Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Criminal Law

Turn on the Living Law: The Construction and Implications of Living Law in Ratification of Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP)
Menghidupkan Living Law: Konstruksi dan Implikasi Living Law dalam Pengesahan Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP)

View Article
  • Musmuliady*,
  • Jubair,
  • Aminuddin Kasim
Musmuliady
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia *
Jubair
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
Aminuddin Kasim
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.798


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 28, 2022
Keywords
  • Living Law,
  • Customary Norms,
  • Criminal Law Reform,
  • RKHUP
How to Cite
Musmuliady, Jubair, & Kasim, A. (2022). Turn on the Living Law: The Construction and Implications of Living Law in Ratification of Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP). Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.798. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.798

Copyright (c) 2022 Musmuliady, Jubair, Aminuddin Kasim (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Legal provisions that live in society are one of the controversial provisions in the ratification of the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP). That is because the law in the community is related to legal values written and unwritten in society. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of culture in RKUHP. This research is normative legal research that puts forward legal issues on the implications of legal arrangements regarding living law in the RKUHP and focuses on using a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the construction of living law in the community (living law) in the RKUHP, which emphasizes that the living law is customary law, is also formulated simultaneously with the regional role in establishing regional regulations based on the substance of local customary law. In addition, the construction of regional rules to accommodate Article 2 of the RKUHP to regulate the importance of customary law raises legal ambiguity, namely regional rules at the provincial or regency/city level that have the authority to regulate them; so that there is no disharmony of customary law arrangements in the formulation of regional regulations as a follow-up to Article 2 RKUHP. Furthermore, the legal implications related to living law arrangements in the RKUHP, namely the lack of clarity in Article 2 of the RKUHP, including the need for regulation at the regional level through regional regulations, have the potential to cause criminalization based on regional principles

