Vol 7 (2020): December
Administrative Law

Plagiarism in Higher Education Power Relations and Legal Aspects

Fradhana Putra Disantara
Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Published March 9, 2021
  • Power Relation,
  • Plagiarism,
  • Higher Education
How to Cite
Disantara, F. P. (2021). Plagiarism in Higher Education Power Relations and Legal Aspects. Rechtsidee, 7. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2020.7.714


Academic expression of a person is often manifested in various scientific works as a form of efforts to help ‘educate the nation's life’. However, this scientific work becomes the object of intellectual crime, namely plagiarism. In fact, these intellectual crimes occur in tertiary institutions by utilizing the power relation aspects of certain academic positions. This research is a legal research; which aims to describe power relations as the cause of plagiarism in higher education, and is associated with professionalism and academic ethics; then describe the legal aspects that can be imposed on plagiarism for plagiarism in the realm of Higher Education. In this legal research, primary and secondary legal materials are used to inventory in order to obtain a prescription study on the legal issues discussed. The results of the study state that power relations are the main cause of plagiarism in Higher Education; considering that power relations lead to the structure of academic positions; so that it has the potential to make individuals under the control and dependence of parties who have greater authority. Then, the legal aspects of plagiarism in Higher Education can give birth to legal consequences; in the form of criminal sanctions, civil sanctions, and administrative sanctions. Therefore, the researcher recommends revising the Ministerial Regulation regarding plagiarism in Higher Education; and revising copyright laws and regulations by including several norms regarding plagiarism.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


