Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 1 (2022): June
International Law

Legal Uncertainty Regarding the Application of The Principle of Territoriality in the Immigration Area
Ketidakpastian Hukum Penerapan Asas Teritorialitas pada Area Imigrasi

View Article
  • Rizal Fitroh Dwi Widodo*,
  • M. Hafiz Rifa’i,
  • Jhonata Wiratama
Rizal Fitroh Dwi Widodo
Politeknik Imigrasi Badan Pengembangan Sumber Data Manusia Hukum dan HAM Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Indonesia *
M. Hafiz Rifa’i
Politeknik Imigrasi Badan Pengembangan Sumber Data Manusia Hukum dan HAM Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia , Indonesia
Jhonata Wiratama
Politeknik Imigrasi Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Hukum dan HAM Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.785


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 29, 2022
Keywords
  • Territory Principle,
  • Immigration Area,
  • Legal Certainty
How to Cite
Widodo, R. F. D., Rifa’i, M. H., & Wiratama, J. (2022). Legal Uncertainty Regarding the Application of The Principle of Territoriality in the Immigration Area. Rechtsidee, 10(1), 10.21070/jihr.v10i0.785. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.785

Copyright (c) 2022 Rizal Fitroh Dwi Widodo, M. Hafiz Rifa’i, Jhonata Wiratama (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The area of ​​immigration is an important aspect of immigration law enforcement and practice. This is because the immigration area preventively represents the sovereignty of a country. Even so, in the Immigration Law in Indonesia there are no special regulations regarding the immigration area. So there is the problem of a legal vacuum related to special regulations regarding the immigration area. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study confirm that the principle of territoriality in the immigration area requires legal certainty. This is because in the practice of immigration, the principle of territoriality is an important principle, one of which is trying to prevent it from protecting the sovereignty of the state. In addition, the government needs to make a special legal product that regulates immigration areas in the form of Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations which can then be followed up technically with the regulations below. Technical follow-up to Government Regulations and Presidential Regulations can be in the form of a Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs and specifically technical instructions regarding immigration areas can be formed for officers and law enforcement officers in the immigration sector who are specifically tasked with immigration areas.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. J. Barton-Crosby, “The nature and role of morality in situational action theory,” Eur. J. Criminol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1477370820977099.
  2. H. Kissinger, Diplomacy Law. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2011.
  3. G. Duke, “Law’s Normative Point,” Law Philos., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10982-018-9334-8.
  4. S. Rokilah Rokilah, “Penerapan Asas Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan,” Ajudikasi J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–190, 2021.
  5. K. E. Himma and B. Bix, Law and Morality. Routledge, 2017.
  6. K. E. Himma, Morality and the Nature of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
  7. M. A. Hamdi, “Punishment for Foreign Citizens That Make an Abuse of Free Visit Visa,” J. Ilm. Kaji. Keimigrasian, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2019, doi: 10.52617/jikk.v2i1.65.
  8. B. Z. Tamanaha, A realistic theory of law, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  9. J. Ezenwajiaku, State Territory and International Law. New York: Routledge, 2020.
  10. N. Krisch, “Jurisdiction Unbound: (Extra)territorial Regulation as Global Governance,” Eur. J. Int. Law, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 481–514, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1093/ejil/chac028.
  11. H. Hannum, D. L. Shelton, and R. C. S. James Anaya, International Human Rights: Problems of Law, Policy, and Practice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2017.
  12. J. S. W. Park, Immigration Law and Society. New York: Polity Press, 2018.
  13. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008.
  14. M. Syahrin, Perbatasan Imajiner Indonesia dalam Prinsip Hukum Keimigrasian, no. August. 2020.
  15. Y. K. Spies, “The Law of Diplomacy,” in Global Diplomacy and International Society, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 101–142.
  16. D. E. Purwoleksono, Hukum Pidana, 1st ed. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2016.
  17. S. T. Indarti, “Kebijakan Keimigrasian Di Masa Covid-19: Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia,” HAM, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 26, 2021.
  18. G. A. Made Widnyani, “Eksistensi Area Imigrasi Pada Tempat Pemeriksaan Imigrasi Di Indonesia,” J. Magister Huk. Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), vol. 5, no. 1, p. 101, 2016, doi: 10.24843/jmhu.2016.v05.i01.p10.
  19. E. N. Zahara, “Dirjen Imigrasi: Waspadai Ancaman ‘Multiple Criminal Act,’” Majalah BhumiPura. KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAM RI DIREKTORAT JENDERAL IMIGRASI, p. 8, 2019.
  20. R. N. S. Kresna, I Gusti Putu Anom and M. A. Alfarizi, “Potret Hukum Tindakan Administrasif Keimigrasian,” J. Law Bord. Prot., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2022.
  21. J. L. Reasoning, M. R. Qalandy, U. Sriwijaya, M. A. Syahrin, P. Imigrasi, and I. Tinggal, “Law Enforcement Instrument for Foreign Workers who Abuse Immigration Stay Permit,” J. Leg. Reason., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021.
  22. R. H. Hudan, “Kontradiksi Operation Sovereign Borders Australia Terhadap Peratifikasian Konvensi Pengungsi Tahun 1951,” 2019.
  23. S. I. G. Agaton, “The Kantian Categorical Imperative and Marawi Refugees: Affirming the Importance of the Anti-Terrorism Law,” Masyarakat, Kebud. Dan Polit., vol. 35, no. 2, p. 233, 2022.
  24. H. Fernando, “Penerapan Asas Teritorial Tindak Pidana Penangkapan Ikan Secara Illegal Oleh Kapal Asing,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1–56, 2013.
  25. K. Kittichaisaree, International Human Rights Law and Diplomacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
  26. B. D. Anggono, “TERTIB JENIS, HIERARKI, DAN MATERI MUATAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN:PERMASALAHAN DAN SOLUSINYA,” Masal. Huk., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018.
  27. B. D. Anggono, Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Penataan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2020.
  28. H. Wijayanti, Hukum Kewarganegaraan dan Hukum Keimigrasian, 1st ed. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2010.
  29. K. R. Aisyah Nurannisa Muhlisa, “Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Visa Izin Tinggal Kunjungan Lewat Batas Waktu (Overstay) Pada Warga Negara Asing,” Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 147, 2020.
  30. D. Rahmawati, Atma, Lia, Hariani, “Analisis Penerapan E-Government Pada Sistem Informasi Manajemen Keimigrasian (Simkim) Di Kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 Kota Semarang,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019.
  31. G. A. dan A. D. Basniwati, Hukum Keimigrasian, 1st ed. Mataram: Pustaka Bangsa, 2020.
  32. Aprianis, “Pengaruh Standar Operasional Prosedur (Sop) Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Tempat Pemeriksaan Imigrasi (Tpi) Bandar Lampung,” J. Ilmu Manaj. Saburai, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 48, 2021.
  33. M. A. Syahrin, “Polarisasi Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian Kontemporer: Aksiologi Normatif - Empiris,” Maj. Huk. Nas., vol. 49, no. 1, p. 60, 2019.
  34. Y. Y. Mohd Feri Andria, Muhammad Nasir, “Analisis Peran Pengawasan Kantor Imigrasi Kota Lhokseumawe Terhadap Keberadaan Orang Asing,” Suloh, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 49, 2021.