Int. J. Criminol. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 729–744, 2021, doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.87.
  28. Y. Truntsevsky, V. Lez’er, S. Belyasov, and A. Kopytova, “Legal aspects in development of transport infrastructure in the city of Tyumen,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 157, pp. 0–7, 2020, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202015703016.
  29. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.
  30. C. I. P. Fradhana Putra Disantara, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo, Mohamad Jazuli, Ni Putu Ratnayutika, Rini Triastutiek Umiasih, “The Enigma of Ethics: Code of Ethics Enforcement on Covid-19 Health Protocol,” Lega Lata, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3, 2021.
  31. A. I. Dicky Eko Prasetio, “Judicial Activism dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Ratifikasi,” NEGARA Huk., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 258, 2022.
  32. Desak Nyoman Oxsi Selina and I. M. W. Darma, “Legal Protection for Online Transportation Service Providers in Transporting Passengers,” J. Huk. Prasada, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 70–77, 2021, doi: 10.22225/jhp.8.2.2021.70-77.
  33. E. Fahamsyah and F. P. Disantara, “The Dignified Justice Perspective on the Enigma of Health Protocols COVID-19 as a Code of Ethics,” J. Pembaharuan Huk., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.17413.
  34. G. H. Shill, “The future of law and transportation,” Iowa Law Rev., vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 2107–2124, 2021.
  35. T. Prasetyo and T. A. Handayani, “Theory of Dignified Justice as A Legal Foundation of Law Reform in Indonesia,” Surakarta Law Soc. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2018.
  36. S. Koos, “Digital globalization and law,” Lex Sci. Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–68, 2022, doi: 10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.55092.
  37. M. S. Purba and F. R. Sinaga, “the Legal Liability of Online Driver for Passengers Accident in Consumer Protection Law,” Int. J. Law Reconstr., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 341, 2021, doi: 10.26532/ijlr.v5i2.17945.
  38. F. Lauwtania, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Jasa Perkeretaapian Terkait Dengan Pelecehan Seksual yang Terjadi di Atas Kereta Api Dikaji Oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Kasus PT. Kereta Api Indonesia),” Binamulia Huk., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–78, 2021, doi: 10.37893/jbh.v10i1.242.
  39. W. Andriawan, “Pancasila Perspective on the Development of Legal Philosophy: Relation of Justice and Progressive Law,” Volksgeist J. Ilmu Huk. dan Konstitusi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.24090/volksgeist.v5i1.6361.
  40. Y. Neta, Budiyono, and A. A. Firmansyah, “The Model of Local Regulation of the Human Rights Fulfillment Based on Progressive Law,” JALREV, vol. 3, no. Special Issue, pp. 18–34, 2021.
  41. M. Vatter, “Dignity and the Foundation of Human Rights: Toward an Averroist Genealogy,” Polit. Relig., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 304–332, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S1755048319000336.
  42. Dicky Eko Prasetio Adam Ilyas Felix Ferdin Bakker, “Membangun Moralitas dan Hukum Sebagai Integrative Mechanism di Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif,” Mimb. Keadilan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 128–138, 2021.
  43. Y. D. Herlindah, “Development Legal Theory and Progressive Legal Theory : A Review , in Indonesia ’ s Contemporary Legal Reform,” Perad. J. Law Soc., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 18, 2022.
  44. T. A. S. Negara, “Normative Legal Research In Indonesia: Its Origins And Approaches,” ACLJ, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5, 2023.
  45. I. W. W. Febrina Rizka Lilya Wati David, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penumpang Sebagai Pengguna Jasa Angkutan Udara Atas Keterlambatan Penerbangan,” Kertha Semaya, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 258, 2020.
  46. D. Bagus Hari Mahardika, “Perlindungan Konsumen Terkait Dengan Jadwal Penerbangan Tidak Efektif Pt. Citilink Jog Adisutjipto,” Flight Attend. Kedirgant. J. Public Relation, Pelayanan, Pariwisata, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–81, 2022, doi: 10.56521/attendant-dirgantara.v4i1.539.
  47. S. Hanisa, S. Suparto, and T. Handayani, “Tangggung Jawab Maskapai Penerbangan Terhadap Penumpang Terkait Kebijakan Covid-19 Yang Tercantum Dalam Permenhub 25 Tahun 2020,” J. Sains Sosio Hum., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 442–453, 2021, doi: 10.22437/jssh.v5i1.14156.