Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 1 (2022): June
Business Law

Royalty as a Way to Protect Creator: Current Conditions in Indonesia
Royalti Sebagai Cara Melindungi Pencipta: Kondisi Saat Ini di Indonesia

View Article
  • Sitti Fatimah Maddusila*
Sitti Fatimah Maddusila
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.780


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 15, 2022
Keywords
  • Royalty,
  • Intellectual Property Rights,
  • Legal Value
How to Cite
Maddusila, S. F. (2022). Royalty as a Way to Protect Creator: Current Conditions in Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 10(1), 10.21070/jihr.v10i0.780. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.780

Copyright (c) 2022 Sitti Fatimah Maddusila (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

One of the legal rights that must be protected is intellectual property rights. This study analyzes intellectual property legal protection aspects based on a royalty system. This research is the normative legal research to produce legal arguments, usually called legal prescriptions. This study uses primary legal materials, which include: the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Patent Law, the Copyright Law, the Government Regulation on Song and/or Music Royalties, also the Plant Variety Royalties Act. Secondary legal materials include the results of studies and research on aspects of royalties in intellectual property rights. Non-legal material includes various non-legal studies of the royalty system in intellectual property. The approach in this research is a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the implication of the implementation of the royalty system in intellectual property rights requires the state to realize three fundamental legal values ​​related to royalty policies, such as guarantees of legal certainty over the rules regarding royalties, guarantees of benefit from the distribution of royalties, as well as guarantees of fair distribution of royalties based on the principle of proportionality. In addition, legal protection with a royalty system in intellectual property rights needs to be carried out externally and internally.

Highlights: 

  • Royalty system needs legal certainty, benefits, and fair distribution.
  • Fair distribution based on proportionality is important.
  • External and internal legal protection is necessary.

Keywords: Royalty, Intellectual Property Rights, Legal Value

 

