Rechtsidee
Vol 11 No 2 (2023): December
Criminal Law

Sniffing Cybercrimes in M-Banking via WhatsApp: Comparative Legal Framework and Implications
Sniffing Cybercrime di M-Banking via WhatsApp: Kerangka Hukum Komparatif dan Implikasinya

View Article
  • Tsania Aziziyah*,
  • Didik Endro Purwoleksono,
  • Taufik Rachman
Tsania Aziziyah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia *
Didik Endro Purwoleksono
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Taufik Rachman
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.985


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 2, 2023
Keywords
  • M-Banking,
  • Sniffing Cybercrimes,
  • WhatsApp,
  • Legal Framework,
  • Bank Accountability
How to Cite
Aziziyah, T., Purwoleksono, D. E., & Rachman, T. (2023). Sniffing Cybercrimes in M-Banking via WhatsApp: Comparative Legal Framework and Implications. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.985. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.985

Copyright (c) 2023 Tsania Aziziyah, Didik Endro Purwoleksono, Taufik Rachman (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This normative legal research investigates the regulatory landscape and legal responsibilities surrounding sniffing cybercrimes in mobile banking (M-Banking) operations via the WhatsApp application. The study uniquely aligns its analysis with established laws like the Information and Electronic Transaction Law (UU ITE) and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), elucidating the nuances in sanctions stipulated by these respective legislations. It reveals that the UU ITE and its amendments carry more severe sanctions than the UU PDP. However, based on the lex specialis derogate legi generalis principle and teleological/sociological interpretations of the law's purpose, it concludes that Article 67 (1) of UU PDP governs such sniffing offenses in M-Banking via WhatsApp. The implicated legal liability includes a maximum prison sentence of five years and/or a fine up to five hundred billion rupiah. Moreover, the research underscores the accountability of banking institutions to compensate for the losses suffered by victims, encompassing the replacement of the full or partial account balance or other agreed forms of responsibility. These findings have critical implications for cybersecurity regulations, and the banking sector's duty of care towards customers in the digital era.
Highlights:

  • Disparity: Penalties under UU ITE and UU PDP differ for sniffing cybercrimes.
  • Governing Law: Sniffing crimes in M-Banking via WhatsApp fall under UU PDP, Article 67 (1).
  • Liability: Banks are responsible for compensating victims' losses.

