Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Labor Law

The Legal Position of the Security Unit in the Perspective of Labor Law
Kedudukan Hukum Satuan Pengamanan dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan

View Article
  • Pribampudi Teguh*,
  • Mustakim
Pribampudi Teguh
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia *
Mustakim
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.791


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 27, 2022
Keywords
  • labor law,
  • security guard,
  • SATPAM
How to Cite
Teguh, P., & Mustakim. (2022). The Legal Position of the Security Unit in the Perspective of Labor Law. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.791. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.791

Copyright (c) 2022 Pribampudi Teguh, Mustakim (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal position of security guards in relation to labor law aspects. This research is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the legal position of a security guard in employment law is that in terms of duties and authorities, a security guard actually carries out the duties of the police, but in terms of rights and obligations in general, such as those related to wages, leave, overtime and so on, they should be based on labor provisions as stipulated in the Labor Law and the Job Creation Law. Regarding the guarantee of employment rights for security guards in the perspective of labor law based on the principle of ejusdem generis in general it can be equated with rights for workers in general, such as: the right to adequate wages, the right to leave, the right to health insurance, the right to severance pay, as well as the right to legal protection. However, there are rights that need to get special arrangements related to security guards in their position as special workers such as the right to associate and assemble which need to be further regulated through government regulations and presidential regulations which contain: the position of independent security guards, especially security guards, rights and obligations, as well as efforts and legal mechanisms.

Highlights:

  • Dual Role: Security guards perform police duties and have labor law rights.
  • Employment Rights: Guards' rights align with general workers.
  • Special Regulations: Specific rights need further government regulation.

Keywords: labor law, security guard, SATPAM

 

 

 