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. N. Lathif, “Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana Alat untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat,” PALAR | PAKUAN LAW Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–94, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.33751/palar.v3i1.402.
  2. D. G. Atmadja, “Asas - asas hukum dalam sistem hukum,” Kertha Wicaksana, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2018.
  3. S. Munandar, “Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum pada Tahap Penyidikan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Padang),” Pagaruyuang Law J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 42–63, 2018.
  4. D. S. Kristianti, “Prinsip Kebersamaan Dalam Hukum Investasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja: Politik Hukum Kepentingan Investasi Ataukah Kesejahteraan Masyarakat,” PAMALI Pattimura Magister Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90–113, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.47268/pamali.v1i2.619.
  5. A. P. Pebri Tuwanto, Kholis Roisah, “Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) terhadap Invensi di Ruang Angkasa,” Doponegoro Law J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2016.
  6. I Kadek Sukadana, G. Ayu, and P. Nia, “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Geguritan Bali Di Indonesia,” J. Media Komun., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 108–120, 2021.
  7. D. Handoko, Hukum Positif Mengenai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia Jilid II, 1st ed. Pekanbaru: HAWA dan AHWA, 2015.
  8. Y. M. Yulianty Jacob, I. A. Tungga, and U. L. Peku Wali, “Intervention of Intellectual Property Rights on Household Industry Productivity,” J. Din. Huk., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 74, 2019, doi: 10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.1.2478.
  9. Z. Zufikri, “Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights: What Is Urgency For The Business World?,” J. IUS Kaji. Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–111, 2021.
  10. E. J. Sinaga, “Pengelolaan Royalti atas Pengumuman Karya Cipta Lagu dan/atau Musik,” J. Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 553, 2020, doi: 10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.553-578.
  11. I. E. J. Nathaniela Putri Arumdhani, “Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Atas Objek Musik dan Lagu,” Halu Oleo Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 208, 2021.
  12. Z. A. Rizky Syahputra, Doddy Kridasaksana, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Musisi Atas Hak Cipta Dalam Pembayaran Royalti,” Semarang Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 85, 2022.
  13. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  14. Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Media, 2020.
  15. B. Aswandi and K. Roisah, “Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham),” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 128, 2019, doi: 10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145.
  16. H. Juwana, “Kewajiban Negara dalam Proses Ratifikasi Perjanjian Internasional: Memastikan Keselarasan dengan Konstitusi dan Mentransformasikan ke Hukum Nasional,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.22437/ujh.2.1.1-32.
  17. M. I. Hilmy and R. H. N. Azmi, “Konstruksi Pertahanan Dan Keamanan Negara Terhadap Perlindungan Data Dalam Cyberspace Untuk Menghadapi Pola Kebiasaan Baru,” Kaji. Lemb. Ketahanan Nas. Republik Indones., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 579, 2021.
  18. H. Christianto, “From Crime Control Model to Due Process Model: A Critical Study of Wiretapping Arrangement by the Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia,” PADJADJARAN J. Ilmu Huk. (Journal Law), vol. 7, no. 3, p. 422, 2020.
  19. E. Vonk, Gijsbert, Bambrough, “The human rights approach to social assistance: Normative principles and system characteristics,” Eur. J. Soc. Secur., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 376–389, 2020.
  20. L. O. Gostin and B. M. Meier, “Introducing Global Health Law,” J. Law, Med. Ethics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 788–793, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1073110519897794.
  21. R. Posner, Economic Approach to Law, 9th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 2012.
  22. T. Harnowo, “Law as Technological Control of the Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Era,” Corp. Trade Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2022.
  23. J. C. Thompson, “Law’s Autonomy and Moral Reason,” Laws, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/laws8010006.
  24. E. Alistar (Hîrlav), “The Relation Between Law and Morality,” in Research Association For Interdisciplinary Studies, 2019, no. 3, pp. 2–4, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3388103.
  25. H. Salwén, “Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 27, no. 67, p. 68, 2021.
  26. D. A. I. Deslaely Putranti, “Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis oleh Masyarakat Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Pasca Sertifikasi di Yogyakarta,” Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 397, 2021.
  27. R. Asher, “Unresolved Injustice : An Examination of Indigenous Legal Issues in Australia,” Udayana J. Law Cult., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 146–170, 2020.
  28. D. Plunkett and S. Shapiro, “Law, morality, and everything else: General jurisprudence as a branch of metanormative inquiry,” Ethics, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 37–68, 2017, doi: 10.1086/692941.
  29. I. Rahmatullah, “Filsafat Hukum Utilitarianisme: Konsep dan Aktualisasinya Dalam Hukum di Indonesia,” Adalah Bul. Huk. Keadilan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19–32, 2021, doi: 10.15408/adalah.v5i2.22026.
  30. M. Alen, “Tinjauan Normatif Kedudukan Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional (LMKN) sebagai State Auxiliary Organ berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 56 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolan Royalti Hak Cipta Lagu dan/atau Musik,” Dialogia Iurid. J. Huk., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 11, 2022.
  31. G. D. Ramadhan, “Ruang Lingkup Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Video Game,” J. Intellect. Prop., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2021.
  32. L. G. Lerman, P. G. Schrag, and R. Rubinson, Ethical Problems in the Practice of Law, 5th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2020.
  33. Z. Saiin, A., Armita, P., Rizki, M., & Hudiyani, “Wakaf atas Royalti sebagai Hak Ekonomi dalam Intellectual Property Rights,” Al-Awqaf J. Wakaf Dan Ekon. Islam, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 167, 2019.
  34. A. Y. Mario Julyano, Sulistyawan, “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum,” J. Crepido, vol. 01, no. 01, p. pp.13-22, 2019.
  35. G. G. Bateman, “The Ough To Be a Law: Gustav Radbruch, Lon L. Fuller, and H.L.A. Hart on The Choice Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism,” J. Jurisprud., vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 13–15, 2019, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqi042.
  36. H. Matnuh, “Law as a Tool of Social Engineering,” in 1st International Conference on Social Sciences Education "Multicultural, 2018, vol. 147, no. Icsse 2017, pp. 118–120, doi: 10.2991/icsse-17.2018.28.
  37. H. H. Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?,” Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 272, 2022.
  38. M. Isnaeni, Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Surabaya: PT. Revka Petra Media, 2016.