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Kemenkumham, “RUU KUHP disahkan Menjadi Undang-undang.” kemenkumham.go.id, Jakarta, p. 1, 2022.
  2. K. H. Edi Setiadi, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  3. W. I. Abdul Hakim, “RUU KUHP sudah memasuki tahap finalisasi.” babel.antaranews.com, 2022.
  4. B. N. A. Muladi, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, 2nd ed. Bandung: Alumni, 1998.
  5. S. Shidarta, “Bernard Arief Sidharta: Dari Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis ke Pembentukan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia,” Undang J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 441–476, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.22437/ujh.3.2.441-476.
  6. M. R. Faisal, “Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP,” Magister Huk. Udayana, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 293, 2021.
  7. Y. A. F. Tongat, Said Noor Prasetyo, Nu’man Aunuh, “Hukum yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional,” Konstitusi, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 159, 2020.
  8. N. S. Putri, “Memikirkan Kembali Unsur ‘Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat’ Dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP Ditinjau Perspektif Asas Legalitas,” Indones. Crim. Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 63, 2021.
  9. C. H. Eka N.A.M. Sihombing, Penelitian Hukum, 1st ed. Malang: Setara Press, 2022.
  10. Hanafi Amrani, Politik Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019.
  11. N. I. S. A. Nasution, “Politik Hukum Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Dalam RKUHP,” Khazanah Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 46, 2021.
  12. B. Budi Priambodo, “Positioning Adat Law in the Indonesia’s Legal System: Historical Discourse and Current Development on Customary Law,” Udayana J. Law Cult., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 140, 2018, doi: 10.24843/ujlc.2018.v02.i02.p02.
  13. A. Ramdan, “Kontroversi Delik Penghinaan Presiden/Wakil Presiden Dalam RKUHP,” Yudisial, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 246, 2020.
  14. M. Čehulić, “Perspectives of Legal Culture,” Rev. Sociol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 257–282, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.5613/rzs.51.2.4.
  15. et. al. Dicky Eko Prasetio, “Policy Evaluation of the Imposition of Restrictions on Emergency Community Activities (PPKM) in East Java,” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021), 2021, pp. 871–878.
  16. B. Suhariyanto, “Problema Penyerapan Adat oleh Pengadilan dan Pengaruhnya bagi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional,” Mimb. Huk. - Fak. Huk. Univ. Gadjah Mada, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 421, 2018, doi: 10.22146/jmh.33227.
  17. A. Rosidi et al., “Perspektif Hukum Positif (Ius Constitutum),” J. Ilm. Rinjani, vol. 10, no. 1, 2022.
  18. B. T. Keebet Von Benda-Beekman, The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism, 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  19. S. I. Pradhani, “Sejarah Hukum Maritim Kerajaan Sriwijaya dan Majapahit dalam Hukum Indonesia Kini,” Lembaran Sej., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 186, 2017, doi: 10.22146/lembaran-sejarah.33542.
  20. U. J. Rosdiana, “Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Tindak Pidana Perzinaan Pada Masyarakat Kutai Adat Lawas,” Bina Mulia Huk., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 55, 2020.
  21. Y. Abiyoso, A. Abdillah, R. M. Wasti, G. Sujatnika, and M. Fakhri, “Adat Institutions In Aceh Government: A Constitutional Perspective Constitutional Perspective,” J. Islam. Law Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020.
  22. F. P. Disantara, “Konsep Pluralisme Hukum Khas Indonesia sebagai Strategi Menghadapi Era Modernisasi Hukum,” Al-Adalah J. Huk. dan Polit. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2021, doi: 10.35673/ajmpi.v6i1.1129.
  23. Bustomi, “The Legality Principle Application in Indonesian Criminal Law System,” Nurani Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 31, 2021.
  24. E. O. S. Hiariej, Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2019.
  25. H. R. Vincentius Patria Setyawan, “Relasi Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana dan Pemikiran Hukum Alam,” Inov. Penelit., vol. 2, no. 12, p. 3814, 2022.
  26. S. Irianto, “Praktik Penelitian Hukum: Perspektif Sosiolegal,” in Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi & Refleksi, Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2013, pp. 1–38.
  27. V. Kristiani, “Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Bagi Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Kajian Dan Implementasi),” ADIL J. Huk., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 143–163, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1449.
  28. A. Redi, Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, 1st ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
  29. B. D. Anggono, Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Penataan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2020.
  30. S. I. Pradhani, “Dynamics of Adat Law Community Recognition : Struggle To Strengthen Legal Capacity,” Mimb. Huk. - Fak. Huk. Univ. Gadjah Mada, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 279–296, 2019.
  31. D. P. Dicky Eko Prasetio, Fradhana Putra Disantara, Nadia Husna Azzahra, “The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law,” Rechtsidee, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4, 2021.
  32. A. Bedner and Y. Arizona, “Adat in Indonesian Land Law: A Promise for the Future or a Dead End?,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 416–434, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670246.
  33. L. T. A. L. Wardhani, M. D. H. Noho, and & A. Natalis, “The adoption of various legal systems in Indonesia: an effort to initiate the prismatic Mixed Legal Systems,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4, 2022.
  34. S. Suhartono, “Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan Dan Solusi Teoritiknya,” DiH J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 201–211, 2019, doi: 10.30996/dih.v15i2.2549.
  35. A. Rifa’i, Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif, 3rd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
  36. D. E. Prasetio, “Inventarisasi Putusan Peradilan Adat Sendi sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Constitutional Culture dalam Negara Hukum Pancasila,” J. Huk. Lex Gen., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 249–273, 2021.
  37. D. Rato, “Realisme Hukum: Peradilan Adat dalam Perspektif Keadilan Sosial,” J. Kaji. Pembaruan Huk., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 285, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.19184/jkph.v1i2.24998.
  38. K. von Benda-Beckmann, “Anachronism, Agency, and the Contextualisation of Adat: Van Vollenhoven’s Analyses in Light of Struggles Over Resources,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 397–415, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670242.
  39. J. C. Thompson, “Law’s Autonomy and Moral Reason,” Laws, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/laws8010006.
  40. R. Asher, “Unresolved Injustice : An Examination of Indigenous Legal Issues in Australia,” Udayana J. Law Cult., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 146–170, 2020.
  41. I. Ardhani, “Indonesia and The Criminalization of Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported Fishing at the Global Level,” Hub. Int., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 165–176, 2020.
  42. R. R. Antasari, “Telaah Terhadap Perkembangan Tipe Tatanan Hukum Di Indonesia Perspektif Pemikiran Nonet-Selznick Menuju Hukum Yang Berkeadilan,” Nurani J. Kaji. Syari’ah dan Masy., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 103–118, 2019, doi: 10.19109/nurani.v19i1.3344.
  43. A. Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum & Teori Peradilan Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Volume 1 Pemahaman Awal, 7th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  44. A. H. Romadhon, I. Harianti, N. Royhana, and M. Agustina, “Dinamika Pranata Pemerintahan Desa Adat Dalam Dimensi Hukum Tata Negara,” J. Huk. Media Bhakti, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–137, 2018, doi: 10.32501/jhmb.v2i2.31.