Rechtsidee

Vol. 9 (2021): December
Anticorruption Law

The Breaking Down Political Corruption: The Urgency of Progressive Law Enforcement: Pembongkaran Korupsi Politik: Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Progresif

View Article
  • Abdul Wahid
Abdul Wahid
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v9i0.774
Categories

Published 2021-12-16

Keywords

  • Progressive Law,
  • Political Corruption,
  • anti-corruption

How to Cite

Wahid, A. (2021). The Breaking Down Political Corruption: The Urgency of Progressive Law Enforcement: Pembongkaran Korupsi Politik: Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Rechtsidee, 9, 10.21070/jihr.v9i0.774. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v9i0.774
Copyright Notice
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Political corruption is one of the legal phenomena in the form of corruption carried out by involving political actors or power actors. Political corruption is a phenomenon that occurs in almost all parts of the world and is a global problem. This study aims to explore the value and substance of progressive law as a solution in dealing with political corruption in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research. This research specifically prioritizes socio-legal aspects, namely non-legal aspects that can enlighten and clarify the description of problems in political corruption. The legal materials used are primary legal materials which include: the Corruption Law, the Amendment to the Corruption Crime Act, and the UNCAC ratification law. Secondary legal materials include the results of studies and research on political corruption in Indonesia, and non-legal materials include various non-legal studies and analyzes related to political corruption that support this research. The approach used is a statutory approach as well as a conceptual approach. The results of the study confirm that the urgency of progressive law in breaking down political corruption needs to be carried out because the orientation of progressive law does not only focus on rules, but also emphasizes behavioral aspects. The orientation and formulation of progressive law in breaking down political corruption is to emphasize the behavioral dimension in the form of leadership and professionalism in terms of substance, structure, and legal culture.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. E. O. S. Hiariej, “United Nations Convention Against Corruption dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia,” Mimb. Huk. - Fak. Huk. Univ. Gadjah Mada, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 112, 2019, doi: 10.22146/jmh.43968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.43968
  2. A. J. Brown and F. Heinrich, “National Integrity Systems – An evolving approach to anti-corruption policy evaluation,” Crime, Law Soc. Chang., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 283–292, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10611-017-9707-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9707-1
  3. K. S. Wahyuningrum, H. S. Disemadi, and N. S. P. Jaya, “Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah Ada?,” Refleks. Huk. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 239–258, 2020, doi: 10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p239-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p239-258
  4. J. I Ketut Patra, “Korupsi, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Kemiskinan Di Indonesia,” Ris. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2018, doi: 10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i1.5609
  5. A. Atilgan, Global Constitutionalism: A Socio-legal Perspective, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer Nature, 2018.
  6. R. Skandiva and B. Harefa, “Urgensi Penerapan Foreign Bribery Dalam Konvensi Antikorupsi di Indonesia,” Integritas J. Antikorupsi, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 245–262, 2022, doi: 10.32697/integritas.v7i2.826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.826
  7. A. K. Sari, S. Sari, and B. Risdiyanto, “Analisis Semiotika Sosial Pemberitaan Kasus Korupsi E-Ktp Di Situs Liputan6.Com,” J. Prof., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 87–111, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v4i1.452
  8. L. N. Simarmata, “Korupsi Sekarang Dan Yang Akan Datang,” J. Ilm. Huk. Dirgant., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 87–99, 2021.
  9. A. Oktaryal and P. Hastuti, “Desain Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Partai Politik di Indonesia,” Integritas, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2021, doi: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.729
  10. Launa and H. Lusianawati, “Potensi Korupsi Dana Bansos di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” Maj. Semi Ilm. Pop. Komun. Massa, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2021.
  11. N. Ata, “Praktik Ijon Politik Pada Kasus Korupsi Kepala Daerah; Studi Kasus Korupsi Dana Alokasi Khusus (Dak) Pendidikan,” J. Gov. Innov., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–83, 2022, doi: 10.36636/jogiv.v4i1.1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v4i1.1187
  12. I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
  13. R. Banakar and M. Travers, “Introduction to Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research,” in THEORY AND METHOD IN SOCIAL-LEGAL RESEARCH, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005, pp. 1–8.
  14. S. Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2010.
  15. A. Y. Sulistyawan, “Liberalisme dan Rasionalitas sebagai Basis Rule of Law: Perspektif Gerald Turkel,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 188, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.173-200
  16. S. Sayuti, “Arah Kebijakan Pembentukan Hukum Kedepan (Pendekatan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Teori Hukum Progresif, dan Teori Hukum Integratif),” Al Risal., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 11–22, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v13i02.407
