Vol 11 No 1 (2023): June
Administrative Law

Illegal Ministerial Circulars in Indonesia: Implications for Legitimacy
Surat Edaran Menteri yang Tidak Sah di Indonesia: Implikasi bagi Legitimasi

Ari Gunawan
Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia *
Bio
Wasis Susetio
Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
Bio
Markoni Markoni
Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
Bio
Achmad Edi Subiyanto
Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
Bio

(*) Corresponding Author


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 1, 2023
Keywords
  • normative research,
  • ministerial circular letters,
  • Indonesia,
  • implications
How to Cite
Gunawan, A., Susetio, W., Markoni, M., & Subiyanto, A. E. (2023). Illegal Ministerial Circulars in Indonesia: Implications for Legitimacy. Rechtsidee, 11(1), 10.21070/jihr.v12i0.972. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i0.972
 

Abstract

This normative research aimed to examine the extent of ministerial circular letters in Indonesia and whether a particular circular letter violates the Law Number 17 of 2014. Through a qualitative literature review and legal analysis, the study found that Minister of Finance Circular Letter Number S-841/Mk.02/2014 does not fall under the category of legislative rules and lacks external application, thus rendering it illegal. The study suggests that ministerial circular letters must adhere to the law, philosophy, and social considerations to be considered legitimate. The findings have implications for the proper implementation and interpretation of ministerial circular letters in Indonesia.

Highlights:

  1. Ministerial circular letters in Indonesia must comply with the law, philosophical principles, and social considerations to be considered legitimate.
  2. Ministerial circular letters are not regulations that apply to the general public, but only to ministries or institutions.
  3. Ministerial circular letters that contradict higher laws are considered illegal.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Z. Koto, "Catatan dalam RUU KUHP Buku Kesatu Terkait Tugas," Jurnal Hukum dan Kriminologi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 11-17, Oct. 2022.
  2. J.A. Latuny, M.J. Saptenno, and V.J. Sedubun, "Implementasi Hak Mengajukan Permohonan Pengujian Peraturan Perundangan di Bawah Undang-Undang oleh Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat," Tatohi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 728-738, 2021, doi: 10.47268/tatohi.v1i7.673.
  3. P. Brand, "Local Custom in the Early Common Law," in Law, Laity and Solidarities, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2020, pp. 150-159.
  4. E.O. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
  5. Y.A. Hilman, "Dinamika Sosial Politik Terhadap Eksistensi Organisasi Resimen Mahasiswa (Studi Terhadap Eksistensi Organisasi Resimen Mahasiswa Mahasurya, Koordinasi Wilayah II Malang)," Master's thesis, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia, 2010.
  6. R. Fitri, "Hukum Agraria Bidang Pertanahan Setelah Otonomi Daerah," Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 490-507, 2018.
  7. G. Ginsburgs, "In Search of a Russian Brand of International Law," Review of Central and East European Law, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 355-377, 1998.