Rechtsidee

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): December
Criminal Law

Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia: A Prophetic Legal Study: Keadilan Restoratif pada KUHP Baru di Indonesia: Suatu Studi Hukum Profetik

View Article
  • Henny Saida Flora
Henny Saida Flora
Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.836
Categories

Published 2022-12-29

Keywords

  • Criminal Law,
  • Prophetical Law,
  • Criminal Code

How to Cite

Flora, H. S. (2022). Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Code in Indonesia: A Prophetic Legal Study: Keadilan Restoratif pada KUHP Baru di Indonesia: Suatu Studi Hukum Profetik. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.836. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.836
Copyright Notice
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The existence of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (UU KUHP) as the new Criminal Code (KUHP) in Indonesia seeks to apply the legal ideals of Restorative justice is one of the concepts substantively constructed in the newly ratified Criminal Code. This study aims to analyze the existence and implications of restorative justice after ratifying the Draft Criminal Code (RKHUP) as a law. This research is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that the existence of the concept of restorative justice from a prophetic law perspective fulfills the three fundamental values of prophetic law, namely: divinity, humanity, and justice. So, that the application of restorative justice in a prophetic law perspective strengthens the substance of the legal state of Indonesia as a nation-state based on the Godhead. Almighty. The implications of restorative justice after the ratification of the RKUHP became the Criminal Code Law in the perspective of prophetic law; that is, the substance of restorative justice has been facilitated in the Criminal Code Law and is spread across various articles. One of the affirmations in the Criminal Code Law is that punishment must not demean human dignity, which means protecting human dignity is God's commandment and a person who ignores the dignity of fellow human beings is a person who transgresses limits. Thus, who can conclude that the substance of restorative justice facilitated in the Criminal Code Act is relevant to prophetic law.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. E. E. Wati, R. N. Purwokerto, and A. T. Wibowo, “Penerapan Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Dispensasi Nikah,” Econ. Soc. Humanit. J., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 18, 2021.
  2. M. H. Ilham, “Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan,” Verstek, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 215, 2019.
  3. H. Christianto, “Norma Persatuan Sebagai Batasan Perbuatan Pidana Penyebaran Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Internet,” Verit. Justitia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 94–126, 2020, doi: 10.25123/vej.3501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3501
  4. A. M. D. Mappatunru, “The Pure Theory of Law Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pembentukan Hukum Indonesia,” Indones. J. Crim. Law, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136–139, 2020.
  5. J. Hobson, A. Twyman-ghoshal, R. Banwell-moore, and D. P. Ash, “Restorative Justice , Youth Violence , and Policing : A Review of the Evidence,” MDPI, vol. 11, no. 62, pp. 1–20, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040062
  6. D. E. Prasetio, “Inventarisasi Putusan Peradilan Adat Sendi sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Constitutional Culture dalam Negara Hukum Pancasila,” J. Huk. Lex Gen., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 249–273, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i3.34
  7. A. Santoso, “KUHP Baru Jadi UU Pertama di 2023 yang Diteken Jokowi.” news.detik.com, 2023.
  8. N. S. Putri, “Memikirkan Kembali Unsur ‘Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat’ Dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP Ditinjau Perspektif Asas Legalitas,” Indones. Crim. Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 63, 2021.
  9. E. Syahputra, “Restorative Justice dalam Sistem peradilan pidana di Masa Yang Akan Datang,” Lex Lata, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 235, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v3i2.1209
  10. I. M. O. Wijaya, “Restorative Justice dalam Tinjauan Hukum Progresif: Eksistensi dan Implikasi,” Indones. Berdaya, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 710, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022297
  11. M. F. Akbar, “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Masal. Huk., vol. 51, no. 2, p. 200, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208
  12. A. Efendi, D. O. Susanti, and R. I. Tektona, Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia, 2019.
  13. and F. F. L. Efendi, Jonaedi, Ismu Gunadi Widodo, Kamus Istilah Hukum Populer, 1st ed. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
  14. K. Makkulawuzar, A. Ilmar, A. P. Moenta, and H. Halim, “The Existence of Final and Binding Ruling by the Constitutional Court in Constitutional Review,” Law, Policy Glob., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 241–247, 2018.
  15. M. Vooren, I. Rud, I. Cornelisz, C. Van Klaveren, W. Groot, and H. Maassen van den Brink, “The effects of a restorative justice programme (Halt) on educational outcomes and recidivism of young people,” J. Exp. Criminol., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11292-022-09502-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.ecaee61a
  16. R. H. Madu, F. M. Wantu, and L. W. Badu, “The Restitution of Children as Victims of the Crime of Obscenity in the Principles of Restorative Justice,” Estud. Law J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 530–546, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v2i3.14598
  17. G. J. S. and A. V. H. Annemieke Wolthuis, Jacques Claessen, “Dutch developments: restorative justice in legislation and in practice,” Int. J. Restor. Justice, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 119, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/IJRJ/258908912019002001007
  18. V. S. Ariani Hasanah Soejoeti, “Diskusi Keadilan Restoratif dalam Konteks Kekerasan Seksual di Kampus,” Deviance, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 2020.
