Rechtsidee
Vol 11 No 2 (2023): December
Cyber Law

Vicarious Liability in Personal Data Protection
Vicarious Liability dalam Perlindungan Data Pribadi

View Article
  • Zulian Claudia*,
  • Ariawan Gunadi
Zulian Claudia
Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia *
Ariawan Gunadi
Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.995


Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published December 22, 2023
Keywords
  • Vicarious Liability,
  • Personal Data Protection,
  • Legal Responsibility,
  • Compensation,
  • Normative-Juridical Analysis
How to Cite
Claudia, Z., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Vicarious Liability in Personal Data Protection. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 10.21070/jihr.v12i2.995. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.995

Copyright (c) 2023 Zulian Claudia, Ariawan Gunadi (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study explores the legal responsibility and ideal concepts in compensating victims of personal data misuse, focusing on the ambiguous regulations within Indonesia's Personal Data Protection Act (UU PDP). The research, conducted through a normative-juridical approach employing conceptual and legislative methods, assessed primary legal materials including UUD NRI 1945 and UU PDP, along with secondary legal materials like books, journals, and non-legal materials such as language dictionaries. The results identified an existing lack of clarity in the UU PDP regarding the embraced accountability concept, potentially impairing the optimal filing of compensation claims by personal data subjects. It concluded that adopting the legal accountability concept of vicarious liability could ensure legal certainty for victims and simplify obtaining compensation for personal data misuse. The study implies the necessity for the adoption of vicarious liability, particularly in compensating victims of data misuse, by future institutions involved in personal data protection.

Highlights:

  1. Ambiguity in Regulation: The UU PDP's lack of clarity concerning legal accountability may lead to suboptimal compensation claims for personal data subjects.
  2. Ideal Concept Identified: The vicarious liability concept was determined as an ideal basis for legal accountability in compensating victims of personal data misuse.
  3. Implication for Future Institutions: The findings suggest the importance of adopting vicarious liability in future data protection institutions, particularly regarding compensation for data misuse victims.

Keywords: Vicarious Liability, Personal Data Protection, Legal Responsibility, Compensation, Normative-Juridical Analysis