  17. N. R. Wildan Nafis, “Hukum Progresif dan Relevansinya Pada Penalaran Hukum di Indonesia,” El Ahli J. Huk. Kel. Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56874/el-ahli.v1i2.313
  18. T. L. I. Robert Pranata, Erlyn Indarti, “Penemuan Hukum dan Pradigma: Suatu Telaah Filsafat Hukum Tentang Proses Peradilan Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Semarang,” Diponegoro Law J., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2016.
  19. Z. Zulqarnain, M. Ikhlas, and R. Ilhami, “Perception of college students on civic and anti-corruption education : Importance and relevance,” Integritas J. Antikorupsi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 123–134, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.854
  20. N. R. Putra and R. Linda, “Corruption in Indonesia : A challenge for social changes,” Integritas J. Antikorupsi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.898
  21. J. A. Dewantara et al., “Anti-corruption education as an effort to form students with character humanist and law-compliant,” J. Civ. Media Kaji. Kewarganegaraan, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2021, doi: 10.21831/jc.v18i1.38432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v18i1.38432
  22. Kolimin and Wijaya, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Pengurus Koperasi,” J. Juristilk, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v1i02.1651
  23. W. Dwi Putro, “Pancasila Di Era Paska Ideologi,” Verit. Justitia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2019, doi: 10.25123/vej.3233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3233
  24. M. Al, I. Bintarto, R. Abubakri, and A. Zulhaj, “Politik Hukum Penegakan Tindakan Korupsi Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19,” Ilmu Huk., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 349–360, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v10i2.8125
  25. D. Herdiana, “Pemindahan Ibukota Negara: Upaya Pemerataan Pembangunan ataukah Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan yang Baik,” J. Transform., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2022, doi: 10.21776/ub.transformative.2022.008.01.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2022.008.01.1
  26. R. M. A. Ilyasa, “Prinsip Pembangunan Infrastruktur yang Berlandaskan HAM Terhadap Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Indonesia,” Sasi, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 380, 2020, doi: 10.47268/sasi.v26i3.296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i3.296
  27. M. D. Pane, “Aspek Hukum Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah, Suatu Tinjauan Yuridis Peraturan Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah,” J. Media Huk., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 147–155, 2017, doi: 10.18196/jmh.2017.0090.147-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0090.147-155
  28. Wayan Rudi Pranata, “Oprasi Tangkap Tangan Kpk Terhadap Kementrian Kelautan Dan Perikanan Edhy Prabowo Terkait Kasus Korupsi Ekspor Benih Lobster,” J. Media Komun. Pendidik. Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 3, no. April, pp. 37–48, 2021.
  29. I. S. Latif and I. A. Pangestu, “Problematika Penyalahgunaan Bantuan Sosial Pada Masa Pandemi,” Justisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 95–107, 2022, doi: 10.33506/js.v8i2.1612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v8i2.1612
  30. M. Crouch, “The challenges for court reform after authoritarian rule: The role of specialized courts in indonesia,” Const. Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: 10.31078/consrev711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev711
  31. D. E. Prasetio, “Menelisik Perjuangan Artidjo Alkostar: dari Paradigma Hukum Profetik Hingga Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Politik.” syakal.iainkediri.ac.id, Kediri, p. 3, 2021.
  32. A. Alkostar, Korupsi Politik di Negara Modern, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2015.
  33. Dicky Eko Prasetio Adam Ilyas Felix Ferdin Bakker, “Membangun Moralitas dan Hukum Sebagai Integrative Mechanism di Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif,” Mimb. Keadilan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 128–138, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v14i2.4694
  34. R. S. Markus Marselinus Soge, “Kajian Hukum Progresif Terhadap Fungsi Pemasyarakatan Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemasyarakatan,” Leg. J. Huk. dan Perundang-Undangan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5–24, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2022.2.2.79-101
  35. A. Suntoro, “Implementasi Pencapaian Secara Progresif dalam Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja,” J. HAM, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.30641/ham.2021.12.1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.1-18
  36. M. Z. Aulia, “Friedrich Carl von Savigny tentang Hukum: Hukum sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 201–236, 2020, doi: 10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236
  37. A. Buyse, K. Fortin, B. M. Leyh, and J. Fraser, “The Rule of Law from Below – A Concept Under Development,” Utr. Law Rev., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.771
  38. Suteki, Desain Hukum di Ruang Sosial, 1st ed. Semarang: Thafa Media, 2013.
  39. Sudjana, “Penerapan Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence W Friedman Terhadap Efektivitas Perlindungan Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2000,” AL Amwal, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 82, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/njis.2020.1.2.82-87
  40. A. Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum & Teori Peradilan Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Volume 1 Pemahaman Awal, 7th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  41. H. A. M. Irwanto Eka Putra Rahim , Audyna Mayasari Muin, “Justice Collaborator dalam Mengungkap Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Irwanto,” Petitum, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 2022.