Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Human Rights

The Reformulation of Abortion Regulations: Study of the Ratio Legis and Ius Constituendum
Reformulasi Peraturan Aborsi: Studi tentang Rasio Legis dan Ius Constituendum

View Article
  • Dinda Fefty Miranda Putri*,
  • Ainul Azizah,
  • Fanny Tannuwijaya
Dinda Fefty Miranda Putri
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia *
Ainul Azizah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Fanny Tannuwijaya
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.799


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 28, 2022
Keywords
  • Abortion,
  • Rape Victims,
  • Principles of Protection for Victims
How to Cite
Putri, D. F. M., Azizah, A., & Tannuwijaya, F. (2022). The Reformulation of Abortion Regulations: Study of the Ratio Legis and Ius Constituendum. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.799. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.799

Copyright (c) 2022 Dinda Fefty Miranda Putri, Ainul Azizah, Fanny Tannuwijaya (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abortion can actually be carried out with various special provisions based on Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health (Health Law) and Government Regulation no. 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health (PP Kespro). This study aims to find out the legal review regarding abortion in relation to the principle of protection for rape victims, as well as to study and formulate an appropriate and appropriate timeframe for carrying out an abortion based on the principle of protection for rape victims. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study confirm that the legal ratio for setting the fetal age limit related to abortion for rape victims does not actually explain the reasons or the urgency why the 6 weeks and 40 (forty) days are calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period formulated by the formulators of laws and regulations and only refers to The principle of protecting victims is currently the main orientation of Indonesian criminal law. In the future, the regulation on the principle of protection for victims related to the fetal age limit related to abortion for victims of rape, namely: it is necessary to emphasize the principle of protection for victims in the Health Law. The recommendation of this research is the need for a revision of the Health Law and PP on Produce as based on WHO provisions and with relevant medical considerations.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. F. P. Disantara, “The Joint Ministerial Decree (SKB) of Islamic Defenders Front (FPI): Quo Vadis The Rule of Law and Human Rights?,” Musamus Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 98–117, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.35724/mularev.v3i2.3572.
  2. K. Kittichaisaree, International Human Rights Law and Diplomacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
  3. B. Bisariyadi, “Menyibak Hak Konstitusional Yang Tersembunyi,” J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 509–534, 2017, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art1.
  4. Rini, “Ketika Abosi Menjadi Pilihan: Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Melakukan Aborsi,” J. IKRAITH-HUMANIORA, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2021.
  5. H. Hasmi, M. H. Kombo, and Y. Tambing, “Abortus Provokatus Di Rsud Abepura Kota Jayapura Provinsi Papua,” Jambura J. Heal. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 53–58, 2020, doi: 10.35971/jjhsr.v2i2.6929.
  6. I. Y. Susilawati, “Kajian Yuridis Aborsi Akibat Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam | Unizar Law Review (ULR),” Unizar Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 76–90, 2020.
  7. R. S. R. Rahmi Ayunda, “KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN TENTANG KETETAPAN HUKUM ABORSI DI INDONESIA DAN CHILI,” J. Supremasi Huk., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191–200, 2021.
  8. D. M. Situmeang, H. Panggabean, and R. T. Simangunsong, “Legalisasi Aborsi Terhadap Korban Perkosaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kesehatan No. 36 Tahun 2009,” J. Impresi Indones., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 701–710, 2022, doi: 10.36418/jii.v1i7.205.
  9. Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Media, 2020.
  10. I. B. W. Dharma, “Legalitas Abortus Provocatus Sebagai Akibat Tindakan Pemerkosaan,” Kertha Wicaksana, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2022, doi: 10.22225/kw.16.1.2022.45-50.
  11. A. Daryanto, “Pengaturan Mengenai Pengecualian Dalam Tindakan Aborsi Ditinjau Dari Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana,” J. Educ. Dev. Inst., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 83, 2020.
  12. Y. S. Lon, “KASUS ABORSI DAN PEMBUANGAN BAYI SEBAGAI KEPRIHATINAN GEREJA DAN IMPERATIF EDUKATIFNYA BAGI DUNIA PENDIDIKAN,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 14, 2020.
  13. L. Deshaini and E. Oktarina, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Aborsi,” Solusi, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 322–335, 2020, doi: 10.36546/solusi.v18i3.303.
