Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 1 (2022): June
Customary Law

The Construction of Customary Values as Part of The Agreements’s Validity
Konstruksi Nilai Adat Sebagai Bagian Dari Keabsahan Perjanjian

View Article
  • Christina Bagenda*,
  • Cicilia Helena Carbonilla
Christina Bagenda
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Flores, Indonesia *
Cicilia Helena Carbonilla
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Flores, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.781


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 16, 2022
Keywords
  • Customary Values,
  • Private Law,
  • Validity of the Agreement
How to Cite
Bagenda, C., & Carbonilla, C. H. (2022). The Construction of Customary Values as Part of The Agreements’s Validity. Rechtsidee, 10(1), 10.21070/jihr.v10i0.781. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.781

Copyright (c) 2022 Christina Bagenda, Cicilia Helena Carbonilla (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Agreement is one of the important aspects in civil law. This is because the agreement is one of the legal actions that are often and commonly carried out in everyday life. Article 1320 of the Civil Code actually confirms the conditions for the validity of the agreement, such as: competent, agree, certain things, are allowed by law. However, in practice, something that is permitted by law is not only interpreted as permitted by positive or written law. However, it also includes unwritten legal values in society, which in this case includes Customary Values. This study aims to verify the legal terms of the agreement, including the inclusion of customary values as a valid condition of the agreement. This research is a normative legal research with a conceptual approach and legislation. The novelty in this research is the effort to extend the legal terms of the agreement, especially the halal cause or things that are permitted by law, including those permitted by unwritten law, in this case the customary values that apply in society. The results of this study confirm that with a futuristic and extensive interpretation, the meaning of halal causes or things permitted by law as a condition for the validity of the agreement must be expanded so that it includes unwritten law including customary values. Customary values that are still alive and valid in society are categorized as living law so that they become unwritten law. Because it is still valid in the community, customary values as unwritten law must be considered rights in making an agreement. This confirms that local customary values as long as they are still valid and live in the community can be a parameter as a condition for the validity of the agreement through the expansion of halal causes or something permitted by law in Article 1320 of the Civil Code.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. M. Hirschboeck, “Conceptualizing the relationship between international human rights law and private international law,” Harvard Int. Law J., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 181–199, 2019.
  2. E. J. Sinaga, “Pengelolaan Royalti atas Pengumuman Karya Cipta Lagu dan/atau Musik,” J. Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 553, 2020, doi: 10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.553-578.
  3. I. A. Krismat Hutagalung, Hasnati, “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Perjanjian Baku Yang Merugikan Konsumen,” Mizan, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 209, 2021.
  4. A. R. Lutfiana Dwi Mayasari, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian Pemisahan Harta dalam Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015,” J. Econ. Law, Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 25, 2022.
  5. N. M. I. Maharani, A. A. S. L. Dewi, and L. P. Suryani, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak Yang Telah Terikat Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar),” J. Analog. Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 2020, doi: 10.22225/ah.2.1.1615.119-123.
  6. D. Syamsiah, “Kajian Terkait Keabsahan Perjanjian E-Commerce Bila Ditinjau Dari Pasal 1320 Kuhperdata Tentang Syarat Sah Perjanjian,” Inov. Penelit., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 328, 2021.
  7. B. Suhariyanto, “Problema Penyerapan Adat oleh Pengadilan dan Pengaruhnya bagi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional,” Mimb. Huk. - Fak. Huk. Univ. Gadjah Mada, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 421, 2018, doi: 10.22146/jmh.33227.
  8. I. W. W. Herianto Sinaga, “Keabsahan Kontrak Elektronik (E-Contract) Dalam Perjanjian Bisnis,” Kertha Semaya, vol. 8, no. 9, p. 1386, 2020.
  9. K. S. Komang Srishti Pranisa, Komang Febrinayanti Dantes, “Analisis Keabsahan Perjanjian Dalam Transaksi Elektronik Melalui Media Facebook Advertising Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik,” Komunitas Yust., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 225, 2021.
  10. R. W. W. Mataniari Diana Teresa Naiborhu, Edi Wahjuni, “Keabsahan Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis Dalam Arisan Online (Studi Putusan Nomor. 106/Pdt.G/2017/PN Plk),” Ilmu Kenotariatan, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 55, 2022.
  11. G. T. Suteki, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, dan Praktik), 1st ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  12. Mustofa, “Hukum Adat Implikasi Dan Aplikasinya Dalam Istinbath Hukum Di Indonesia Perspektif Universalitas Dan Lokalitas,” Varia Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 267–287, 2019.
  13. A. Y. Mario Julyano, Sulistyawan, “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum,” J. Crepido, vol. 01, no. 01, p. pp.13-22, 2019.
  14. Sofyan Hadi, “Kekuatan Mengikat Hukum dalam Perspektif Mazhab Hukum Alam dan Mazhab Positivisme Hukum,” J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 14, no. 28, pp. 76–84, 2019.
  15. F. P. Disantara, “Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum,” Al-Adalah J. Huk. dan Polit. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2021, doi: 10.35673/ajmpi.v6i1.1129.
  16. A. Budiono and W. V. Izziyana, “Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Keilmuan Perspektif Paradigma Holistik,” J. Huk. Nov., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 89, 2018, doi: 10.26555/novelty.v9i1.a6916.
  17. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, N. H. Azzahra, and D. Perwitasari, “Strategi Pluralisme Hukum Peradilan Adat Sendi dalam Era Modernisasi Hukum,” rechtsidee, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9, 2021.
