Rechtsidee
Vol 10 No 2 (2022): December
Business Law

The Communal Dimension of Intellectual Property Rights: An Integrative Legal Perspective on the Future of Geographical Indications
Dimensi Komunal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Perspektif Hukum Integratif Terkait Masa Depan Indikasi Geografis

View Article
  • Melantik Rompegading*,
  • Asmah
Melantik Rompegading
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading, Indonesia *
Asmah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.844


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 15, 2022
Keywords
  • Intellectual Property Rights,
  • Integrative Law,
  • Geographical Indications,
  • Communal
How to Cite
Rompegading, M., & Asmah. (2022). The Communal Dimension of Intellectual Property Rights: An Integrative Legal Perspective on the Future of Geographical Indications. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.844. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.844

Copyright (c) 2022 Melantik Rompegading, Asmah (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the communal dimensions of geographical indication intellectual property rights with an integrative legal perspective. This research is a normative legal research. The results of the study confirm that the character of geographic indication rights which have a communal basis is actually relevant to the legal character of the Indonesian people who view intellectual property as joint property and can be used jointly. Therefore, the character of geographical indication rights that have a communal basis in the future can be regulated through legal instruments regarding Traditional Cultural Expressions which also contain provisions regarding geographic indication rights. This actually requires the role of the state as a trigger for the birth of a conducive economic climate by optimizing intellectual property in the form of geographical indications. Future arrangements for geographic indication rights in an integrative legal perspective can be carried out by optimizing the role of the government (bureaucracy) as a social changer. The role of the bureaucracy is based on laws and policies made by the central government and local governments. It is necessary to provide incentives for communities or legal entities that have an orientation to optimize geographic indications. The existence of incentives from the government should also be optimized in the realm of local government so that people are motivated to optimize geographical indications which can be used as a means to improve the economic level of the community.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. J. J. Biser, “Locke Versus Hobbes: Political Economy of Property Rights,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2020.
  2. D. Handoko, Hukum Positif Mengenai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia Jilid II, 1st ed. Pekanbaru: HAWA dan AHWA, 2015.
  3. D. Sulistianingsih and A. Khomsa Kinanti, “Hak Karya Cipta Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual,” KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 197–206, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1077.
  4. R. Spano, “The future of the European Court of human rights-subsidiarity, process-based review and the rule of law,” Hum. Rights Law Rev., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 473–494, 2018, doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngy015.
  5. N. Katagiri, “Why international law and norms do little in preventing non-state cyber attacks,” J. Cybersecurity, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1093/cybsec/tyab009.
  6. M. R. Aridhayandi, “Peran Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pelaksanaan Pemerintahan Yang Baik (Good Governance) Dibidang Pembinaan Dan Pengawasan Indikasi Geografis,” J. Huk. Pembang., vol. 48, no. 4, p. 883, 2018, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol48.no4.1807.
  7. D. A. I. Deslaely Putranti, “Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis oleh Masyarakat Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Pasca Sertifikasi di Yogyakarta,” Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 397, 2021.
  8. S. Balqis Siagian, Saidin, Suhaidi, “Pelindungan Hukum Atas Potensi Indikasi Geografis Di Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara,” Iuris Stud., vol. 2, no. 8, p. 655, 2021.
  9. K. R. Purnama Hadi Kusuma, “Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional dan Indikasi Geografis: Suatu Kekayaan Intelektual Dengan Kepemilikan Komunal,” Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 110, 2022.
  10. A. Efendi, D. O. Susanti, and R. I. Tektona, Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia, 2019.
  11. M. Miharja, Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: CV Cendekia Press, 2021.
  12. I Kadek Sukadana, G. Ayu, and P. Nia, “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Geguritan Bali Di Indonesia,” J. Media Komun., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 108–120, 2021.
  13. Y. A. Triputra, “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai HAM Global Ke dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia yang Berlandaskan Pancasila,” J. Huk. IUS QUIA IUSTUM, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 279–300, 2017, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art6.
  14. A. Ismayawati, “Pancasila sebagai Dasar Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia,” Yudisia, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017.
  15. J. M. Martinez, “Law versus Ethics,” Adm. Soc., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 690–722, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1177/009539979802900609.
  16. J. B. Murphy, Aquinas and Modern Law. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis, 2017.
  17. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, “Sejarah Perkembangan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual (KI).” KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAM RI DIREKTORAT JENDERAL IMIGRASI.
  18. M. F. Guillén, “Symbolic unity, dynastic continuity, and countervailing power: Monarchies, republics, and the economy,” Soc. Forces, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 607–648, 2018, doi: 10.1093/sf/soy037.