Keywords: Sniffing Cybercrimes, M-Banking, WhatsApp, Legal Framework, Bank Accountability.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. G. Greco and N. Montinaro, “the Phenomenon of Cybercrime: From the Transnational Connotation To the Need for Globalization of Justice,” Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.46827/ejsss.v6i1.956.
  2. Y. V. Kotukh, D. V. Kislov, T. S. Yarovoi, R. O. Kotsiuba, and O. H. Bondarenko, “Cybercrime and subculture of cybercriminals,” Linguist. Cult. Rev., vol. 5, no. S4, pp. 858–869, 2021, doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v5ns4.1769.
  3. I. K. Odie, K. Putra, I. M. A. Darmawan, and I. P. G. Juliana, “Crime Actions In The Digital World In The Form Of Phising,” CyberSecurity Digit. Forensics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 77–82, 2022.
  4. I. V. Ershova and D. R. Feyzrakhmanova, “Medical Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Legal Aspects and Future Prospects) Vasiliy,” Laws, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 6, 2022.
  5. F. S. Defi Sri Sunardi Ramadhani, Setiawan Noerdajasakti, “Kedudukan Surat Keputusan Bersama sebagai Pedoman Implementasi Pasal Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam UU ITE,” Ilm. Pendidik. Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 380, 2022.
  6. T. Andriyanto, “Komunikasi Termediasi Penipuan dengan Modus Business Email Compromise,” J. Ris. Komun., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 220–243, 2022, doi: 10.38194/jurkom.v5i2.627.
  7. M. E. Amin Muftiadi, Tri Putri Mulyani Agustina, “Studi kasus keamanan jaringan komputer: analisis ancaman phisingterhadap layanan online banking,” Hexatech J. Ilm. Tek., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2022.
  8. M. I. Zulfa, S. Tena, and S. D. Rizkiono, “Aktivitas Sniffing Pada Malware Pencuri Uang Di Smartphone Android,” Renata, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2023.
  9. I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
  10. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitiam Hukum, 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  11. G. T. Siregar and S. Sinaga, “the Law Globalization in Cybercrime Prevention,” Int. J. Law Reconstr., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 211, 2021, doi: 10.26532/ijlr.v5i2.17514.
  12. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.
  13. C. Z. Mahrina, Joko Sasmito, “The Electronic and Transactions Law (EIT Law) as the First Cyber crime Law in Indonesia: An Introduction and Its Implementation,” Pena Justisia, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 345–362, 2022.
  14. M. A. F. Syahril and Faculty, “Cyber Crime in Terms of the Human Rights Perspective,” Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 72–80, 2023.
  15. N. Almrezeq, F. Alserhani, and M. Humayun, “Exploratory Study to Measure Awareness of Cybercrime in Saudi Arabia,” Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2992–2999, 2021.
  16. E. Budi, D. Wira, and A. Infantono, “Strategi Penguatan Cyber Security Guna Mewujudkan Keamanan Nasional di Era Society 5.0,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Teknologi dan Inovasi Indonesia (SENASTINDO), 2021, vol. 3, no. November, pp. 223–234, doi: 10.54706/senastindo.v3.2021.141.
  17. G. S. Saleh and G. S. Saleh, “Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Online Store Fraud in Indonesia,” J. Huk. dan Peradil., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 151, 2022, doi: 10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.151-175.
  18. M. Mohd Ali and N. Farhana Mohd Zaharon, “Phishing as Cyber Fraud: The Implications and Governance,” Hong Kong J. Soc. Sci., vol. 57, no. 1, p. 123, 2021.
  19. A. S. Gulo, S. Lasmadi, and K. Nawawi, “Cyber Crime dalam Bentuk Phising Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik,” Pampas J. Crim. Law J. Crim. Law J. Crim. Law, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–81, 2021, doi: 10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9574.
  20. T. Nguyen and H. T. Luong, “The structure of cybercrime networks: transnational computer fraud in Vietnam,” J. Crime Justice, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 419–440, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2020.1818605.
  21. Aryono and J. Barkhuizen, “Criminal law enforcement of Phising attacks on online banking services,” in International Conference Health, Science And Technology (ICOHETECH), 2021, pp. 360–363.
  22. D. Y. Perwej, S. Qamar Abbas, J. Pratap Dixit, D. N. Akhtar, and A. Kumar Jaiswal, “A Systematic Literature Review on the Cyber Security,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 669–710, 2021, doi: 10.18535/ijsrm/v9i12.ec04.
  23. A. Anggono and M. Riskiyadi, “Cybercrime dan Cybersecurity pada Fintech: Sebuah Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis Cybercrime and Cybersecurity at Fintech: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. Manaj. dan Organ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 239–251, 2021.
  24. S. Kemp, D. Buil-Gil, A. Moneva, F. Miró-Llinares, and N. Díaz-Castaño, “Empty Streets, Busy Internet: A Time-Series Analysis of Cybercrime and Fraud Trends During COVID-19,” J. Contemp. Crim. Justice, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 480–501, 2021, doi: 10.1177/10439862211027986.
  25. M. I. P. Adhi and E. Soponyono, “Crime Combating Policy of Carding in Indonesia in the Political Perspective of Criminal Law,” Law Reform, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2021.
  26. R. Rosita, “Pengaruh Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Umkm Di Indonesia,” J. Lentera Bisnis, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 109, 2020, doi: 10.34127/jrlab.v9i2.380.
  27. J. Mathias and R. Blessica, “Hate Speech and the Freedom Discourse,” Indones. Media Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.15294/imrev.v1i1.56673.
  28. P. Angriani, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Data Pribadi dalam Transaksi E-Commerce: Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif,” DIKTUM J. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 149–165, 2021.
  29. M. S. Putri, “Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Bagi Pelanggan Jasa Telekomunikasi Terkait Kewajiban Registrasi Kartu SIM,” J. Cakrawala Huk., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2018, doi: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2772.
  30. N. Irfani, “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 305, 2020, doi: 10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.
  31. D. E. Purwoleksono, Hukum Pidana, 1st ed. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2016.
  32. D. Wijaya, “Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Yang Melakukan Kegiatan Pertambangan Diluar Titik Koordinat Ijin Operasi Produksi,” Huk. Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 642, 2019.
  33. F. P. Alviolita, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Oleh Pengurus Korporasi Dikaitkan dengan Asas Geen Straf Zonder Schuld,” Refleks. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018.
  34. E. O. S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2020.
  35. D. Sumarna, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengemudi Kendaraan Umum Yang Mengakibatkan Meninggalnya Penumpang Ditinjau Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 299 K/Pid/2018),” Al Hikmah, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 708, 2021.