  14. K. K. Voges, T. N. Palilingan, and T. F. Sumakul, “Penegakan Hukum Kepada Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Perempuan Yang Dilakukan Secara Online,” Lex Crim., vol. 11, no. 4, p. 3, 2022.
  15. H. Fentiningrum, “Komparasi Aborsi Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syari’Ah Imam Ghazali Dan Hubungannya Dengan Faktor Ekonomi,” Kodifikasia, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 69–88, 2021, doi: 10.21154/kodifikasia.v15i1.2607.
  16. E. Winoto, “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Kegawatdaruratan Medis Yang Timbul Akibat Kegagalan Usaha Aborsi,” Jatiswara, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jatiswara.v34i1.233.
  17. N. Irfani, “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum,” J. Legis. Indones., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 305, 2020, doi: 10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.
  18. K. Prawiranegara, “Implementasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Pada Pemerintahan Kabupaten Dompu,” J. Lex Renaiss., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 591–604, 2021, doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art11.
  19. M. G. dan F. Yusril Ihza Mahendra Sirait, “Aborsi Dikalangan Remaja,” SANKSI (Seminar Nas. Hukum, Sos. dan Ekon., pp. 337–343, 2022.
  20. E. T. P. Mayendri and E. Prihantoro, “Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Melakukan Aborsi oleh Perempuan Usia 20-30 Tahun,” Indones. J. Soc. Responsib., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 11–21, 2020, doi: 10.36782/ijsr.v2i2.38.
  21. R. Darmawan, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Malpraktek Dokter Yang Melakukan Aborsi (Studi Putusan No.288/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn. Njk),” El-Iqthisadi J. Huk. Ekon. Syariah Fak. Syariah dan Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 15, 2020, doi: 10.24252/el-iqthisadi.v2i2.13999.
  22. F. M. Nugroho, H. Wujoso, and W. D. Atmoko, “Hubungan Pengetahuan Kode Etik Kedokteran Tentang Aborsi terhadap Sikap Mahasiswa Kedokteran Terhadap Aborsi,” Smart Soc. Empower. J., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.20961/ssej.v1i1.48648.
  23. I. D. Marder, “Mapping restorative justice and restorative practices in criminal justice in the Republic of Ireland,” Int. J. Law, Crime Justice, vol. 70, no. March, p. 100544, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100544.
  24. S. Sukardi and H. R. Purnama, “Restorative Justice Principles In Law Enforcement And Democracy,” J. Indones. Leg. Stud. JILS, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 155–190, 2022.
  25. L. J. Leonard, “Can Restorative Justice Provide a Better Outcome for Participants and Society than the Courts?,” Laws, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/laws11010014.
  26. V. S. Ariani Hasanah Soejoeti, “Diskusi Keadilan Restoratif dalam Konteks Kekerasan Seksual di Kampus,” Deviance, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 2020.
  27. E. Nurisman, “Risalah Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Pasca Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022,” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–196, 2022.
  28. H. Moseson et al., “Effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion with accompaniment support in Argentina and Nigeria (SAFE): a prospective, observational cohort study and non-inferiority analysis with historical controls,” Lancet Glob. Heal., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. e105–e113, 2022, doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00461-7.
  29. P. Saragi, “An Analysis of Legal Concepts Concerning Abortion Case According to Criminal Code and Law No . 36 of 2009 Concerning Health,” vol. 27, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.47750/cibg.2021.27.03.350.
  30. B. L. Candra Istiningsih Dwi Wahyuni and N. M. Al Qulub, “Informed Consent In Health Services: How Are The Patients’ Rights Protected?,” J. Law Leg. Reform, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 591–604, 2020.
  31. N. R. Wildan Nafis, “Hukum Progresif dan Relevansinya Pada Penalaran Hukum di Indonesia,” El Ahli J. Huk. Kel. Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2020.
  32. S. Rahardjo, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir. Jakarta: Kompas, 2007.
  33. V. BERTHET, “United in Crisis: Abortion Politics in the European Parliamentand Political Groups’Disputes over EU Values,” J. Common Mark. Stud., vol. 60, no. 6, p. 1798, 2022.
  34. G. Tio, Y. Adi, and J. Setiawan, “Pencegahan Pengulangan Kekerasan Seksual Melalui Rehabilitasi Pelaku Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif,” Respublica, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155–178, 2022.
  35. E. Kurnia, S. Aisyah, and E. Puspitasari, “Relationship of Age, Parity, and History of Abortion With the Incidence of Incomplete Abortion at RSUD Dr. HM Rabain Muara Enim 2021,” Sci. Midwifery, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 843–849, 2022.