  18. A. Hidayat and Z. Arifin, “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia,” J. Ius Const., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 147–159, 2019, doi: 10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654.
  19. F. S. Raden Roro, A. Y. Hernoko, and G. Anand, “the Characteristics of Proportionality Principle in Islamic Crowdfunding in Indonesia,” J. Huk. Pembang., vol. 49, no. 2, p. 455, 2019, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2013.
  20. E. Masri and S. Wahyuni, “Implementasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebelum, Saat Dan Sesudah Perkawinan,” J. Kaji. Ilm., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2021, doi: 10.31599/jki.v21i1.310.
  21. Y. Marpi, Erlangga, B. T. Endaryono, and K. Noviani, “Legal effective of putting ‘Business as Usual’ clause in agreements,” Int. J. Criminol. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 58–70, 2021, doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.09.
  22. D. Yuanitasari, “Pengembangan Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Pelaksanaan Asas Itikad Baik Pada Tahap Pra Kontraktual,” ACTA DIURNAL J. Ilmu Huk. Kenotariatan Fak. Huk. Unpad Pengemb. Huk. PERJANJIAN DALAM Pelaks. ASAS ITIKAD BAIK PADA Thp. PRA Kontrakt., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 4, 2020.
  23. E. R. Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti, “Analisis peraturan perkawinan beda agama di berbagai negara sebagai perlindungan hukum untuk membentuk keluarga,” Cakrawala Huk., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 72, 2020.
  24. B. Tripkovic, “The morality of foreign law,” Int. J. Const. Law, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 732–755, 2019, doi: 10.1093/icon/moz065.
  25. B. Budi Priambodo, “Positioning Adat Law in the Indonesia’s Legal System: Historical Discourse and Current Development on Customary Law,” Udayana J. Law Cult., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 140, 2018, doi: 10.24843/ujlc.2018.v02.i02.p02.
  26. K. von Benda-Beckmann, “Anachronism, Agency, and the Contextualisation of Adat: Van Vollenhoven’s Analyses in Light of Struggles Over Resources,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 397–415, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670242.
  27. J. Corrin, “Plurality and Punishment: Competition Between State and Customary Authorities in Solomon Islands,” J. Leg. Plur. Unoff. Law, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 29–47, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07329113.2018.1540121.
  28. K. Warman, S. Isra, and H. Tegnan, “Enhancing legal pluralism: The role of adat and Islamic laws within the Indonesian legal system,” J. Leg. Ethical Regul. Issues, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2018.
  29. F. Arofah, “Kesadaran Kolektif dan Upaya Menuntut Pengakuan Desa Adat: Kasus Masyarakat Adat Sendi di Mojokerto, Jawa Timur,” JISPO J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2020, doi: 10.15575/jispo.v10i1.6665.
  30. I. Arlado, “Perjuangan Warga Sendi, ‘Desa’ Adat di Mojokerto, Mengejar Pengakuan.” jawapos.com, 2018.
  31. A. H. Romadhon, I. Harianti, N. Royhana, and M. Agustina, “Dinamika Pranata Pemerintahan Desa Adat Dalam Dimensi Hukum Tata Negara,” J. Huk. Media Bhakti, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2018, doi: 10.32501/jhmb.v2i2.31.
  32. N. Neng Yani, Hukum Perdata. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2015.
  33. S. Shidarta, “Bernard Arief Sidharta: Dari Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis ke Pembentukan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 441–476, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.22437/ujh.3.2.441-476.
  34. Y. Hetharie, “Perjanjian Nominee sebagai Sarana Penguasaan Hak Milik atas Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata,” Sasi, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 29, 2019.
  35. R. Khoiril Jamil, Nury & Rumawi, “Implikasi Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Keadaan Memaksa (Force Majeure) Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia,” J. Kertha Semaya, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1044–1054, 2020.
  36. J. Barton-Crosby, “The nature and role of morality in situational action theory,” Eur. J. Criminol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1477370820977099.
  37. A. Iffan, “Keberadaan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dan Good Faith Menurut Hukum Internasional dan Hukum Islam,” J. Equitable, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–48, 2018.
  38. J. A. Pojanowski, “Neoclassical Administrative Law,” Harv. Law Rev., vol. 133, p. 852, 2019.
  39. L. A. DiMatteo, “‘Rule of Law’ in China: The confrontation of formal law with cultural norms,” Cornell Int. Law J., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 391–444, 2018.
  40. M. Iovan, “Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity,” J. Legal Stud., vol. 25, no. 39, pp. 57–68, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.2478/jles-2020-0004.
  41. M. Isnaeni, Perjanjian Jual Beli. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2016.
  42. M. M. Pitrotussaadaha, “Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Menurut Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia dan Hukum Islam,” J. Muttaqien, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2020.
  43. R. A. Cendikia Aurelie Maharani, “Akta Penegasan Perjanjian Perkawinan Kaitannya dengan Pemenuhan Prinsip Publisitas,” Notaire, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 285, 2021, doi: 10.20473/ntr.v4i2.27168.
  44. A. Y. Hernoko, “Keseimbangan Versus Keadilan Dalam Kontrak (Upaya Menata Struktur Hubungan Bisnis Dalam Perspektif Kontrak Yang Berkeadilan).” Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, pp. 7–9, 2010.
  45. B. A. P. A. Wirawan, I. N. P. B. Warmadewa, and N. M. P. Ujianti, “Wanprestasi Pihak Debitur dalam Perjanjian Non Kontraktual dengan Jaminan Gadai,” Konstr. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 41, 2022.
  46. E. P. Pane, “Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Berbasis Online,” Locus J. Acad. Lit. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 39, 2022.
  47. A. Bedner and Y. Arizona, “Adat in Indonesian Land Law: A Promise for the Future or a Dead End?,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 416–434, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246.