  1. Z. Naqvi, “Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Copyright Infringement,” Marq. Intellectual. Prop. L. Rev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 16–50, 2020.
  2. A. Szerletics and L. Rodak, “Introduction: Legal Education in Europe. Challenges and Prospects,” Oñati Socio-Legal Ser., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1581–1588, 2017.
  3. G. Davies, “The Relationship between Empirical Legal Studies and Doctrinal Legal Research,” Erasmus Law Rev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 3–12, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.5553/ELR.000141.
  4. J. Hendry, N. Creutzfeldt, and C. Boulanger, “Socio-Legal Studies in Germany and the UK: Theory and Methods,” Ger. Law J., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1309–1317, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1017/glj.2020.83.
  5. C. Boulanger, “The Comparative Sociology of Legal Doctrine: Thoughts on a Research Program,” Ger. Law J., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1362–1377, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1017/glj.2020.80.
  6. S. Taekema, “Methodologies of Rule of Law Research: Why Legal Philosophy Needs Empirical and Doctrinal Scholarship,” Law Philos., May 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10982-020-09388-1.
  7. A. Rukajat, Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif (Qualitative Research Approach). Yogyakarta: Deeppublish, 2018.
  8. E. A. Apolski, A. Y. Mordovtsev, and A. Y. Mamychev, “Doctrinal basis of the Soviet law science —epistemological and praxeological dimensions,” Russ. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 45–53, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.17816/RJLS52837.
  9. S.-Y. Shin, “Plagiarism,” J. Periodontal Implant Sci., vol. 49, no. 2, p. 59, 2019, doi: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.59.
  10. B. Hermono, “Potensi Plagiarisme di Perguruan Tinggi,” in Potensi Plagiarisme di Pendidikan Tinggi, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUxDdZuq1j0&t=3176s.
  11. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi, 13th ed. Jakarta: KENCANA, 2017.
  12. A. Adewopo, “Intellectual property protection for software : global perspective and lessons for development and reform in Nigeria,” South African Intellect. Prop. Law J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2019, doi: https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/EJC-1b5dcaa81c#.
  13. J. Hergueux and D. Jemielniak, “Should digital files be considered a commons? Copyright infringement in the eyes of lawyers,” Inf. Soc., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 198–215, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01972243.2019.1616019.
  14. M. F. Abad-García, “Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity,” An. Pediatría, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 57.e1-57.e8, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2018.11.006.
  15. T. Booth, A. Stuhmcke, and J. Wangmann, “There is Plagiarism … and Then There is Plagiarism: Academic Misconduct and Admission to Legal Practice,” Int. J. Leg. Prof., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 291–316, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09695958.2020.1749058.
  16. K. Gerdy, “Law Student Plagiarism: Why It Happens, Where It’s Found, and How to Find It,” Brigham Young Univ. Educ. Law J., vol. 2004, no. 2, pp. 431–440, 2004.
  17. L. Stearns, “Copy Wrong: Plagiarism, Process, Property, and the Law,” Calif. Law Rev., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 513–553, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.2307/3480772.
  18. O. C. F. Cajucom, “Plagiarism Within the Legal Profession and Academe,” Ateneo Law J., vol. 55, no. 787, pp. 787–817, 2010.
  19. E. Jereb et al., “Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 8, p. e0202252, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202252.
  20. T. Š. Božič, “On Plagiarism and Power Relations in Legal Academia and Legal Education,” Oñati Socio-legal Ser., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1589–1609, 2017.
  21. B. Martin, “Plagiarism, Misrepresentation, and Exploitation by Established Professionals: Power and Tactics,” in Handbook of Academic Integrity, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016, pp. 913–927.
  22. M. Foucault, Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. London: Penguin UK, 2019.
  23. Kumparan, “4 Akademisi Tanah Air yang Terjerat Kasus Plagiarisme,” Kumparan.com, 2018. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/4-akademisi-tanah-air-yang-terjerat-kasus-plagiarisme (accessed Dec. 20, 2020).
  24. Masriadi, “Dugaan Plagiarisme, 3 Dosen Dilaporkan ke Kemenristek Dikti,” kompas.com, 2019. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2019/03/04/14593841/dugaan-plagiarisme-3-dosen-dilaporkan-ke-kemenristek-dikti (accessed Dec. 20, 2020).
  25. A. Fauzan, “Ini Lima Rektor yang Tersandung Kasus Plagiat,” kabarkampus.com, 2017. https://kabarkampus.com/2017/10/ini-lima-rektor-yang-tersandung-kasus-plagiat/ (accessed Dec. 20, 2020).
  26. M. Favre, B. Swedlow, and M. Verweij, “A cultural theory and model of power relations,” J. Polit. Power, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 245–275, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2019.1624060.
  27. K. D. Becker, “Graduate students’ experiences of plagiarism by their professors,” High. Educ. Q., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 251–265, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12179.
  28. L. Negura, N. Plante, and M. Lévesque, “The role of social representations in the construction of power relations,” J. Theory Soc. Behav., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25–41, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12213.
  29. H. A. Castro, “The Legal Construction of Power in Deliberative Governance,” Law Soc. Inq., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 728–754, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1017/lsi.2019.74.
  30. J. L. Callahan, “The retrospective (im)moralization of self-plagiarism: Power interests in the social construction of new norms for publishing,” Organization, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 305–319, May 2018, doi: 10.1177/1350508417734926.
  31. M. Randall, Pragmatic Plagiarism: Authorship, Profit, and Power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001.
  32. D. A. Baldwin, Power and International Relations: A Conceptual Approach. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2016.
  33. E. C. B. Bittar, “Semiotics of Law, Juridicity and Legal System: Some Observations and Clarifications of a Theoretical Concept,” Int. J. Semiot. Law, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09797-4.
  34. G. Turkel, “Michel Foucault: Law, Power, and Knowledge,” J. Law Soc., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 170, 1990, doi: 10.2307/1410084.
  35. C. Smith, “The Sovereign State v Foucault: Law and Disciplinary Power,” Sociol. Rev., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 283–306, May 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00216.
  36. R. Dal-Ré, L. M. Bouter, P. Cuijpers, C. Gluud, and S. Holm, “Should Research Misconduct be Criminalized?,” Res. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 1–12, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1747016119898400.
  37. J. Saunders, “Plagiarism and the law,” Learn. Publ., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 279–292, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1087/20100402.
  38. P. I. Fusch, L. R. Ness, J. M. Booker, and G. E. Fusch, “The Ethical Implications of Plagiarism and Ghostwriting in an Open Society,” J. Soc. Chang., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55–63, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.5590/JOSC.2017.09.1.04.
  39. N. Olivia-Dumitrina, M. Casanovas, and Y. Capdevila, “Academic Writing and the Internet: Cyber-Plagiarism amongst University Students,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 112, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.7821/naer.2019.7.407.
  40. K. J. Heller, “Power, Subjectification and Resistance in Foucault,” SubStance, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 78, 1996, doi: 10.2307/3685230.
  41. S. O. Hansson, “Disguised Plagiarism,” Theoria, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 695–703, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1111/theo.12299.
  42. P. Deubel, “Punishment or Policy Change: A Case of Plagiarism in a Dissertation,” J. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–112, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.5590/JERAP.2018.08.1.08.
  43. N. C. Wahyuni, “When Plagiarism Is A Matter,” Rec. Libr. J., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 8, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.20473/rlj.V4-I1.2018.8-14.
  44. A. Ramalho and M. S. Silva, “‘I know It When I See It’: On Academic Plagiarism, and How to Assess It,” High. Educ. Futur., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 187–199, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2347631120932238.
  45. F. S. Sa’dy, A. F. Hamid, and M. A. M. Shareef, “Literary Plagiarism And Copyright Protection: A Study in Academic Ethics And Copyright Law,” J. Duhok Univ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 283–297, 2019.
  46. M. F. Abad-García, “Plagiarism and predatory journals: A threat to scientific integrity,” An. Pediatría, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 51–57, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2018.11.006.
  47. R. G. Young and T. F. Mitterboeck, “Perspectives for early-career researchers on plagiarism and scientific integrity,” FACETS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–25, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1139/facets-2019-0031.
  48. A. M. Carter, “The Case for Plagiarism,” UC Irvine Law Rev., vol. 9, no. 531, pp. 531–554, 2019.
  49. M. Thomas, T. Cockburn, and J. Yule, “Permissible plagiarism? Navigating normative expectations in the pre- and post-admission landscape,” Int. J. Leg. Prof., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 295–317, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1080/09695958.2017.1309319.
  50. B. Cioruța and M. Coman, “Is Plagiarism a Crime or Just a Condemnable Inspiration Method in the Digital World?!,” Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 27–37, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.9734/ajess/2020/v8i330227.
  51. O. O. Agunloye, “Ethics in academic research and scholarship: An elucidation of the principles and applications,” J. Glob. Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 168–180, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.5038/2577-509X.3.2.1036.