Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): June
Business Law

Cartel Practices in Indonesian Tyre Industry: Assessing the Role of the Indonesian Tyre Business Association: Praktek Kartel Pada Industri Ban Indonesia: Meninjau Peran Asosiasi Perusahaan Ban Indonesia

Indra Susanto
Universitas Esa Unggul
Markoni Markoni
Universitas Esa Unggul
Categories

Published 2023-06-28

Keywords

  • Cartel,
  • Indonesian Tyre Entrepreneurs Association (APBI),
  • Unfair Business Competition,
  • Competition Law,
  • Indonesian Tyre Industry

How to Cite

Susanto, I., & Markoni, M. (2023). Cartel Practices in Indonesian Tyre Industry: Assessing the Role of the Indonesian Tyre Business Association: Praktek Kartel Pada Industri Ban Indonesia: Meninjau Peran Asosiasi Perusahaan Ban Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 11(1), 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.991. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i1.991

Abstract

This study examines the legal standing of the Indonesian Tyre Business Association (APBI) in light of the KPPU Decision Number 08/Pdt.G/KPPU-I-2014 concerning tire cartel violations in the Indonesian automotive industry. Utilizing normative legal research methods focusing on positive legal norms, the study identifies and systematizes violations of business competition rules by six major APBI member companies between 2008 and 2012, and critically analyzes and interprets the evidentiary basis of these findings. The companies allegedly colluded on tire pricing, manipulating the market for Passenger Car Radial (PCR) tires and inducing unfair business competition. The study asserts that, while the APBI's role in facilitating this collusion was apparent, its legal liability remains unclear due to the association's ability to influence member practices without a binding enforcement mechanism. These findings raise critical implications for market competition and cartel law enforcement, necessitating a re-evaluation of the legal provisions surrounding business associations, especially in the context of Indonesia's anti-monopoly and unfair competition laws.
Highlights:

  • APBI's facilitation of cartel behavior among its members.
  • Unclear legal liability of business associations in anti-competitive practices.
  • Need for re-evaluation of legal provisions surrounding business associations.

Keywords: Cartel, Indonesian Tyre Business Association (APBI), Unfair Business Competition, Competition Law, Indonesian Tyre Industry

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. I. Ismail and H. Ii, "Implementation of Islamic Business Ethics as a Competitive Strategy at PT Mahesa Energi Persada Jakarta," in Judicious, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 183-198, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37010/jdc.v2i2.484
  2. A. Suherman, Manajemen Strategi. Drestanta Pelita Indonesia Press, 2022.
  3. S. J. Simanjuntak and M. Gultom, "Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Mengawasi Tender Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) di Sumatera Utara," in Tapanuli Journals, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 188-204, 2022.
  4. R. Bukido and L. F. Bamatraf, "Peranan Komisi Pengawas Persaiangan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Menegakan UndangUndang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat," in Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah, vol. 15, no. 1, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v15i1.474
  5. A. Chandra and Y. S. M. Widiyastuti, "Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Mendorong Iklim Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat Di Sektor Perunggasan," in Justitia et Pax, vol. 33, no. 1, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v33i1.1416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v33i1.1416
  6. M. Fadhilah, "Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Kerangka Ekstrateritorial," in Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.217
  7. J. G. Sitanggang, "Legal Protection of Business Competition Against Indications of Cartel Association of Tire Companies in Indonesia (Analysis of the Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 08/KPPU-I/2014 on Four-Wheeled Motor Vehicle Tire Cartels)," Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, April 2015. Available: http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1060.
  8. A. S. Ningsih, "Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM)," in Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol. 19, no. 2, Art. 2, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.207-215
  9. B. E. Kalangi, "Prosedur Penanganan Perkara Monopoli Dan Persaingan Curang Serta Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999," in LEX CRIMEN, vol. 6, no. 1, Art. 1, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15099
  10. I. Sugiarto, "Perspektif Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terhadap Diskriminasi Harga," in Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, vol. 33, no. 2, Art. 2, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v33i2.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v33i2.101
  11. S. A. Darmawan, "Kekuatan Indirect Evidence Dalam Pembuktian Kasus Persekongkolan Tender dan Penerapannya di Dalam Proses Tender," in Jurnal Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10-18, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55961/jpbj.v1i1.7
  12. R. A. Pratama, "Pengaturan Monopoli Kartel Oleh Pelaku Usaha Dalam Persaingan Usaha Garam: Suatu Kajian Putusan Kppu No. 10/Kppu-L/2005," in Jurnal Ius Constituendum, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 212, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v3i2.1041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v3i2.1041
  13. M. Muskibah, "Larangan Persekongkolan dalam Tender Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat," in Inovatif | Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/taradhi.v5i1.75