Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Constitutional Law

The Need for National and State Ethics Laws in Indonesia
Perlunya Undang-Undang Etika Berbangsa dan Bernegara di Indonesia

View Article
  • Soebagio Boerhan*,
  • Dudik Djaja Sidharta
Soebagio Boerhan
Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia *
Dudik Djaja Sidharta
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.788


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 12, 2022
Keywords
  • National and State Ethics,
  • Constitutional Law,
  • Ethical Norms
How to Cite
Boerhan, S., & Sidharta, D. D. (2022). The Need for National and State Ethics Laws in Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.788. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.788

Copyright (c) 2022 Soebagio Boerhan, Dudik Djaja Sidharta (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The study of constitutional law does not only study positive law, but also includes national and state ethics. Indonesia actually has TAP MPR No. 4 on the Ethics of National Life. Although in its application the ethics of nation and state are still not effective in practice in society. This study aims to examine TAP MPR No. VI concerning the Ethics of National Life and its implementation in various aspects and future arrangements. This research is a normative legal research. Legal materials in this study include primary, secondary, and non-legal materials. The approach in this study uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The results of the study confirmed that the implications of TAP MPR No. VI concerning the Ethics of National Life in constitutional law in Indonesia actually requires special arrangements in the Act so that it becomes the Law on the Ethics of National and State Life. The future implementation and regulation of the TAP MPR on National and State Ethics in Indonesian constitutional law can be carried out by establishing a Law on National and State Ethics which contains basic principles and is instrumentally and specifically determined by each agency, profession or group in society, combining the socialization of the four pillars of the MPR with the socialization of awareness of national and state ethics, and making awareness of national and state ethics as part of the national education system.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. R. Gupta, “The case for tax in democracies,” Aust. Tax Forum, vol. 35, no. August 2019, pp. 1–30, 2020.
  2. M. Crouch, “The challenges for court reform after authoritarian rule: The role of specialized courts in indonesia,” Const. Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: 10.31078/consrev711.
  3. C. R. Burset, “Why didn’t the common law follow the flag?.,” Va. Law Rev., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 2305–2341, 2019.
  4. H. Salwén, “Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 27, no. 67, p. 68, 2021.
  5. M. Nurdin, “Eksistensi Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (Dkpp) Dalam Penegakan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu,” Veritas, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 3, 2019.
  6. J. Asshidiqie, Perkembangan Baru Tentang Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme dalam Teori dan Praktik, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2018.
  7. M. Al Arif, “Mengkaji Konstruksi Politik Hukum Pengaturan Otonomi Desa Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa,” Arena Hukum, vol. 11, no. 1. pp. 119–138, 2018, doi: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.7.
  8. D. Y. Yudhyarta, “Pemberdayaan Etika Pancasila dalam Konteks Kehidupan Kampus,” Al Liqo, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 45, 2020.
  9. D. A. D. Fannia Sulistiani Putri, “Implementasi Pancasila sebagai Sistem Etika,” EduPsyCouns J. Educ. Psychol. Couns., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 178, 2021.
  10. D. A. D. Nurassyifa Qurotul Aini, “Sistem Etika Pancasila dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 11121, 2022.
  11. Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Media, 2020.
  12. A. Aryati, “Memahami Manusia Melalui Dimensi Filsafat (Upaya Memahami Eksistensi Manusia),” EL-AFKAR J. Pemikir. Keislam. dan Tafsir Hadis, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 79, 2018, doi: 10.29300/jpkth.v7i2.1602.
  13. C. Horn, “Aristotle on the Legal and Moral Aspects of Law,” in Ethics in Ancient Greek Literature, De Gruyter, 2020, pp. 81–100.
  14. F. P. Disantara, “Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat dalam Paradoks Etika dan Hukum,” J. LITIGASI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 205–229, 2021.
  15. T. Prasetyo, M. Muhammad, and I. Budhiati, Filsafat Pemilu Berbasis Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Yogyakarta: Penerbit K-Media, 2021.
  16. M. Vatter, “Dignity and the Foundation of Human Rights: Toward an Averroist Genealogy,” Polit. Relig., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 304–332, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S1755048319000336.