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. M. B. Caroles, “Hak Berserikat Satuan Pengamanan (Satpam) sebagai Pekerja dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia,” J. Mhs. Fak. Huk. Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2014.
  2. A. A. Farrel Eden Surbakti, “Perbandingan Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Kepolisian Dalam Konstitusi Yang Pernah Berlaku Di Indonesia,” Huk. dan Pembang., vol. 51, no. 1, p. 147, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.3012.
  3. S. Suatmiati and E. Kastro, “Legal and Institutional Framework on Counter-Terrorism in Indonesia,” J. Media Huk., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2020, doi: 10.18196/jmh.20200143.
  4. M. H. Mustofa, A. Timan, and W. Zulkarnain, “Analisis Pengembangan Karir Personel Satuan Pengamanan Universitas Negeri,” J. Adm. dan Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 172–180, 2019, doi: 10.17977/um027v2i42019p172.
  5. E. A. Retaduari, “Awal Mula Keberadaan Satpam, Didirikan Polri untuk Antisipasi Yakuza dan Mafia.” nasional.kompas.com, Jakarta, 2022.
  6. A. K. Ni’am, A. D. Irawan, and C. A. Dewanto, “Upaya Mewujudkan Pemuliaan Profesi Satuan Pengamanan Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Kepolisian Nomor 4 Tahun 2020,” Media Law Sharia, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 254–271, 2021, doi: 10.18196/mls.v2i3.11870.
  7. A. S. Zakiah Noer, “Kewenangan Satuan Pengaman Dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Dan Wewenang Kepolisian Terbatas,” J. Pro Huk., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2022.
  8. E. M. Al Amaren, A. M. A. Hamad, O. F. Al Mashhour, and M. I. Al Mashni, “An introduction to the legal research method: To clear the blurred image on how students understand the method of the legal science research,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Sci. Adv. Technol., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 50–55, 2020.
  9. A. Pristiono, “Kebijakan Kriminal (Criminal Policy) Dengan Konsep Mediasi Dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum (Penipuan Dan Penggelapan) Pada Bagwassidik Ditreskrimum Polda Sumut,” J. Ilm. Muqoddimah J. Ilmu Sos. Polit. dan Hummanioramaniora, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 34, 2020, doi: 10.31604/jim.v4i1.2020.34-43.
  10. H. Mardiansa and V. Sunarti, “Persepsi Peserta Pelatihan Satuan Pengamanan Gada Pratama Terhadap Pelaksanaan Program Di PT Wiratama Jaya Perkasa,” J. Fam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2022, doi: 10.24036/jfe.v2i2.50.
  11. A. Mulyadi, “First Responder Emergency Training Dan Perilaku Petugas Satuan Pengamanan Dalam Penanganan Korban Kegawatdaruratan,” J. Appl. Nurs. (Jurnal Keperawatan Ter., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 6, 2018, doi: 10.31290/jkt.v(4)i(1)y(2018).page:6-13.
  12. S. K. Siti Sumartini, Nurwahyuni, “Kedudukan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Modern,” J. Suara Huk., vol. 4, pp. 224–242, 2021.
  13. M. M Husein, “Penegakan Hukum Dan Perlindungan Negara,” J. Ilmu Polit. dan Komun., vol. VII, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2017.
  14. S. S. Erdi Erdi, Surya Perdana, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Melaksanakan Hak Dan Kewajiban Ingkar Notaris Pada Saat Penyidikan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia,” Lega Lata, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 165–166, 2020.
  15. E. Putra, “Menuju Industrial Security Dalam Mewujudkan Tenaga Satpam Profesional, Modern Dan Terpercaya Di Indonesia,” Maleo Law J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–164, 2020.
  16. A. Agustia, “Kepuasan Kerja Satuan Pengamanan (Satpam) Universitas Padjadjaran: Ditinjau Dari Aspek Job Description Index (Jdi),” Personifikasi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 248–253, 2018.
  17. F. Ariani, P. Cendekia, A. K. Puspa, E. Erlangga, and Y. Aprilinda, “Sistem Rekomendasi Metode Simple Additive Weight Untuk Penentuan Personel Pengamanan Vip Direktorat Pamobvit Polda Lampung,” Explor. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 247, 2021, doi: 10.36448/jsit.v12i2.2265.
  18. N. S. P. J. Appludnopsanji, Hari Sutra Disemadi, “Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Berwawasan Pancasila,” Kertha Wicaksana, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 4, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.15.1.2021.1-10.
  19. R. Akbar, D. Asmaul, S. Feni, and W. Trisnadi, “Simulasi Penggunaan Alat Pemadam Api Ringan Terhadap Satuan Pengamanan Perumahan Daan Mogot Simulation of the Use Light Fire Extinguishers of Daan Mogot Housing Security Unit,” J. Abdi Masy. Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 175–180, 2021.
  20. K. R. Aisyah Nurannisa Muhlisa, “Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Visa Izin Tinggal Kunjungan Lewat Batas Waktu (Overstay) Pada Warga Negara Asing,” Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 147, 2020.
  21. S. Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas, 2010.
  22. A. OCTAVIAN, J. WIDJAYANTO, I. N. PUTRA, A. P. SUMARNO, and H. J. R. SARAGIH, “Sishankamrata Development Strategy In Maintaining The Sustainability Of Indonesia’s Strategic Interests,” J. Def. Resour. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 118, 2021.
  23. E. Alistar (Hîrlav), “The Relation Between Law and Morality,” in Research Association For Interdisciplinary Studies, 2019, no. 3, pp. 2–4, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3388103.
  24. J. Oh, “Evolutionary synthesis of human rights and global health: beyond companionship,” J. Glob. Heal. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3–5, 2020, doi: 10.35500/jghs.2020.2.e23.
  25. L. Henkin, The Right of Man Today, 1st ed. Oxon: Routledge, 2019.
  26. I. S. Bahri, Perlindungan Upah Bagi Pekerja Badan Usaha Milik Desa, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Bahasa Rakyat, 2020.
  27. D. G. G. Santosa, “Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Implementasi Dan Permasalahannya,” Ilmu Huk., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 178–191, 2021.
  28. I. Afrita, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia. Bantul: Absolute Media, 2015.
  29. D. R. I. H. Kemal Juniardi, Komariah, “Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Proporsionalitas dalam Perjanjian Kerja antara Pengusaha dan Pekerja di Banjarmasin,” Indones. Law Reform J., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 257, 2021.
  30. A. P. R. P. Banjaransari, “Regulation of The Use of Foreign Workers in Indonesia After The Job Creation Act: Problems and Solutions,” Constitutionale, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 43–58, 2022, doi: 10.25041/constitutionale.v3i1.2558.
  31. N. R. Izzati, “Deregulation in Job Creation Law: The Future of Indonesian Labor Law,” Padjadjaran J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 191–209, 2022, doi: 10.22304/pjih.v9n2.a3.
  32. T. S. D. Hadjon, Philipus M, Argumentasi Hukum, 5th ed. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2011.
  33. J. Wexler, “Fun with reverse ejusdem generis,” Arthropoda Sel., vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2020, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3473314.