  19. C. Hanum, “Prospek Keadilan Restoratif dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia,” Veritas, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v7i1.1231
  20. M. Rusydianta, “Reformulating Fraud Crimes Under Article 378 Of The Criminal Code Based On Restorative Justice Values,” Prophet. Law, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 221, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol3.iss2.art6
  21. S. Ramadhani, “Peran Kejaksaan Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Kejahatan,” Huk. Progresif, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 78, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v16i1.1898
  22. Y. A. Triputra, “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai HAM Global Ke dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia yang Berlandaskan Pancasila,” J. Huk. IUS QUIA IUSTUM, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 279–300, 2017, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art6
  23. A. Suadi, Filsafat Hukum Refleksi Filsafat Pancasila. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2019.
  24. F. P. Disantara, “Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat dalam Paradoks Etika dan Hukum,” J. LITIGASI, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 205–229, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4211
  25. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, N. H. Azzahra, and D. Perwitasari, “Strategi Pluralisme Hukum Peradilan Adat Sendi dalam Era Modernisasi Hukum,” rechtsidee, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9, 2021.
  26. D. McQuoid-Mason, “Could traditional dispute resolution mechanisms be the solution toreducing the volume of litigation in post-colonial developing countries– particularly in Africa?,” Oñati Socio-Legal Ser., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 591, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1145
  27. Z. A. Senen, “Rekonseptulisasi Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Dan Korban Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Berbasis Restorative Justice,” Lex Renaissan, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 266–269, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss2.art4
  28. E. all. Absori, Paradigma Hukum Profetik: Ragam Paradigma Menuju Hukum Berketuhanan, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: CV Genta Fisa Utama, 2018.
  29. M. Erwin, “Reconstruction the Paradigm of Law and Justice on the Regulation of Right to Living Space of the Orang Rimba Tribe in Bukit Duabelas, Jambi Province,” Sriwij. Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 56, 2018, doi: 10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss1.110.pp56-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss1.110.pp56-68
  30. M. A. Safa’at, Dinamika Negara dan Islam dalam Perkembangan Hukum dan Politik di Indonesia, 1st ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2018.
  31. Ghunarsa Sujatnika, “Pengaruh Konstitusi Berketuhanan Dalam Praktik Ketatanegaraan (Perbandingan Antara Indonesia Dengan Berbagai Negara),” Huk. dan Pembang., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1689–1699, 2017, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no4.1802
  32. N. R. Aditya, “Sudah Disahkan, RKUHP Dikeluarkan dari Prolegnas Prioritas 2023.” nasional.kompas.com, 2023.
  33. E. O. S. Hiariej, Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2019.
  34. Ishaq, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, 5th ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2018.
  35. Rohmatul, “Construction Of Islamic Law And Customary Law In Javanese Tondano Society,” UNTAG Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2020.
  36. K. von Benda-Beckmann, “Anachronism, Agency, and the Contextualisation of Adat: Van Vollenhoven’s Analyses in Light of Struggles Over Resources,” Asia Pacific J. Anthropol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 397–415, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14442213.2019.1670242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670242
  37. M. Čehulić, “Perspectives of Legal Culture,” Rev. Sociol., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 257–282, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.5613/rzs.51.2.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.51.2.4
  38. A. T. DA, “Sekilas Pasal Zina dari KUHP hingga RKUHP.” www.hukumonline.com, 2021.
  39. M. Yasin, “Penjelasan Kembali tentang Pasal Zina dalam KUHP.” www.hukumonline.com, 2022.
  40. N. A. Asep Saepudin Jahar, Raju Moh Hazmi, “Construction of Legal Justice, Certainty, and Benefits in the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018,” Cita Huk., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 162, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i1.11583
  41. D. E. Prasetio, F. P. Disantara, N. H. Azzahra, and D. Perwitasari, “The Legal Pluralism Strategy of Sendi Traditional Court in the Era of Modernization Law,” Rechtsidee, vol. 8, pp. 1–14, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.702
  42. R. Sugiharto, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Sekilas Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Beberapa Negara, 1st ed. Semarang: UNISSULA Press, 2020.
  43. C. T. Lesmana, “Implementasi Mediasi Penal Dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Studi Kasus Pada Satreskrim Polres Sukabumi Kota,” Rechten, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 30, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i2.57
  44. H. Widodo and F. P. Disantara, “Problematik Kepastian Hukum Darurat Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19,” J. Suara Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 197, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p197-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p197-226
  45. A. Sahbani, “Guru Besar Ini Jelaskan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam RKUHP.” www.hukumonline.com, 2021.
  46. A. Ramdan, “Kontroversi Delik Penghinaan Presiden/Wakil Presiden Dalam RKUHP,” Yudisial, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 246, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v13i2.421
  47. Suyanto, Hukum Acara Pidana. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2018.
  48. H. Thahir, Ijtihad Maqasidi: Rekonstruksi Hukum Islam Berbasis Interkoneksitas, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2015.