Trademark Infringement: An Analysis of the Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru Case and Its Global Implications Pelanggaran Merek Dagang: Analisis Kasus Gudang Garam versus Gudang Baru dan Implikasi Globalnya
- Trademark Dispute,
- Gudang Garam,
- Gudang Baru,
- Legal Implications,
- Trademark Registration
Copyright (c) 2023 Goesman Goesman, Markoni Markoni (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study conducts a qualitative analysis of the trademark dispute between Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru concerning brand names and imagery on products, employing a case study method alongside normative legal and conceptual approaches. The research delves into the judges' legal considerations and the trademark rights arrangement, focusing on Gudang Garam, a renowned brand. The results establish that Gudang Baru violated the 2016 trademark registration provisions (Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law N 20 and Article 18 Paragraph (3) of Ministerial Regulation No. 67), prompting the Intellectual Property Office to reject all applications. This case underlines the importance of respecting well-established brands and legal implications for trademark registrations, informing future practices in the field.
Highlights:
- Violation of trademark registration provisions by Gudang Baru.
- Enforcement of the trademark rights of well-known brand Gudang Garam.
- Legal implications influencing future trademark registration practices.
Keywords: Trademark Dispute, Gudang Garam, Gudang Baru, Trademark Registration, Legal Implications.
Downloads
Metrics
References
- R. Padika, "Sanksi Dagangan Unilateral di Bawah Sistem," Supremasi, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 20, 2009.
- V. H. Khotimah and R. Apriani, "Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Pelanggaran Hak Merek Berupa Pemboncengan Reputasi (Passing Off) Merek Terkenal Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis," Jurnal Ilmiah Wa, 2022.
- N. Dewi and T. Baskoro, "Kasus Sengketa Merek Prada S.a Dengan Pt. Manggala Putra Perkasa Dalam Hukum Perdata Internasional," Jurnal Ius Constituendum, vol. 4, no. 1, Art. 1, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i1.1531
- W. Dianggoro, "Pembaharuan Dagang Indonesia," Ekonomika, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022.
- R. F. Widiantoro, "Pendaftaran Merk Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Hukum," Lex Renaissance, vol. 7, no. 2, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss2.art14
- P. Mahadewi and S. Mh, "Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Hakim pada Kasus Pemalsuan Merk Dagang," Ratu Adi, vol. 3, no. 2, Art. 2, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unsa.ac.id/index.php/ratuadil/article/view/36
- A. Betlehn and P. O. Samosir, "Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Industri UMKM di Indonesia," Law and Justice, vol. 3, no. 1, Art. 1, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v3i1.6080
- D. Denny, Y. P. Liegestu, N. Novika, and A. Patros, "Penyelesaian Sengketa Merk di Indonesia: Studi Putusan," Sapientia Et Virtus, vol. 7, no. 2, Art. 2, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.377
- P. Simatupang and S. K. Dermoredjo, "Produksi Domestik Bruto, Harga dan Kemiskinan: Hipotesis 'Trickle Down' Dikaji Ulang," Economics and Finance in Indonesia, vol. 51, pp. 291–324, 2003.