Vol 11 No 2 (2023): December
Business Law

Trademark Infringement: An Analysis of the Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru Case and Its Global Implications
Pelanggaran Merek Dagang: Analisis Kasus Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru dan Implikasi Globalnya

Goesman Goesman
Universitas Esa Unggul, *
Markoni Markoni
Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 8, 2023
Keywords
  • Trademark Dispute,
  • Gudang Garam,
  • Gudang Baru,
  • Legal Implications,
  • Trademark Registration
How to Cite
Goesman, G., & Markoni, M. (2023). Trademark Infringement: An Analysis of the Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru Case and Its Global Implications. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.992
 

Abstract

This study conducts a qualitative analysis of the trademark dispute between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru concerning brand names and imagery on products, employing a case study method alongside normative legal and conceptual approaches. The research delves into the judges' legal considerations and the trademark rights arrangement, focusing on Gudang Garam, a renowned brand. The results establish that Gudang Baru violated the 2016 trademark registration provisions (Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law N 20 and Article 18 Paragraph (3) of Ministerial Regulation No. 67), prompting the Intellectual Property Office to reject all applications. This case underlines the importance of respecting well-established brands and legal implications for trademark registrations, informing future practices in the field.
Highlights:

  • Violation of trademark registration provisions by Gudang Baru.
  • Enforcement of the trademark rights of well-known brand Gudang Garam.
  • Legal implications influencing future trademark registration practices.

Keywords: Trademark Dispute, Gudang Garam, Gudang Baru, Trademark Registration, Legal Implications.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. R. Padika, "Sanksi Dagangan Unilateral di Bawah Sistem," Supremasi, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 20, 2009.
  2. V. H. Khotimah and R. Apriani, "Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Pelanggaran Hak Merek Berupa Pemboncengan Reputasi (Passing Off) Merek Terkenal Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis," Jurnal Ilmiah Wa, 2022.
  3. N. Dewi and T. Baskoro, "Kasus Sengketa Merek Prada S.a Dengan Pt. Manggala Putra Perkasa Dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional," Jurnal Ius Constituendum, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. 1, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i1.1531
  4. W. Dianggoro, "Pembaharuan Dagang Indonesia," Ekonomika, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022.
  5. R. F. Widiantoro, "Pendaftaran Merk Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum," Lex Renaissance, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss2.art14
  6. P. Mahadewi and S. Mh, "Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Hakim pada Kasus Pemalsuan Merk Dagang," Ratu Adi, vol. 3, no. 2, Art. 2, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unsa.ac.id/index.php/ratuadil/article/view/36
  7. A. Betlehn and P. O. Samosir, "Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Industri UMKM di Indonesia," Law and Justice, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. 1, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v3i1.6080
  8. D. Denny, Y. P. Liegestu, N. Novika, and A. Patros, "Penyelesaian Sengketa Merk di Indonesia: Studi Putusan," Sapientia Et Virtus, vol. 7, no. 2, Art. 2, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.377
  9. P. Simatupang and S. K. Dermoredjo, "Produksi Domestik Bruto, Harga dan Kemiskinan: Hipotesis 'Trickle Down' Dikaji Ulang," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, vol. 51, pp. 291–324, 2003.