Rechtsidee
Vol 11 No 1 (2023): June
Business Law

Enhancing Legal Protection for Digital Transactions: Addressing Fraudulent QRIS System in Indonesia
Meningkatkan Perlindungan Hukum dalam Transaksi Digital: Mengatasi Sistem QRIS Palsu di Indonesia

View Article
  • Mas Rara Tri Retno Herryani*
Mas Rara Tri Retno Herryani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kadiri, Kediri, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i1.990


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published June 30, 2023
Keywords
  • Legal protection,
  • digital transactions,
  • fraudulent QRIS,
  • consumer protection,
  • law enforcement capacity
How to Cite
Herryani, M. R. T. R. (2023). Enhancing Legal Protection for Digital Transactions: Addressing Fraudulent QRIS System in Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 11(1), 10.21070/jihr.v12i1.990. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i1.990

Copyright (c) 2023 Mas Rara Tri Retno Herryani (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study examined the legal safeguards necessary to combat fraudulent QRIS systems in digital transactions, focusing on the imperative need to protect consumers who are often more vulnerable than business entities in the digital transaction process. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study utilized a legislative approach and concept analysis to deliver its findings. The study revealed that preventive legal protection, manifesting as increased public awareness and understanding of the QRIS system, its use, and associated criminal potentials, is essential. Repressive legal protection should be implemented by enhancing the capacity and infrastructure of law enforcement agencies. In cases of internal issues with the QRIS system, the liability of the system's creator or issuer must be clearly defined. The electronic system's execution can be managed by the electronic system provider or delegated to e-business agent operators, underlined by good faith, transparency, accountability, fairness, and prudence. This research underscores the importance of extensive public socialization and training on the use and risks of the QRIS system, providing implications for bolstering consumer protection laws, enhancing law enforcement capacity and infrastructure, and refining electronic transaction regulations in Indonesia.

Highlights:

  • The vulnerability of consumers in digital transactions necessitates robust legal safeguards, particularly regarding the use of the QRIS system.
  • Both preventive (educational) and repressive (enforcement) legal protections are vital to combat fraudulent digital transactions and enhance consumer confidence.
  • Enhancing law enforcement capabilities and infrastructure, as well as clearly defining the liability of QRIS system issuers, is imperative for maintaining the integrity of digital transactions.