  19. Y. M. Yulianty Jacob, I. A. Tungga, and U. L. Peku Wali, “Intervention of Intellectual Property Rights on Household Industry Productivity,” J. Din. Huk., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 74, 2019, doi: 10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.1.2478.
  20. D. Westberg, “The Relation between Positive and Natural Law in Aquinas,” J. Law Relig., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1, 1994, doi: 10.2307/1051622.
  21. H. Widodo and F. P. Disantara, “Problematik Kepastian Hukum Darurat Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19,” J. Suara Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 197, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p197-226.
  22. S. Syaripuddin, “Maslahat as Considerations of Islamic Law in View Imam Malik,” Samarah J. Huk. Kel. dan Huk. Islam Vol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2020.
  23. G. Bianco and Some, “Some Remarks on the Development and Consolidation of State Immunity in International Law,” STALS Res. Pap., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–664, 2018.
  24. C. M. I. Susilowati, “The Philosophy Of Sentencing In Indonesia Based On Dignified Justice,” Int. J. Business, Econ. Law, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 174, 2020.
  25. M. A. Mukhlishin, Menyelamatkan Potensi Daerah Melalui Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis. smartlegal.id, 2020.
  26. Z. Arifin and M. Iqbal, “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK YANG TERDAFTAR,” J. Ius Const., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 47, May 2020, doi: 10.26623/jic.v5i1.2117.
  27. E. V. Setyoningsih, “Implementasi Ratifikasi Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Right (Trips Agremeent) terhadap Politik Hukum di Indonesia,” J. Penegakan Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–129, 2021, doi: 10.18196/jphk.v2i2.11749.
  28. Z. Muhammad Al Ikhwan Bintarto, Sayang Bidul, “Analysis of Economic Analysis of Law Principle In Purchase Fuel By Application (Study of MyPertamina),” J. Huk. Bisnis Bonum Commune, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 203–210, 2022.
  29. P. A. S. Wesna, “Urgency of TRIPs Waiver in Patent Legal Protection against Covid 19 Vaccine,” Udayana Master Law J., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 692, 2021, doi: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p03.
  30. G. P. and E. İ. Gönenç Gürkaynak, Esq., “Business Judgment Rule: a Legal Theory or a Real Protection for the Board Members in Turkey?,” vol. 23, no. 1. pp. 77–100, 2020.
  31. F. Hukum and U. Airlangga, “Reconciling the Global Public Health Interest with Intellectual Property Protection Through the Waiver of Certain Provisions of the WTO TRIPS Agreement,” Yuridika, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 633–672, 2022, doi: 10.20473/ydk.v37i3.37237.
  32. R. Muhammad and A. Ilyasa, “The Impact Of Trips Agreement On The Development Of Intellectual Property Laws In Indonesia,” Indones. Priv. Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–98, 2022, doi: 10.2504/iplr.v3i2.2579.
  33. R. F. Syafrinaldi and D. Hardiago, “Trips Agreement Dan Standarisasi Hukum Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Industri Di Indonesia,” UIR Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2021, doi: 10.25299/uirlrev.2021.vol5(1).6992.
  34. F. Fathoni, “Paradigma Hukum Berkeadilan Dalam Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal,” J. Cita Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.15408/jch.v1i2.1469.
  35. B. Jonathan, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Lagu Daerah yang Tidak Diketahui Penciptanya,” Univ. Bengkulu Law J., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 175, 2019.
  36. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, An Introduction to Indonesian Law, 1st ed. Malang: Setara Press, 2011.
  37. K. Warman, S. Isra, and H. Tegnan, “Enhancing legal pluralism: The role of adat and Islamic laws within the Indonesian legal system,” J. Leg. Ethical Regul. Issues, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2018.
  38. D. G. Ma’mun Murod Al-Barbasy, Retnowati WD. Tuti, “Reformasi Sistem Politik Untuk Keberhasilan Reformasi Birokrasi,” Independen, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 76, 2020.
  39. P. Kuruk, Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources, Customary Law and Intellectual Property: A Global Primer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
  40. D. E. Mayasari, “Protection of Geographical Indications as a Form of Consumer Rights Protection,” Yuridika, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 41, 2020, doi: 10.20473/ydk.v35i1.13990.
  41. Humas UI, “Bangga Buatan Indonesia dengan Indikasi Geografis Oleh Angga Priancha, S.H., LL.M.” law.ui.ac.id, 2021.
  42. E. Science, “Could Kuansing ’ s Pangasius Kunyit Be Protected by Geographical Indication ? Could Kuansing ’ s Pangasius Kunyit Be Protected by Geographical Indication ?,” 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1118/1/012081.
  43. R. J. A. Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun and T. N. A. Narwadan, “Legal Implications of Foreign Investment Relating to Technology Transfer in the Patent Regime,” SASI, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 92, 2022.
  44. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, “Kesadaran Masyarakat tentang Kekuatan Produk Lokal untuk Mengglobal Masih Rendah.” www.dgip.go.id, 2020.
  45. K. Fu, “Institutionalizing Social Norms and Legal Culture: Social Dynamics under Legal Awareness Policy in Contemporary China,” Beijing Law Rev., vol. 12, no. 03, pp. 993–1015, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.4236/blr.2021.123051.
  46. R. Atmasasmita, Teori hukum integratif rekonstruksi terhadap teori hukum pembangunan dan teori hukum progresif. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2012.
  47. R. Atmasasmita, “Memahami Teori Hukum Integratif,” Legalitas, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2012.
  48. S. Sayuti, “Arah Kebijakan Pembentukan Hukum Kedepan (Pendekatan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Teori Hukum Progresif, dan Teori Hukum Integratif),” Al Risal., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 11–22, 2018.