  17. B. Deffains and C. Fluet, “Social Norms and Legal Design,” J. Law, Econ. Organ., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 139–169, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewz016.
  18. F. Casoria, F. Galeotti, and M. C. Villeval, “Perceived social norm and behavior quickly adjusted to legal changes during the COVID-19 pandemic,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 190, pp. 54–65, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.030.
  19. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, N. H. Azzahra, and D. Perwitasari, “The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law,” Rechtsidee, vol. 8, pp. 1–14, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702.
  20. N. A. Sinaga, “Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik,” Ilm. Huk. Durgantara, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 3, 2020.
  21. K. E. Himma and B. Bix, Law and Morality. Routledge, 2017.
  22. J. Asshidiqie, Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi, 1st ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
  23. G. Duke, “Law’s Normative Point,” Law Philos., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10982-018-9334-8.
  24. E. Alistar (Hîrlav), “The Relation Between Law and Morality,” in Research Association For Interdisciplinary Studies, 2019, no. 3, pp. 2–4, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3388103.
  25. M. Iovan, “Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity,” J. Legal Stud., vol. 25, no. 39, pp. 57–68, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.2478/jles-2020-0004.
  26. N. Ata, “Praktik Ijon Politik Pada Kasus Korupsi Kepala Daerah; Studi Kasus Korupsi Dana Alokasi Khusus (Dak) Pendidikan,” J. Gov. Innov., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–83, 2022, doi: 10.36636/jogiv.v4i1.1187.
  27. S. Roy, “Theory of Social Proof and Legal Compliance: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for Regulatory (Non) Compliance,” Ger. Law J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 238–255, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1017/glj.2021.5.
  28. D. E. Prasetio, “Menelisik Perjuangan Artidjo Alkostar: dari Paradigma Hukum Profetik Hingga Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Politik.” syakal.iainkediri.ac.id, Kediri, p. 3, 2021.
  29. B. S. Prabowo and W. Wiryanto, “Konsistensi Pembuatan Norma Hukum dengan Doktrin Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Judicial Review,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 359, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31078/jk1925.
  30. K. F. Desip Trinanda, Yuliandri, “Problematika TAP MPR dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Peluang Judicial Review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Legis. Indones., vol. 19, no. 3, p. 398, 2022.
  31. S. Suatmiati and E. Kastro, “Legal and Institutional Framework on Counter-Terrorism in Indonesia,” J. Media Huk., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2020, doi: 10.18196/jmh.20200143.
  32. B. A. Garner and H. C. Black, Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th ed. Minnesotta: West Publishing Co, St. Paull, 2019.
  33. Herabudin, “Implementation Of Norms And Ethics In Public Services In Indonesia,” J. Ilm. MEA (Manajemen, Ekon. Akuntansi), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 1901, 2022.
  34. A. Atilgan, Global Constitutionalism: A Socio-legal Perspective, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer Nature, 2018.
  35. M. Mahrus, “Desain Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam,” J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 81–100, 2021, doi: 10.37286/ojs.v7i1.93.
  36. C. G. Geyh, “Judicial Ethics: A New Paradigm for a New Era,” St. Mary’s J. Leg. Malpract. Ethics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 239–255, 2019.
  37. Gladwin Lukman, F. Khu, Indra Kho, and Edric Victori, “Batas Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dan Etis Atas Perilaku Tercela Advokat Dalam Persidangan,” J. Huk. Samudra Keadilan, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 86–98, 2020, doi: 10.33059/jhsk.v15i1.2111.
  38. T. Oduol, “Teacher Professional Codes of Ethics of New Zealand and Kenya: A Document Analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 12, p. 150, 2020.
  39. P. F. P. Pratiwi, Suprayitno, and Triyani, “Existence of Customary Law through Comparative Education between Dayak Ngaju Customary Law and National Law,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Inst. Humanit., vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.882.
  40. G. G. Bateman, “The Ough To Be a Law: Gustav Radbruch, Lon L. Fuller, and H.L.A. Hart on The Choice Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism,” J. Jurisprud., vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 13–15, 2019, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqi042.
  41. W. B. Wendel, Ethics and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  42. O. Rosadi and A. Marwan, “Transformation of Legal Education in Indonesia Based on Social Justice,” J. Polit. Law, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 143, 2020, doi: 10.5539/jpl.v13n1p143.