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. M. P. Aji, “Sistem Keamanan Siber dan Kedaulatan Data di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Politik (Studi Kasus Perlindungan Data Pribadi) [Cyber Security System and Data Sovereignty in Indonesia in Political Economic Perspective],” J. Polit. Din. Masal. Polit. Dalam Negeri dan Hub. Int., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 222–238, 2023, doi: 10.22212/jp.v13i2.3299.
  2. A. Noor and D. Wulandari, “Landasan Konstitusional Perlindungan Data Pribadi Pada Transaksi Fintech Lending di Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Dunia Huk., vol. 5, no. 77, p. 99, 2021, doi: 10.35973/jidh.v0i0.1993.
  3. R. W. Maya Ainiyyah, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Pelanggaran Hak Informasi (Studi Kasus Produk Vitamin D3 Yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Edar Bpom),” Literasi Huk., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 89–103, 2022.
  4. E. Budi, D. Wira, and A. Infantono, “Strategi Penguatan Cyber Security Guna Mewujudkan Keamanan Nasional di Era Society 5.0,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Teknologi dan Inovasi Indonesia (SENASTINDO), 2021, vol. 3, no. November, pp. 223–234, doi: 10.54706/senastindo.v3.2021.141.
  5. M. A. Suharto and Maria Novita Apriyani, “Konsep Cyber Attack, Cyber Crime, Dan Cyber Warfare Dalam Aspek Hukum Internasional,” Risal. Huk., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 98–107, 2021, doi: 10.30872/risalah.v17i2.705.
  6. S. A. Ramadhani, “Komparasi Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia dan Uni Eropa,” J. Huk. Lex Gen., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2022, doi: 10.56370/jhlg.v3i1.173.
  7. M. H. Hisbulloh, “Urgensi Rancangan Undang-Undang (Ruu) Perlindungan Data Pribadi,” Huk. Unissula, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 24, 2021.
  8. S. Yuniarti, “Protection of Indonesia’S Personal Data After the Ratification of the Draft Personal Data Protection Law,” Progress. Law, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–68, 2022.
  9. G. L. & D. A. Ramadhan, “Komisi Independen Perlindungan Data Pribadi : Quasi Peradilan Dan Upaya Terciptanya Right To Be Forgotten Di Indonesia Kajian Putusan Nomor 438 / Pid . Sus / 2020 / Pn . Jkt,” Yudisial, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 227–246, 2022, doi: 10.29123/jy.v15i2.530.
  10. I. Firdaus, “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Hak Privasi Terhadap Data Pribadi dari Kejahatan Peretasan,” J. Rechten Ris. Huk. dan Hak Asasi Mns., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 23–31, 2022, doi: 10.52005/rechten.v4i2.98.
  11. M. Raihan, “Perlindungan Data Diri Konsumen Dan Tanggungjawab Marketplace Terhadap Data Diri Konsumen (Studi Kasus: Kebocoran Data 91 Juta Akun Tokopedia),” Inov. Penelit., vol. 3, no. 10, p. 7853, 2023.
  12. I. M. P. Diantha, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Cetakan ke. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
  13. J. I. J. Efendi, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
  14. D. Fahrizal, D. Anatami, and S. Nurkhotijah, “Analisis Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Keterlambatan Penerbangan,” J. Ilm. Huk. dan Hak Asasi Mns., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2022, doi: 10.35912/jihham.v2i1.1546.
  15. S. Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar). Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2002.
  16. A. Rosemann and X. Zhang, “Exploring the social, ethical, legal, and responsibility dimensions of artificial intelligence for health – a new column in Intelligent Medicine,” Intell. Med., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.imed.2021.12.002.
  17. M. Ampovska, “Differing unjust enrichment and damages in theory and practice under macedonian law,” Balk. Soc. Sci. Rev., vol. 16, pp. 157–173, 2020, doi: 10.46763/BSSR2016157A.
  18. L. Nadriana, “Law Harmonization on Heir Responsibility of Personal Guarantor in Bankrupt Company,” J. Din. Huk., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 12, 2018, doi: 10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.1.1469.
  19. P. M. Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, 10th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  20. J. Salmond and P. J. Fitzgerald, Salmond on Jurisprudence. Mytholmroyd: Sweet & Maxwell, 1966.
  21. M. J. C. Geofrey and F. X. A. Samekto, “Barriers to the enforcement of environmental law: An effect of free market domination and regional autonomy in Indonesia,” Hasanuddin Law Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–45, 2021, doi: 10.20956/halrev.v7i1.1896.
  22. G. Greco and N. Montinaro, “the Phenomenon of Cybercrime: From the Transnational Connotation To the Need for Globalization of Justice,” Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.46827/ejsss.v6i1.956.
  23. M. A. Dar and S. A. Wani, “COVID-19, Personal Data Protection and Privacy in India,” Asian Bioeth. Rev., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 125–140, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00227-0.
  24. S. Rahardjo, Membedah Hukum Progresif, 3rd ed. Jakarta: Kompas, 2008.
  25. I. Sari, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) dalam Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Perdata,” J. Ilm. Huk. Dirgant., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53–70, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v11i1.651.
  26. A. Rohim and A. Romadhoni, “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Atas Penguasaan Sebidang Tanah Yang Telah Mencapai Daluwarsa Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor. 19/Pdt.G/2019/PN.KRS),” Justness J. Huk. Polit. dan Agama, vol. Vol.01, no. 02, pp. 1–28, 2021.
  27. R. Congiu, L. Sabatino, and G. Sapi, “The Impact of Privacy Regulation on Web Traffic: Evidence From the GDPR,” Inf. Econ. Policy, vol. 61, no. 1, p. 11, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.101003.
  28. J. Park and D. S. N. Heriyanto, “In Favor Of An Immigration Data Protection Law In Indonesia And Its Utilization For Contact Tracing,” Prophet. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2022, doi: 10.20885/plr.vol4.iss1.art1.
  29. E. F. Halim, “Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi Pembeli Di Perdagangan Secara Elektronik,” Visio Justisia, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2022.
  30. C. Septi Jayanti and Suraji, “The Issues Of Data Protection Against Leaking Of Personal Data in Security Health Services (A Comparison Between Indonesia and Other Countries Regulations),” Int. J. Business, Econ. Law, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 1, 2022.
  31. C. Alvirnia Nurimani Andraputri and N. Ruhaeni, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Penyebaran Data Pribadi Jurnalis di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi,” in Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 2023, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3, doi: 10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.4960.
  32. R. de Bruin, “A Comparative Analysis of the EU and U.S. Data Privacy Regimes and the Potential for Convergence,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 5, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4251540.
  33. O. J. Gstrein and A. Beaulieu, How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches, vol. 35, no. 1. Springer Netherlands, 2022.
  34. M. Eigenschink et al., “Cross-sectional survey and Bayesian network model analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in Austria: investigating public awareness, usage determinants and perception of scientific support,” BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060644.
  35. S. Sri Wahyuni, Kamal Hidjaz, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Keperdataan Dokter Terhadap Pasien,” J. Lex Gen., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 404–417, 2022.
  36. D. Harmoni et al., “Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit Atas Kelalaian Tenaga Kesehatan Dalam Pelayanan Kegawatdaruratan Medik,” Humantech J. Ilm. Multi Disiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 137–148, 2022.
  37. N. Sage, “Relational Wrongs and Agency in Tort Theory,” Oxf. J. Leg. Stud., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1012–1039, 2021, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqab009.
  38. N. A. Aqil, C. M. Putri, and D. Yunisa, “Evaluation Of Cash On Deivery System For Improving Legal Certainty In The Development Of Electronic Transactions In Indonesia,” Ikat. Penulis Mhs. Huk. Indones. Law J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 251–264, 2022, doi: 10.15294/ipmhi.v2i2.55074.
  39. G. P. Fletcher, “Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory,” Harv. Law Rev., vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 537–573, Jan. 1972, doi: 10.2307/1339623.
  40. L. A. N. Kusuma, “Environmental Disputes Without Protection Of Strict Liability Principles : Again , Law On Job Creation,” Law Justice, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.23917/laj.v7i1.699.
  41. A. Weriansyah and A. P. Ramadani, “The Analysis of Corporate Crime in Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Laws,” Glob. Leg. Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 53, 2022, doi: 10.19166/glr.v2i1.5139.
  42. A. H. Zola Agustina, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Atas Kelalaian Diagnosa Oleh Dokter Hingga Mengakibatkan Kematian Anak Dalam Kandungan,” Iblam Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2022.
  43. E. O. S. H. Zainal Arifin Mochtar, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas, dan Filsafat Hukum, 1st ed. 2021.
  44. R. R. Pahlevi, Z. D. Zaini, and R. A. Hapsari, “Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah,” Pagaruyuang Law J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2021, doi: 10.31869/plj.v5i1.2826.