Keywords: Legal protection, digital transactions, fraudulent QRIS, consumer protection, law enforcement capacity.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. S. K. Fakunmoju, O. Banmore, A. Gbadamosi, and O. I. Okunbanjo, “Effect of Cryptocurrency Trading and Monetary Corrupt Practices on Nigerian Economic Performance,” Binus Bus. Rev., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2022, doi: 10.21512/bbr.v13i1.7305.
  2. Krismiyarsi, “Proven Criminal Action Of Spreading Hoax News Through Social Media Regarding Covid-19,” Untag Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 58, 2021, doi: 10.5812/iji.102184.2.
  3. I. C. P. Siti Mahfuzah, “Perkembangan Transaksi E-Commerce Berdasarkan pada Metode Pembayaran, Kategori Produk dan Kelompok Usia di Kalimantan Selatan,” J. Ilmu Ekon. dan Pembang., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 296, 2022.
  4. S. K. Pandey, “A Study on Digital Payments System & Consumer Perception: An Empirical Survey,” J. Posit. Sch. Psychol., vol. 2022, no. 3, pp. 10121–10131, 2022.
  5. I. W. G. Wiryawan, “Urgensi Perlindungan Kurir Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Dengan Sistem COD (Cash On Delivery),” J. Anal. Huk., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 188–202, 2021.
  6. M. N. K. Fauzi and D. L. Kusworo, “Legal Effectivity: Transisi Electronic Commerce Pada Era Pandemi Terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019,” Res Judicata, pp. 1–22, 2021.
  7. K. Hidayag and A. Witasari, “Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual-Beli Secara Online (E-Commerce),” in Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa UNISSULA, 2022, pp. 275–291.
  8. D. Afriyanti, “Dampak Penggunaan Qris Pada Umkm Di Kota Pekanbaru Dalam Rangka Mendorong Perkembangan Ekonomi Digital,” Khazanah Ulum Perbank. Syariah, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2022.
  9. Y. D. Novita and B. Santoso, “Urgensi Pembaharuan Regulasi Perlindungan Konsumen di Era Bisnis Digital,” J. Pembang. Huk. Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–58, 2021.
  10. E. B. Dewina Nurul Aini Kosasih, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pada Transaksi Digital Aset Kripto Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Dewina,” Padjadjaran Law Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3, 2022.
  11. V. S. Purborini, “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen pada Transaksi Jual Beli Jasa Desain Melalui Shopee,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3619–3623, 2023.
  12. I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
  13. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016.
  14. A. Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
  15. M. Radho and N. I. Lestari, “Students’ Interest in Using the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard Payment System for Vocational Education Program Students Serang Raya University,” J. Keuang. dan Perbank., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2022, doi: 10.30656/jkk.v2i1.5846.
  16. I. Liswanty, W. Dari, R. Hasanah, and N. M. Saragih, “Perkembangan Pembayaran Digital : Meningkatkan Strategi Intensi Penggunaan QRIS Pada Generasi Millenial di Kota Medan,” Accumulated J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 2023.
  17. N. I. Putri, Z. Munawar, and R. Komalasari, “Minat Penggunaan QRIS Sebagai Alat Pembayaran Pasca Pandemi,” Pros. SISFOTEK, pp. 155–160, 2022.
  18. S. Hidayati et al., “Sosialisasi Sistem Pembayaran Elektronik (QRIS) dan Pecahan Uang Kertas Tahun Emisi (TE) 2022 Kepada Masyarakat Desa Lampeunurut,” J. Pengabdi. Aceh, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2023.
  19. H. A. Gilang Rizaldi, “Studi Kualitatif Penggunaan QRIS (Quick Respond Indonesian Standard) dalam Pemungutan ZIS (Zakat, Infaq, dan Shadaqah) (Studi Empiris pada Masjid-Masjid di Kota Padang),” Eksplor. Akunt., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 115–126, 2023.
  20. W. Seputri and M. Yafiz, “QRIS sebagai Alat Transaksi Digital Generasi Z: Analisis Faktor,” Adzkiya J. Huk. dan Ekon. Syariah, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 139, 2022.
  21. M. K. Niken Widowati, “Adopsi Pembayaran Digital Qris Pada Umkm Berdasarkan Technology Acceptance Model,” J. Dev. Econ. Soc. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 325–347, 2022.
  22. P. Ramadani Silalahi, K. Tambunan, and T. Ramadhany Batubara, “Dampak Penggunaan QRIS Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Sebagai Alat Transaksi,” J. Ilm. Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 122–128, 2022.
  23. D. I. Saibil, F. Sodik, and A. A. Mardiah, “Factors Affecting the Intention of Using Qris in Sharia Mobile Banking Model Modification Of Utaut 2),” Nisbah, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 76–92, 2022.
  24. E. Sholihah and R. Nurhapsari, “Percepatan Implementasi Digital Payment Pada UMKM : Intensi Pengguna QRIS Berdasarkan Technology Acceptance Model,” Nominal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023.
  25. S. Subekti, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pada Jual Beli Rumah Deret Dengan Sistem Pre Project Selling Berdasarkan Ppjb,” Lex J., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3, 2020.
  26. B. Effendi, “Pengawasan Dan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Bisnis Digital (E-Commerce) Oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Praktek Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat,” Syiah Kuala Law J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21–32, 2020, doi: 10.24815/sklj.v4i1.16228.
  27. K. Benuf, S. Mahmudah, and E. A. Priyono, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Konsumen Financial Technology Di Indonesia,” Refleks. Huk. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 2019, doi: 10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160.
  28. A. Yetno, “Penyelesaian Kasus Hukum Pada Transaksi Elektronik Atau E-Commerce Bagi Konsumen di Era Digital di Indonesia,” Satya Dharma, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 172, 2022.
  29. G. S. Saleh and G. S. Saleh, “Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Online Store Fraud in Indonesia,” J. Huk. dan Peradil., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 151, 2022, doi: 10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.151-175.
  30. S. Puspasari, “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Investor pada Transaksi Aset Kripto dalam Bursa Berjangka Komoditi,” Jurist-Diction, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 303, 2020, doi: 10.20473/jd.v3i1.17638.
  31. S. Susilawati, R. Falefi, and A. Purwoko, “Impact of COVID-19’s Pandemic on the Economy of Indonesia,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Inst. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1147–1156, 2020, doi: 10.33258/birci.v3i2.954.
  32. L. Putu and Y. Karista, “Online Fraud Law in Indonesia : Enforcement Challenges and Future Solutions,” in International Conference Towards Humanity Justice for Law Enforcement and Dispute Settlement, 2022, pp. 54–64.
  33. P. Ameliani, H. Iskandar, and D. J. Wardana, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Terhadap Produk Kosmetik yang Tidak Terdaftar BPOM,” AL-MANHAJ J. Huk. dan Pranata Sos. Islam, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 653–660, 2022, doi: 10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.2062.
  34. M. Mohd Ali and N. Farhana Mohd Zaharon, “Phishing as Cyber Fraud: The Implications and Governance,” Hong Kong J. Soc. Sci., vol. 57, no. 1, p. 123, 2021.
  35. H. Veno, C. Ali Firman, D. Ravena, and A. Mulyana, “Criminal Response Formulation Policy Distribution News (Hoax) through Social Media,” J. La Soc., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 13–21, 2021, doi: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v2i6.495.
  36. A. Muhammad Aswin Anas, A. Yunus, M. M. Athallariq Gio, and N. Wulandari, “Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyebaran Berita Bohong tentang Vaksinasi,” Amanna Gappa, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 2021, 2021.
  37. A. Asnawi, “Kesiapan Indonesia Membangun Ekonomi Digital Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” J. Ilm. Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, 2022.
  38. Y. W. Riyadi Putra, F. Nur Styaningsih, and W. H. Herviana, “Analisis Perkembangan Transportasi Online di Indonesia di Era 4.0 Dengan Metode Penelitian Deskriptif,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 162–170, 2022, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v4i1.389.
  39. Yuliana, “Inovasi Bisnis Digital di tengah Pandemi COVID-19,” JAMI J. Ahli Muda Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 60–71, 2021, doi: 10.46510/jami.v2i2.79.
  40. A. Kemajuan et al., “Legal Protection for Consumers in Reviewing a Product on Social Media from the Offense of Defamation,” vol. 9, pp. 1–10, 2021.
  41. S. L. Poernomo, “Consumer Protection and Legal Effort Related to the Exoneration Clause in Buy-Buying Transactions,” Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 93–97, 2022.
  42. A. Dermawan, E. Saputra, and J. E. Hutagalung, “Peran Masyarakat Dalam Menaati Hukum Dan Mendukung Perkembangan Teknologi Komputer Dalam Bisnis Digital,” Community Dev. J. J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 569–573, 2022, doi: 10.31004/cdj.v2i3.2542.
  43. Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Peradaban, 2007.